Cargando…

Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods

Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brace, Natalie L., Hedrick, Tyson L., Theriault, Diane H., Fuller, Nathan W., Wu, Zheng, Betke, Margrit, Parrish, Julia K., Grünbaum, Daniel, Morgansen, Kristi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502
_version_ 1782457376270450688
author Brace, Natalie L.
Hedrick, Tyson L.
Theriault, Diane H.
Fuller, Nathan W.
Wu, Zheng
Betke, Margrit
Parrish, Julia K.
Grünbaum, Daniel
Morgansen, Kristi A.
author_facet Brace, Natalie L.
Hedrick, Tyson L.
Theriault, Diane H.
Fuller, Nathan W.
Wu, Zheng
Betke, Margrit
Parrish, Julia K.
Grünbaum, Daniel
Morgansen, Kristi A.
author_sort Brace, Natalie L.
collection PubMed
description Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5046949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50469492016-10-24 Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods Brace, Natalie L. Hedrick, Tyson L. Theriault, Diane H. Fuller, Nathan W. Wu, Zheng Betke, Margrit Parrish, Julia K. Grünbaum, Daniel Morgansen, Kristi A. J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Engineering interface Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study. The Royal Society 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5046949/ /pubmed/27655669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Engineering interface
Brace, Natalie L.
Hedrick, Tyson L.
Theriault, Diane H.
Fuller, Nathan W.
Wu, Zheng
Betke, Margrit
Parrish, Julia K.
Grünbaum, Daniel
Morgansen, Kristi A.
Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title_full Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title_fullStr Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title_full_unstemmed Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title_short Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
title_sort using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
topic Life Sciences–Engineering interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5046949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0502
work_keys_str_mv AT bracenataliel usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT hedricktysonl usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT theriaultdianeh usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT fullernathanw usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT wuzheng usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT betkemargrit usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT parrishjuliak usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT grunbaumdaniel usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods
AT morgansenkristia usingcollisionconestoassessbiologicaldeconflictionmethods