Cargando…

Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine arch width changes during maxillary first premolars extraction and non-extraction treatment in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dental casts of 91 Class II division 1 patients (36 males and 55 females) were evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirazi, Sajjad, Kachoei, Mojgan, Shahvaghar-Asl, Naiemeh, Shirazi, Samaneh, Sharghi, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52840
_version_ 1782457168474144768
author Shirazi, Sajjad
Kachoei, Mojgan
Shahvaghar-Asl, Naiemeh
Shirazi, Samaneh
Sharghi, Reza
author_facet Shirazi, Sajjad
Kachoei, Mojgan
Shahvaghar-Asl, Naiemeh
Shirazi, Samaneh
Sharghi, Reza
author_sort Shirazi, Sajjad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine arch width changes during maxillary first premolars extraction and non-extraction treatment in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dental casts of 91 Class II division 1 patients (36 males and 55 females) were evaluated. The minimum age of the subjects at the beginning of treatment was above 16 years. 48 patients were treated with extraction of the maxillary first premolars and 43 patients were treated without extraction. Pre- and post-treatment maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar arch widths were measured. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular inter-canine widths of both groups increased significantly. The maxillary inter-molar width decreased in the extraction group and increased in the non-extraction group. The mandibular inter-molar width increased significantly in both groups. No significant differences were observed between males and females. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that there was a tendency for an increase in arch width during both the extraction and non-extraction treatment except maxillary inter-molar width in the extraction cases. Key words:Dental arch, malocclusion, angle Class II, tooth movement, extraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50456872016-10-04 Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method Shirazi, Sajjad Kachoei, Mojgan Shahvaghar-Asl, Naiemeh Shirazi, Samaneh Sharghi, Reza J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine arch width changes during maxillary first premolars extraction and non-extraction treatment in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dental casts of 91 Class II division 1 patients (36 males and 55 females) were evaluated. The minimum age of the subjects at the beginning of treatment was above 16 years. 48 patients were treated with extraction of the maxillary first premolars and 43 patients were treated without extraction. Pre- and post-treatment maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar arch widths were measured. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular inter-canine widths of both groups increased significantly. The maxillary inter-molar width decreased in the extraction group and increased in the non-extraction group. The mandibular inter-molar width increased significantly in both groups. No significant differences were observed between males and females. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that there was a tendency for an increase in arch width during both the extraction and non-extraction treatment except maxillary inter-molar width in the extraction cases. Key words:Dental arch, malocclusion, angle Class II, tooth movement, extraction. Medicina Oral S.L. 2016-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5045687/ /pubmed/27703608 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52840 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shirazi, Sajjad
Kachoei, Mojgan
Shahvaghar-Asl, Naiemeh
Shirazi, Samaneh
Sharghi, Reza
Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title_full Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title_fullStr Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title_full_unstemmed Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title_short Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
title_sort arch width changes in patients with class ii division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703608
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52840
work_keys_str_mv AT shirazisajjad archwidthchangesinpatientswithclassiidivision1malocclusiontreatedwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractionandnonextractionmethod
AT kachoeimojgan archwidthchangesinpatientswithclassiidivision1malocclusiontreatedwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractionandnonextractionmethod
AT shahvagharaslnaiemeh archwidthchangesinpatientswithclassiidivision1malocclusiontreatedwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractionandnonextractionmethod
AT shirazisamaneh archwidthchangesinpatientswithclassiidivision1malocclusiontreatedwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractionandnonextractionmethod
AT sharghireza archwidthchangesinpatientswithclassiidivision1malocclusiontreatedwithmaxillaryfirstpremolarextractionandnonextractionmethod