Cargando…
Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502 |
_version_ | 1782457376270450688 |
---|---|
author | Brace, Natalie L. Hedrick, Tyson L. Theriault, Diane H. Fuller, Nathan W. Wu, Zheng Betke, Margrit Parrish, Julia K. Grünbaum, Daniel Morgansen, Kristi A. |
author_facet | Brace, Natalie L. Hedrick, Tyson L. Theriault, Diane H. Fuller, Nathan W. Wu, Zheng Betke, Margrit Parrish, Julia K. Grünbaum, Daniel Morgansen, Kristi A. |
author_sort | Brace, Natalie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5046949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50469492016-10-24 Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods Brace, Natalie L. Hedrick, Tyson L. Theriault, Diane H. Fuller, Nathan W. Wu, Zheng Betke, Margrit Parrish, Julia K. Grünbaum, Daniel Morgansen, Kristi A. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study. The Royal Society 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5046949/ /pubmed/27655669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Life Sciences–Engineering interface Brace, Natalie L. Hedrick, Tyson L. Theriault, Diane H. Fuller, Nathan W. Wu, Zheng Betke, Margrit Parrish, Julia K. Grünbaum, Daniel Morgansen, Kristi A. Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title | Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title_full | Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title_fullStr | Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title_short | Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
title_sort | using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods |
topic | Life Sciences–Engineering interface |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bracenataliel usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT hedricktysonl usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT theriaultdianeh usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT fullernathanw usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT wuzheng usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT betkemargrit usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT parrishjuliak usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT grunbaumdaniel usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods AT morgansenkristia usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods |