Cargando…

Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this descriptive study was to observe the distribution of four different classes of non-carious cervical root surface discrepancies in teeth with gingival recession. Additionally to explore the different treatment modalities in the literature for each of these defects. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naik, Vanaja-Krishna, Jacob, Caroline-Annette, Nainar, Deepavalli-Arumuga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52831
_version_ 1782457168249749504
author Naik, Vanaja-Krishna
Jacob, Caroline-Annette
Nainar, Deepavalli-Arumuga
author_facet Naik, Vanaja-Krishna
Jacob, Caroline-Annette
Nainar, Deepavalli-Arumuga
author_sort Naik, Vanaja-Krishna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this descriptive study was to observe the distribution of four different classes of non-carious cervical root surface discrepancies in teeth with gingival recession. Additionally to explore the different treatment modalities in the literature for each of these defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 150 subjects with at least one labial gingival recession were included in the study. 1400 teeth were evaluated using 2.5 X magnification loupes and UNC -15 probe for the presence of the cemento-enamel junction and step like defects according to Pini-Prato’s classification: A-, identifiable CEJ without defect; A+, identifiable CEJ with defect; B-, unidentifiable CEJ without defect, B+, unidentifiable CEJ with defect. Further a comprehensive electronic and hand search of pubmed indexed journals was performed to identify appropriate treatment modalities for these defects and their predictability following restorative/surgical or combination of both. RESULTS: A total of 1400 teeth with exposed root surfaces were examined (793 Maxillary; 607 mandibular). 499 teeth were A-, 405 were A+, 322 were B+ and 174 were B-. The distribution of these defects in different teeth was: 36% premolars, 32% molars, 21% incisors and 11% canines, collectively 68% in the aesthetic zone. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of these lesions are in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Hence the presence of the CEJ and the defect must be taken into account while managing these defects surgically. Key words:Cervical abrasion, gingival recession, magnification loupes, root coverage, step defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50456862016-10-04 Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study Naik, Vanaja-Krishna Jacob, Caroline-Annette Nainar, Deepavalli-Arumuga J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this descriptive study was to observe the distribution of four different classes of non-carious cervical root surface discrepancies in teeth with gingival recession. Additionally to explore the different treatment modalities in the literature for each of these defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 150 subjects with at least one labial gingival recession were included in the study. 1400 teeth were evaluated using 2.5 X magnification loupes and UNC -15 probe for the presence of the cemento-enamel junction and step like defects according to Pini-Prato’s classification: A-, identifiable CEJ without defect; A+, identifiable CEJ with defect; B-, unidentifiable CEJ without defect, B+, unidentifiable CEJ with defect. Further a comprehensive electronic and hand search of pubmed indexed journals was performed to identify appropriate treatment modalities for these defects and their predictability following restorative/surgical or combination of both. RESULTS: A total of 1400 teeth with exposed root surfaces were examined (793 Maxillary; 607 mandibular). 499 teeth were A-, 405 were A+, 322 were B+ and 174 were B-. The distribution of these defects in different teeth was: 36% premolars, 32% molars, 21% incisors and 11% canines, collectively 68% in the aesthetic zone. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of these lesions are in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Hence the presence of the CEJ and the defect must be taken into account while managing these defects surgically. Key words:Cervical abrasion, gingival recession, magnification loupes, root coverage, step defects. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5045686/ /pubmed/27703607 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52831 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Naik, Vanaja-Krishna
Jacob, Caroline-Annette
Nainar, Deepavalli-Arumuga
Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title_full Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title_fullStr Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title_short Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study
title_sort assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: a descriptive study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703607
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52831
work_keys_str_mv AT naikvanajakrishna assessmentofnoncariousrootsurfacedefectsinareasofgingivalrecessionadescriptivestudy
AT jacobcarolineannette assessmentofnoncariousrootsurfacedefectsinareasofgingivalrecessionadescriptivestudy
AT nainardeepavalliarumuga assessmentofnoncariousrootsurfacedefectsinareasofgingivalrecessionadescriptivestudy