Cargando…
Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction
BACKGROUND: Pose generation error is usually quantified as the difference between the geometry of the pose generated by the docking software and that of the same molecule co-crystallised with the considered protein. Surprisingly, the impact of this error on binding affinity prediction is yet to be s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28185549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4 |
_version_ | 1782457250244198400 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hongjian Leung, Kwong-Sak Wong, Man-Hon Ballester, Pedro J. |
author_facet | Li, Hongjian Leung, Kwong-Sak Wong, Man-Hon Ballester, Pedro J. |
author_sort | Li, Hongjian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pose generation error is usually quantified as the difference between the geometry of the pose generated by the docking software and that of the same molecule co-crystallised with the considered protein. Surprisingly, the impact of this error on binding affinity prediction is yet to be systematically analysed across diverse protein-ligand complexes. RESULTS: Against commonly-held views, we have found that pose generation error has generally a small impact on the accuracy of binding affinity prediction. This is also true for large pose generation errors and it is not only observed with machine-learning scoring functions, but also with classical scoring functions such as AutoDock Vina. Furthermore, we propose a procedure to correct a substantial part of this error which consists of calibrating the scoring functions with re-docked, rather than co-crystallised, poses. In this way, the relationship between Vina-generated protein-ligand poses and their binding affinities is directly learned. As a result, test set performance after this error-correcting procedure is much closer to that of predicting the binding affinity in the absence of pose generation error (i.e. on crystal structures). We evaluated several strategies, obtaining better results for those using a single docked pose per ligand than those using multiple docked poses per ligand. CONCLUSIONS: Binding affinity prediction is often carried out on the docked pose of a known binder rather than its co-crystallised pose. Our results suggest than pose generation error is in general far less damaging for binding affinity prediction than it is currently believed. Another contribution of our study is the proposal of a procedure that largely corrects for this error. The resulting machine-learning scoring function is freely available at http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/rf-score-4.tgz and http://ballester.marseille.inserm.fr/rf-score-4.tgz. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5046193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50461932016-10-11 Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction Li, Hongjian Leung, Kwong-Sak Wong, Man-Hon Ballester, Pedro J. BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Pose generation error is usually quantified as the difference between the geometry of the pose generated by the docking software and that of the same molecule co-crystallised with the considered protein. Surprisingly, the impact of this error on binding affinity prediction is yet to be systematically analysed across diverse protein-ligand complexes. RESULTS: Against commonly-held views, we have found that pose generation error has generally a small impact on the accuracy of binding affinity prediction. This is also true for large pose generation errors and it is not only observed with machine-learning scoring functions, but also with classical scoring functions such as AutoDock Vina. Furthermore, we propose a procedure to correct a substantial part of this error which consists of calibrating the scoring functions with re-docked, rather than co-crystallised, poses. In this way, the relationship between Vina-generated protein-ligand poses and their binding affinities is directly learned. As a result, test set performance after this error-correcting procedure is much closer to that of predicting the binding affinity in the absence of pose generation error (i.e. on crystal structures). We evaluated several strategies, obtaining better results for those using a single docked pose per ligand than those using multiple docked poses per ligand. CONCLUSIONS: Binding affinity prediction is often carried out on the docked pose of a known binder rather than its co-crystallised pose. Our results suggest than pose generation error is in general far less damaging for binding affinity prediction than it is currently believed. Another contribution of our study is the proposal of a procedure that largely corrects for this error. The resulting machine-learning scoring function is freely available at http://istar.cse.cuhk.edu.hk/rf-score-4.tgz and http://ballester.marseille.inserm.fr/rf-score-4.tgz. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5046193/ /pubmed/28185549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Hongjian Leung, Kwong-Sak Wong, Man-Hon Ballester, Pedro J. Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title | Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title_full | Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title_fullStr | Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title_short | Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
title_sort | correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28185549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1169-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihongjian correctingtheimpactofdockingposegenerationerroronbindingaffinityprediction AT leungkwongsak correctingtheimpactofdockingposegenerationerroronbindingaffinityprediction AT wongmanhon correctingtheimpactofdockingposegenerationerroronbindingaffinityprediction AT ballesterpedroj correctingtheimpactofdockingposegenerationerroronbindingaffinityprediction |