Cargando…

A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pellacani, G., Peris, K., Guillen, C., Clonier, F., Larsson, T., Venkata, R., Puig, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211
_version_ 1782457746688311296
author Pellacani, G.
Peris, K.
Guillen, C.
Clonier, F.
Larsson, T.
Venkata, R.
Puig, S.
author_facet Pellacani, G.
Peris, K.
Guillen, C.
Clonier, F.
Larsson, T.
Venkata, R.
Puig, S.
author_sort Pellacani, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction when treating separate areas simultaneously or sequentially with different concentrations of ingenol mebutate gel. METHODS: In this phase IIIb study (NCT01787383), patients with clinically visible, non‐hyperkeratotic AKs on two separate treatment areas (face/scalp and trunk/extremities) were randomized to simultaneous or sequential treatment with ingenol mebutate gel (0.015% and 0.05%). Endpoints included composite local skin response (LSR) score 3 days after first application, complete AK clearance and percentage reduction in AKs at week 8. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between simultaneous (n = 101) and sequential (n = 98) groups in composite LSR score (10.4 vs. 9.7), complete clearance (52.7% vs. 46.9%) or percentage reduction in AKs (83.4% vs. 79.1%). Mean composite LSR scores on face/scalp and trunk/extremities were similar for both groups. Adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, the most common treatment‐related AEs being pruritus and pain at the application site. CONCLUSION: Treating AKs with ingenol mebutate simultaneously or sequentially gave similar results in terms of tolerability (LSR score, AEs) and efficacy (complete clearance). Therefore, the physician and patient can select the most convenient treatment regimen, with confidence in achieving a similar outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5049592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50495922016-10-06 A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body Pellacani, G. Peris, K. Guillen, C. Clonier, F. Larsson, T. Venkata, R. Puig, S. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction when treating separate areas simultaneously or sequentially with different concentrations of ingenol mebutate gel. METHODS: In this phase IIIb study (NCT01787383), patients with clinically visible, non‐hyperkeratotic AKs on two separate treatment areas (face/scalp and trunk/extremities) were randomized to simultaneous or sequential treatment with ingenol mebutate gel (0.015% and 0.05%). Endpoints included composite local skin response (LSR) score 3 days after first application, complete AK clearance and percentage reduction in AKs at week 8. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between simultaneous (n = 101) and sequential (n = 98) groups in composite LSR score (10.4 vs. 9.7), complete clearance (52.7% vs. 46.9%) or percentage reduction in AKs (83.4% vs. 79.1%). Mean composite LSR scores on face/scalp and trunk/extremities were similar for both groups. Adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, the most common treatment‐related AEs being pruritus and pain at the application site. CONCLUSION: Treating AKs with ingenol mebutate simultaneously or sequentially gave similar results in terms of tolerability (LSR score, AEs) and efficacy (complete clearance). Therefore, the physician and patient can select the most convenient treatment regimen, with confidence in achieving a similar outcome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11 2015-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5049592/ /pubmed/26300464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211 Text en © 2015 LEO Pharma A/S. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pellacani, G.
Peris, K.
Guillen, C.
Clonier, F.
Larsson, T.
Venkata, R.
Puig, S.
A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title_full A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title_fullStr A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title_full_unstemmed A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title_short A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
title_sort randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211
work_keys_str_mv AT pellacanig arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT perisk arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT guillenc arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT clonierf arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT larssont arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT venkatar arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT puigs arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT pellacanig randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT perisk randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT guillenc randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT clonierf randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT larssont randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT venkatar randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody
AT puigs randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody