Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells

The nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR) regulates the expression of genes involved in the metabolism, hepatobiliary disposition, and toxicity of drugs and endogenous compounds. PXR is a promiscuous nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) with significant ligand and DNA‐binding crosstalk with the constitutive a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Beth, Lorbeer, Mathias, Mitchell, Michael D., Brayman, Timothy G., Riley, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.264
_version_ 1782457198854537216
author Williamson, Beth
Lorbeer, Mathias
Mitchell, Michael D.
Brayman, Timothy G.
Riley, Robert J.
author_facet Williamson, Beth
Lorbeer, Mathias
Mitchell, Michael D.
Brayman, Timothy G.
Riley, Robert J.
author_sort Williamson, Beth
collection PubMed
description The nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR) regulates the expression of genes involved in the metabolism, hepatobiliary disposition, and toxicity of drugs and endogenous compounds. PXR is a promiscuous nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) with significant ligand and DNA‐binding crosstalk with the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR); hence, defining the precise role of PXR in gene regulation is challenging. Here, utilising a novel PXR‐knockout (KO) HepaRG cell line, real‐time PCR analysis was conducted to determine PXR involvement for a range of inducers. The selective PXR agonist rifampicin, a selective CAR activator, 6‐(4‐chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1‐b][1,3]thiazole‐5‐carbaldehyde O‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzyl)oxime (CITCO), and dual activators of CAR and PXR including phenobarbital (PB) were analyzed. HepaRG control cells (5F clone) were responsive to prototypical inducers of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. No response was observed in the PXR‐KO cells treated with rifampicin. Induction of CYP3A4 by PB, artemisinin, and phenytoin was also much reduced in PXR‐KO cells, while the response to CITCO was maintained. This finding is in agreement with the abolition of functional PXR expression. The apparent EC(50) values for PB were in agreement between the cell lines; however, CITCO was ~threefold (0.3 μmol/L vs. 1 μmol/L) lower in the PXR‐KO cells compared with the 5F cells for CYP2B6 induction. Results presented support the application of the novel PXR‐KO cells in the definitive assignment of PXR‐mediated CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 induction. Utilization of such cell lines will allow advancement in composing structure activity relationships rather than relying predominantly on pharmacological manipulations and provide in‐depth mechanistic evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50459422016-10-06 Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells Williamson, Beth Lorbeer, Mathias Mitchell, Michael D. Brayman, Timothy G. Riley, Robert J. Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles The nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR) regulates the expression of genes involved in the metabolism, hepatobiliary disposition, and toxicity of drugs and endogenous compounds. PXR is a promiscuous nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) with significant ligand and DNA‐binding crosstalk with the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR); hence, defining the precise role of PXR in gene regulation is challenging. Here, utilising a novel PXR‐knockout (KO) HepaRG cell line, real‐time PCR analysis was conducted to determine PXR involvement for a range of inducers. The selective PXR agonist rifampicin, a selective CAR activator, 6‐(4‐chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1‐b][1,3]thiazole‐5‐carbaldehyde O‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzyl)oxime (CITCO), and dual activators of CAR and PXR including phenobarbital (PB) were analyzed. HepaRG control cells (5F clone) were responsive to prototypical inducers of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. No response was observed in the PXR‐KO cells treated with rifampicin. Induction of CYP3A4 by PB, artemisinin, and phenytoin was also much reduced in PXR‐KO cells, while the response to CITCO was maintained. This finding is in agreement with the abolition of functional PXR expression. The apparent EC(50) values for PB were in agreement between the cell lines; however, CITCO was ~threefold (0.3 μmol/L vs. 1 μmol/L) lower in the PXR‐KO cells compared with the 5F cells for CYP2B6 induction. Results presented support the application of the novel PXR‐KO cells in the definitive assignment of PXR‐mediated CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 induction. Utilization of such cell lines will allow advancement in composing structure activity relationships rather than relying predominantly on pharmacological manipulations and provide in‐depth mechanistic evaluation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5045942/ /pubmed/27713827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.264 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Williamson, Beth
Lorbeer, Mathias
Mitchell, Michael D.
Brayman, Timothy G.
Riley, Robert J.
Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title_full Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title_short Evaluation of a novel PXR‐knockout in HepaRG(™) cells
title_sort evaluation of a novel pxr‐knockout in heparg(™) cells
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27713827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.264
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsonbeth evaluationofanovelpxrknockoutinhepargcells
AT lorbeermathias evaluationofanovelpxrknockoutinhepargcells
AT mitchellmichaeld evaluationofanovelpxrknockoutinhepargcells
AT braymantimothyg evaluationofanovelpxrknockoutinhepargcells
AT rileyrobertj evaluationofanovelpxrknockoutinhepargcells