Cargando…
Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1 |
_version_ | 1782457617207001088 |
---|---|
author | Ruff, Ryan Richard Sischo, Lacey Broder, Hillary L. |
author_facet | Ruff, Ryan Richard Sischo, Lacey Broder, Hillary L. |
author_sort | Ruff, Ryan Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the COHIP for patients with cleft lip/palate. METHODS: Data from a 6-year, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children with cleft lip/palate were analyzed to estimate the MID. Analysis was restricted to patients with data at baseline and first follow-up and not receiving a surgical intervention in the intervening years (N = 281). MIDs were estimated via the anchor-based method, using the Global Assessment of Change, and the effect size distribution method. RESULTS: Based on the distributional method, the minimally important differences were 0.16 (oral health), 0.12 (functional), 0.22 (social-emotional), 0.21 (school environment) and 0.19 (self-image). MID anchor estimates for COHIP domains ranged from −0.32 to 0.84. The anchor-based and effect size MID estimates for the overall COHIP score were 2.95 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in patients with cleft lip/palate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5048688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50486882016-10-11 Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies Ruff, Ryan Richard Sischo, Lacey Broder, Hillary L. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the COHIP for patients with cleft lip/palate. METHODS: Data from a 6-year, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children with cleft lip/palate were analyzed to estimate the MID. Analysis was restricted to patients with data at baseline and first follow-up and not receiving a surgical intervention in the intervening years (N = 281). MIDs were estimated via the anchor-based method, using the Global Assessment of Change, and the effect size distribution method. RESULTS: Based on the distributional method, the minimally important differences were 0.16 (oral health), 0.12 (functional), 0.22 (social-emotional), 0.21 (school environment) and 0.19 (self-image). MID anchor estimates for COHIP domains ranged from −0.32 to 0.84. The anchor-based and effect size MID estimates for the overall COHIP score were 2.95 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in patients with cleft lip/palate. BioMed Central 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5048688/ /pubmed/27716239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ruff, Ryan Richard Sischo, Lacey Broder, Hillary L. Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title | Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title_full | Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title_fullStr | Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title_short | Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
title_sort | minimally important difference of the child oral health impact profile for children with orofacial anomalies |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruffryanrichard minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies AT sischolacey minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies AT broderhillaryl minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies |