Cargando…

Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as promising alternative to conventional cancer treatments works by irradiation of a photosensitizer (PS) with light, which creates reactive oxygen species and singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)), that damage the tumor. However, a routine use is hindered by the PS’s poor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hinger, Doris, Gräfe, Susanna, Navarro, Fabrice, Spingler, Bernhard, Pandiarajan, Devaraj, Walt, Heinrich, Couffin, Anne-Claude, Maake, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0223-8
_version_ 1782457605793251328
author Hinger, Doris
Gräfe, Susanna
Navarro, Fabrice
Spingler, Bernhard
Pandiarajan, Devaraj
Walt, Heinrich
Couffin, Anne-Claude
Maake, Caroline
author_facet Hinger, Doris
Gräfe, Susanna
Navarro, Fabrice
Spingler, Bernhard
Pandiarajan, Devaraj
Walt, Heinrich
Couffin, Anne-Claude
Maake, Caroline
author_sort Hinger, Doris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as promising alternative to conventional cancer treatments works by irradiation of a photosensitizer (PS) with light, which creates reactive oxygen species and singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)), that damage the tumor. However, a routine use is hindered by the PS’s poor water solubility and extended cutaneous photosensitivity of patients after treatment. In our study we sought to overcome these limitations by encapsulation of the PS m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) into a biocompatible nanoemulsion (Lipidots). RESULTS: In CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice we compared the Lipidots to the existing liposomal mTHPC nanoformulation Foslip and the approved mTHPC formulation Foscan. We established biodistribution profiles via fluorescence measurements in vivo and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. All formulations accumulated in the tumors and we could determine the optimum treatment time point for each substance (8 h for mTHPC, 24 h for Foslip and 72 h for the Lipidots). We used two different light doses (10  and 20 J/cm(2)) and evaluated immediate PDT effects 48 h after treatment and long term effects 14 days later. We also analyzed tumors by histological analysis and performing reverse transcription real-time PCR with RNA extracts. Concerning tumor destruction Foslip was superior to Lipidots and Foscan while with regard to tolerance and side effects Lipidots were giving the best results. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate in our study that nanoformulations are superior to the free PS mTHPC. The development of a potent nanoformulation is of major importance because the free PS is related to several issues such as poor bioavailability, solubility and increased photosensibility of patients. We could show in this study that Foslip is very potent in destroying the tumors itself. However, because the Lipidots' biocompatibility is outstanding and superior to the liposomes we plan to carry out further investigations and protocol optimization. Both nanoformulations show great potential to revolutionize PDT in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5048629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50486292016-10-11 Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice Hinger, Doris Gräfe, Susanna Navarro, Fabrice Spingler, Bernhard Pandiarajan, Devaraj Walt, Heinrich Couffin, Anne-Claude Maake, Caroline J Nanobiotechnology Research BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as promising alternative to conventional cancer treatments works by irradiation of a photosensitizer (PS) with light, which creates reactive oxygen species and singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)), that damage the tumor. However, a routine use is hindered by the PS’s poor water solubility and extended cutaneous photosensitivity of patients after treatment. In our study we sought to overcome these limitations by encapsulation of the PS m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) into a biocompatible nanoemulsion (Lipidots). RESULTS: In CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice we compared the Lipidots to the existing liposomal mTHPC nanoformulation Foslip and the approved mTHPC formulation Foscan. We established biodistribution profiles via fluorescence measurements in vivo and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. All formulations accumulated in the tumors and we could determine the optimum treatment time point for each substance (8 h for mTHPC, 24 h for Foslip and 72 h for the Lipidots). We used two different light doses (10  and 20 J/cm(2)) and evaluated immediate PDT effects 48 h after treatment and long term effects 14 days later. We also analyzed tumors by histological analysis and performing reverse transcription real-time PCR with RNA extracts. Concerning tumor destruction Foslip was superior to Lipidots and Foscan while with regard to tolerance and side effects Lipidots were giving the best results. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate in our study that nanoformulations are superior to the free PS mTHPC. The development of a potent nanoformulation is of major importance because the free PS is related to several issues such as poor bioavailability, solubility and increased photosensibility of patients. We could show in this study that Foslip is very potent in destroying the tumors itself. However, because the Lipidots' biocompatibility is outstanding and superior to the liposomes we plan to carry out further investigations and protocol optimization. Both nanoformulations show great potential to revolutionize PDT in the future. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5048629/ /pubmed/27716314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0223-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hinger, Doris
Gräfe, Susanna
Navarro, Fabrice
Spingler, Bernhard
Pandiarajan, Devaraj
Walt, Heinrich
Couffin, Anne-Claude
Maake, Caroline
Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title_full Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title_fullStr Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title_full_unstemmed Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title_short Lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in CAL-33 tumor bearing nude mice
title_sort lipid nanoemulsions and liposomes improve photodynamic treatment efficacy and tolerance in cal-33 tumor bearing nude mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0223-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hingerdoris lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT grafesusanna lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT navarrofabrice lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT spinglerbernhard lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT pandiarajandevaraj lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT waltheinrich lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT couffinanneclaude lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice
AT maakecaroline lipidnanoemulsionsandliposomesimprovephotodynamictreatmentefficacyandtoleranceincal33tumorbearingnudemice