Cargando…
A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211 |
_version_ | 1782457746688311296 |
---|---|
author | Pellacani, G. Peris, K. Guillen, C. Clonier, F. Larsson, T. Venkata, R. Puig, S. |
author_facet | Pellacani, G. Peris, K. Guillen, C. Clonier, F. Larsson, T. Venkata, R. Puig, S. |
author_sort | Pellacani, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction when treating separate areas simultaneously or sequentially with different concentrations of ingenol mebutate gel. METHODS: In this phase IIIb study (NCT01787383), patients with clinically visible, non‐hyperkeratotic AKs on two separate treatment areas (face/scalp and trunk/extremities) were randomized to simultaneous or sequential treatment with ingenol mebutate gel (0.015% and 0.05%). Endpoints included composite local skin response (LSR) score 3 days after first application, complete AK clearance and percentage reduction in AKs at week 8. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between simultaneous (n = 101) and sequential (n = 98) groups in composite LSR score (10.4 vs. 9.7), complete clearance (52.7% vs. 46.9%) or percentage reduction in AKs (83.4% vs. 79.1%). Mean composite LSR scores on face/scalp and trunk/extremities were similar for both groups. Adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, the most common treatment‐related AEs being pruritus and pain at the application site. CONCLUSION: Treating AKs with ingenol mebutate simultaneously or sequentially gave similar results in terms of tolerability (LSR score, AEs) and efficacy (complete clearance). Therefore, the physician and patient can select the most convenient treatment regimen, with confidence in achieving a similar outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5049592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50495922016-10-06 A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body Pellacani, G. Peris, K. Guillen, C. Clonier, F. Larsson, T. Venkata, R. Puig, S. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are precursors to invasive squamous cell carcinoma and can progress if untreated. Limited data support the use of ingenol mebutate to treat AKs on more than one area of the body simultaneously. OBJECTIVE: To investigate safety, efficacy and treatment satisfaction when treating separate areas simultaneously or sequentially with different concentrations of ingenol mebutate gel. METHODS: In this phase IIIb study (NCT01787383), patients with clinically visible, non‐hyperkeratotic AKs on two separate treatment areas (face/scalp and trunk/extremities) were randomized to simultaneous or sequential treatment with ingenol mebutate gel (0.015% and 0.05%). Endpoints included composite local skin response (LSR) score 3 days after first application, complete AK clearance and percentage reduction in AKs at week 8. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between simultaneous (n = 101) and sequential (n = 98) groups in composite LSR score (10.4 vs. 9.7), complete clearance (52.7% vs. 46.9%) or percentage reduction in AKs (83.4% vs. 79.1%). Mean composite LSR scores on face/scalp and trunk/extremities were similar for both groups. Adverse event (AE) incidence was comparable between groups, the most common treatment‐related AEs being pruritus and pain at the application site. CONCLUSION: Treating AKs with ingenol mebutate simultaneously or sequentially gave similar results in terms of tolerability (LSR score, AEs) and efficacy (complete clearance). Therefore, the physician and patient can select the most convenient treatment regimen, with confidence in achieving a similar outcome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11 2015-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5049592/ /pubmed/26300464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211 Text en © 2015 LEO Pharma A/S. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pellacani, G. Peris, K. Guillen, C. Clonier, F. Larsson, T. Venkata, R. Puig, S. A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title | A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title_full | A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title_fullStr | A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title_short | A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
title_sort | randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pellacanig arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT perisk arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT guillenc arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT clonierf arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT larssont arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT venkatar arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT puigs arandomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT pellacanig randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT perisk randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT guillenc randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT clonierf randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT larssont randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT venkatar randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody AT puigs randomizedtrialcomparingsimultaneousvssequentialfieldtreatmentofactinickeratosiswithingenolmebutateontwoseparateareasoftheheadandbody |