Cargando…
ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms
Quality assessment of protein models using no other information than the structure of the model itself has been shown to be useful for structure prediction. Here, we introduce two novel methods, ProQRosFA and ProQRosCen, inspired by the state-of-art method ProQ2, but using a completely different des...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33509 |
_version_ | 1782457538571141120 |
---|---|
author | Uziela, Karolis Shu, Nanjiang Wallner, Björn Elofsson, Arne |
author_facet | Uziela, Karolis Shu, Nanjiang Wallner, Björn Elofsson, Arne |
author_sort | Uziela, Karolis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality assessment of protein models using no other information than the structure of the model itself has been shown to be useful for structure prediction. Here, we introduce two novel methods, ProQRosFA and ProQRosCen, inspired by the state-of-art method ProQ2, but using a completely different description of a protein model. ProQ2 uses contacts and other features calculated from a model, while the new predictors are based on Rosetta energies: ProQRosFA uses the full-atom energy function that takes into account all atoms, while ProQRosCen uses the coarse-grained centroid energy function. The two new predictors also include residue conservation and terms corresponding to the agreement of a model with predicted secondary structure and surface area, as in ProQ2. We show that the performance of these predictors is on par with ProQ2 and significantly better than all other model quality assessment programs. Furthermore, we show that combining the input features from all three predictors, the resulting predictor ProQ3 performs better than any of the individual methods. ProQ3, ProQRosFA and ProQRosCen are freely available both as a webserver and stand-alone programs at http://proq3.bioinfo.se/. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5048106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50481062016-10-11 ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms Uziela, Karolis Shu, Nanjiang Wallner, Björn Elofsson, Arne Sci Rep Article Quality assessment of protein models using no other information than the structure of the model itself has been shown to be useful for structure prediction. Here, we introduce two novel methods, ProQRosFA and ProQRosCen, inspired by the state-of-art method ProQ2, but using a completely different description of a protein model. ProQ2 uses contacts and other features calculated from a model, while the new predictors are based on Rosetta energies: ProQRosFA uses the full-atom energy function that takes into account all atoms, while ProQRosCen uses the coarse-grained centroid energy function. The two new predictors also include residue conservation and terms corresponding to the agreement of a model with predicted secondary structure and surface area, as in ProQ2. We show that the performance of these predictors is on par with ProQ2 and significantly better than all other model quality assessment programs. Furthermore, we show that combining the input features from all three predictors, the resulting predictor ProQ3 performs better than any of the individual methods. ProQ3, ProQRosFA and ProQRosCen are freely available both as a webserver and stand-alone programs at http://proq3.bioinfo.se/. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5048106/ /pubmed/27698390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33509 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Uziela, Karolis Shu, Nanjiang Wallner, Björn Elofsson, Arne ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title | ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title_full | ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title_fullStr | ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title_full_unstemmed | ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title_short | ProQ3: Improved model quality assessments using Rosetta energy terms |
title_sort | proq3: improved model quality assessments using rosetta energy terms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27698390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uzielakarolis proq3improvedmodelqualityassessmentsusingrosettaenergyterms AT shunanjiang proq3improvedmodelqualityassessmentsusingrosettaenergyterms AT wallnerbjorn proq3improvedmodelqualityassessmentsusingrosettaenergyterms AT elofssonarne proq3improvedmodelqualityassessmentsusingrosettaenergyterms |