Cargando…

Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness

Computational Fluid Dynamics is intensively used to deepen the understanding of aneurysm growth and rupture in order to support physicians during therapy planning. However, numerous studies considering only the hemodynamics within the vessel lumen found no satisfactory criteria for rupture risk asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voß, S., Glaßer, S., Hoffmann, T., Beuing, O., Weigand, S., Jachau, K., Preim, B., Thévenin, D., Janiga, G., Berg, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9854539
_version_ 1782457211419623424
author Voß, S.
Glaßer, S.
Hoffmann, T.
Beuing, O.
Weigand, S.
Jachau, K.
Preim, B.
Thévenin, D.
Janiga, G.
Berg, P.
author_facet Voß, S.
Glaßer, S.
Hoffmann, T.
Beuing, O.
Weigand, S.
Jachau, K.
Preim, B.
Thévenin, D.
Janiga, G.
Berg, P.
author_sort Voß, S.
collection PubMed
description Computational Fluid Dynamics is intensively used to deepen the understanding of aneurysm growth and rupture in order to support physicians during therapy planning. However, numerous studies considering only the hemodynamics within the vessel lumen found no satisfactory criteria for rupture risk assessment. To improve available simulation models, the rigid vessel wall assumption has been discarded in this work and patient-specific wall thickness is considered within the simulation. For this purpose, a ruptured intracranial aneurysm was prepared ex vivo, followed by the acquisition of local wall thickness using μCT. The segmented inner and outer vessel surfaces served as solid domain for the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. To compare wall stress distributions within the aneurysm wall and at the rupture site, FSI computations are repeated in a virtual model using a constant wall thickness approach. Although the wall stresses obtained by the two approaches—when averaged over the complete aneurysm sac—are in very good agreement, strong differences occur in their distribution. Accounting for the real wall thickness distribution, the rupture site exhibits much higher stress values compared to the configuration with constant wall thickness. The study reveals the importance of geometry reconstruction and accurate description of wall thickness in FSI simulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5045998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50459982016-10-09 Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness Voß, S. Glaßer, S. Hoffmann, T. Beuing, O. Weigand, S. Jachau, K. Preim, B. Thévenin, D. Janiga, G. Berg, P. Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Computational Fluid Dynamics is intensively used to deepen the understanding of aneurysm growth and rupture in order to support physicians during therapy planning. However, numerous studies considering only the hemodynamics within the vessel lumen found no satisfactory criteria for rupture risk assessment. To improve available simulation models, the rigid vessel wall assumption has been discarded in this work and patient-specific wall thickness is considered within the simulation. For this purpose, a ruptured intracranial aneurysm was prepared ex vivo, followed by the acquisition of local wall thickness using μCT. The segmented inner and outer vessel surfaces served as solid domain for the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. To compare wall stress distributions within the aneurysm wall and at the rupture site, FSI computations are repeated in a virtual model using a constant wall thickness approach. Although the wall stresses obtained by the two approaches—when averaged over the complete aneurysm sac—are in very good agreement, strong differences occur in their distribution. Accounting for the real wall thickness distribution, the rupture site exhibits much higher stress values compared to the configuration with constant wall thickness. The study reveals the importance of geometry reconstruction and accurate description of wall thickness in FSI simulations. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5045998/ /pubmed/27721898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9854539 Text en Copyright © 2016 S. Voß et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Voß, S.
Glaßer, S.
Hoffmann, T.
Beuing, O.
Weigand, S.
Jachau, K.
Preim, B.
Thévenin, D.
Janiga, G.
Berg, P.
Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title_full Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title_fullStr Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title_full_unstemmed Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title_short Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness
title_sort fluid-structure simulations of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm: constant versus patient-specific wall thickness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5045998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9854539
work_keys_str_mv AT voßs fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT glaßers fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT hoffmannt fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT beuingo fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT weigands fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT jachauk fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT preimb fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT thevenind fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT janigag fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness
AT bergp fluidstructuresimulationsofarupturedintracranialaneurysmconstantversuspatientspecificwallthickness