Cargando…

Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans

Pro-social behaviors are defined as voluntary actions that benefit others. Comparative studies have mostly focused on investigating the presence of pro-sociality across species in an intraspecific context. Taken together, results on both primates and non-primate species indicate that reliance on coo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène, Mainix, Gaëlle, Range, Friederike, Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5047953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01416
_version_ 1782457505295630336
author Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène
Mainix, Gaëlle
Range, Friederike
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
author_facet Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène
Mainix, Gaëlle
Range, Friederike
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
author_sort Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène
collection PubMed
description Pro-social behaviors are defined as voluntary actions that benefit others. Comparative studies have mostly focused on investigating the presence of pro-sociality across species in an intraspecific context. Taken together, results on both primates and non-primate species indicate that reliance on cooperation may be at work in the selection and maintenance of pro-social sentiments. Dogs appear to be the ideal model when investigating a species’ propensity for pro-sociality in an interspecific context because it has been suggested that as a consequence of domestication, they evolved an underlying temperament encouraging greater propensity to cooperate with human partners. In a recent study, using a food delivery paradigm, dogs were shown to preferentially express pro-social choices toward familiar compared to unfamiliar conspecifics. Using the same set-up and methods in the current study, we investigated dogs’ pro-social preferences toward familiar and unfamiliar human partners. We found that dogs’ pro-social tendencies did not extend to humans and the identity of the human partners did not influence the rate of food delivery. Interestingly, dogs tested with their human partners spent more time gazing at humans, and did so for longer after food consumption had ended than dogs tested with conspecific partners in the initial study. To allow comparability between results from dogs tested with a conspecific and a human partner, the latter were asked not to communicate with dogs in any way. However, this lack of communication from the human may have been aversive to dogs, leading them to cease performing the task earlier compared to the dogs paired with familiar conspecifics in the prior study. This is in line with previous findings suggesting that human communication in such contexts highly affects dogs’ responses. Consequently, we encourage further studies to examine dogs’ pro-social behavior toward humans taking into consideration their potential responses both with and without human communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5047953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50479532016-10-18 Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène Mainix, Gaëlle Range, Friederike Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Front Psychol Psychology Pro-social behaviors are defined as voluntary actions that benefit others. Comparative studies have mostly focused on investigating the presence of pro-sociality across species in an intraspecific context. Taken together, results on both primates and non-primate species indicate that reliance on cooperation may be at work in the selection and maintenance of pro-social sentiments. Dogs appear to be the ideal model when investigating a species’ propensity for pro-sociality in an interspecific context because it has been suggested that as a consequence of domestication, they evolved an underlying temperament encouraging greater propensity to cooperate with human partners. In a recent study, using a food delivery paradigm, dogs were shown to preferentially express pro-social choices toward familiar compared to unfamiliar conspecifics. Using the same set-up and methods in the current study, we investigated dogs’ pro-social preferences toward familiar and unfamiliar human partners. We found that dogs’ pro-social tendencies did not extend to humans and the identity of the human partners did not influence the rate of food delivery. Interestingly, dogs tested with their human partners spent more time gazing at humans, and did so for longer after food consumption had ended than dogs tested with conspecific partners in the initial study. To allow comparability between results from dogs tested with a conspecific and a human partner, the latter were asked not to communicate with dogs in any way. However, this lack of communication from the human may have been aversive to dogs, leading them to cease performing the task earlier compared to the dogs paired with familiar conspecifics in the prior study. This is in line with previous findings suggesting that human communication in such contexts highly affects dogs’ responses. Consequently, we encourage further studies to examine dogs’ pro-social behavior toward humans taking into consideration their potential responses both with and without human communication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5047953/ /pubmed/27757085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01416 Text en Copyright © 2016 Quervel-Chaumette, Mainix, Range and Marshall-Pescini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Quervel-Chaumette, Mylène
Mainix, Gaëlle
Range, Friederike
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title_full Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title_fullStr Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title_full_unstemmed Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title_short Dogs Do Not Show Pro-social Preferences towards Humans
title_sort dogs do not show pro-social preferences towards humans
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5047953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01416
work_keys_str_mv AT quervelchaumettemylene dogsdonotshowprosocialpreferencestowardshumans
AT mainixgaelle dogsdonotshowprosocialpreferencestowardshumans
AT rangefriederike dogsdonotshowprosocialpreferencestowardshumans
AT marshallpescinisarah dogsdonotshowprosocialpreferencestowardshumans