Cargando…

Genetic composition of captive panda population

BACKGROUND: A major function of the captive panda population is to preserve the genetic diversity of wild panda populations in their natural habitats. Understanding the genetic composition of the captive panda population in terms of genetic contributions from the wild panda populations provides nece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jiandong, Shen, Fujun, Hou, Rong, Da, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0441-y
_version_ 1782457593965314048
author Yang, Jiandong
Shen, Fujun
Hou, Rong
Da, Yang
author_facet Yang, Jiandong
Shen, Fujun
Hou, Rong
Da, Yang
author_sort Yang, Jiandong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major function of the captive panda population is to preserve the genetic diversity of wild panda populations in their natural habitats. Understanding the genetic composition of the captive panda population in terms of genetic contributions from the wild panda populations provides necessary knowledge for breeding plans to preserve the genetic diversity of the wild panda populations. RESULTS: The genetic contributions from different wild populations to the captive panda population were highly unbalanced, with Qionglai accounting for 52.2 % of the captive panda gene pool, followed by Minshan with 21.5 %, Qinling with 10.6 %, Liangshan with 8.2 %, and Xiaoxiangling with 3.6 %, whereas Daxiangling, which had similar population size as Xiaoxiangling, had no genetic representation in the captive population. The current breeding recommendations may increase the contribution of some small wild populations at the expense of decreasing the contributions of other small wild populations, i.e., increasing the Xiaoxiangling contribution while decreasing the contribution of Liangshan, or sharply increasing the Qinling contribution while decreasing the contributions of Xiaoxiangling and Liangshan, which were two of the three smallest wild populations and were already severely under-represented in the captive population. We developed three habitat-controlled breeding plans that could increase the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations to 6.7–11.2 % for Xiaoxiangling, 11.5–12.3 % for Liangshan and 12.9–20.0 % for Qinling among the offspring of one breeding season while reducing the risk of hidden inbreeding due to related founders from the same habitat undetectable by pedigree data. CONCLUSION: The three smallest wild panda populations of Daxiangling, Xiaoxiangling and Liangshan either had no representation or were severely unrepresented in the current captive panda population. By incorporating the breeding goal of increasing the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations into breeding plans, the severely under-represented small wild populations in the current captive panda population could be increased steadily for the near future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0441-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5048454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50484542016-10-11 Genetic composition of captive panda population Yang, Jiandong Shen, Fujun Hou, Rong Da, Yang BMC Genet Research Article BACKGROUND: A major function of the captive panda population is to preserve the genetic diversity of wild panda populations in their natural habitats. Understanding the genetic composition of the captive panda population in terms of genetic contributions from the wild panda populations provides necessary knowledge for breeding plans to preserve the genetic diversity of the wild panda populations. RESULTS: The genetic contributions from different wild populations to the captive panda population were highly unbalanced, with Qionglai accounting for 52.2 % of the captive panda gene pool, followed by Minshan with 21.5 %, Qinling with 10.6 %, Liangshan with 8.2 %, and Xiaoxiangling with 3.6 %, whereas Daxiangling, which had similar population size as Xiaoxiangling, had no genetic representation in the captive population. The current breeding recommendations may increase the contribution of some small wild populations at the expense of decreasing the contributions of other small wild populations, i.e., increasing the Xiaoxiangling contribution while decreasing the contribution of Liangshan, or sharply increasing the Qinling contribution while decreasing the contributions of Xiaoxiangling and Liangshan, which were two of the three smallest wild populations and were already severely under-represented in the captive population. We developed three habitat-controlled breeding plans that could increase the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations to 6.7–11.2 % for Xiaoxiangling, 11.5–12.3 % for Liangshan and 12.9–20.0 % for Qinling among the offspring of one breeding season while reducing the risk of hidden inbreeding due to related founders from the same habitat undetectable by pedigree data. CONCLUSION: The three smallest wild panda populations of Daxiangling, Xiaoxiangling and Liangshan either had no representation or were severely unrepresented in the current captive panda population. By incorporating the breeding goal of increasing the genetic contributions from the smallest wild populations into breeding plans, the severely under-represented small wild populations in the current captive panda population could be increased steadily for the near future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0441-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5048454/ /pubmed/27716024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0441-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Jiandong
Shen, Fujun
Hou, Rong
Da, Yang
Genetic composition of captive panda population
title Genetic composition of captive panda population
title_full Genetic composition of captive panda population
title_fullStr Genetic composition of captive panda population
title_full_unstemmed Genetic composition of captive panda population
title_short Genetic composition of captive panda population
title_sort genetic composition of captive panda population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0441-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjiandong geneticcompositionofcaptivepandapopulation
AT shenfujun geneticcompositionofcaptivepandapopulation
AT hourong geneticcompositionofcaptivepandapopulation
AT dayang geneticcompositionofcaptivepandapopulation