Cargando…

Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies

BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruff, Ryan Richard, Sischo, Lacey, Broder, Hillary L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1
_version_ 1782457617207001088
author Ruff, Ryan Richard
Sischo, Lacey
Broder, Hillary L.
author_facet Ruff, Ryan Richard
Sischo, Lacey
Broder, Hillary L.
author_sort Ruff, Ryan Richard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the COHIP for patients with cleft lip/palate. METHODS: Data from a 6-year, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children with cleft lip/palate were analyzed to estimate the MID. Analysis was restricted to patients with data at baseline and first follow-up and not receiving a surgical intervention in the intervening years (N = 281). MIDs were estimated via the anchor-based method, using the Global Assessment of Change, and the effect size distribution method. RESULTS: Based on the distributional method, the minimally important differences were 0.16 (oral health), 0.12 (functional), 0.22 (social-emotional), 0.21 (school environment) and 0.19 (self-image). MID anchor estimates for COHIP domains ranged from −0.32 to 0.84. The anchor-based and effect size MID estimates for the overall COHIP score were 2.95 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in patients with cleft lip/palate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5048688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50486882016-10-11 Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies Ruff, Ryan Richard Sischo, Lacey Broder, Hillary L. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) is an instrument designed to measure the self-reported oral health-related quality of life of children between the ages of 8 and 15, including domains for oral health, functional well-being, social-emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. The purpose of this study was to estimate the minimally important difference (MID) of the COHIP for patients with cleft lip/palate. METHODS: Data from a 6-year, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of children with cleft lip/palate were analyzed to estimate the MID. Analysis was restricted to patients with data at baseline and first follow-up and not receiving a surgical intervention in the intervening years (N = 281). MIDs were estimated via the anchor-based method, using the Global Assessment of Change, and the effect size distribution method. RESULTS: Based on the distributional method, the minimally important differences were 0.16 (oral health), 0.12 (functional), 0.22 (social-emotional), 0.21 (school environment) and 0.19 (self-image). MID anchor estimates for COHIP domains ranged from −0.32 to 0.84. The anchor-based and effect size MID estimates for the overall COHIP score were 2.95 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in patients with cleft lip/palate. BioMed Central 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5048688/ /pubmed/27716239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ruff, Ryan Richard
Sischo, Lacey
Broder, Hillary L.
Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title_full Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title_fullStr Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title_full_unstemmed Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title_short Minimally important difference of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile for children with orofacial anomalies
title_sort minimally important difference of the child oral health impact profile for children with orofacial anomalies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0544-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ruffryanrichard minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies
AT sischolacey minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies
AT broderhillaryl minimallyimportantdifferenceofthechildoralhealthimpactprofileforchildrenwithorofacialanomalies