Cargando…

A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus

BACKGROUND: Each individual psoriasis patient has different expectations and goals for biological treatment, which may differ from those of the clinician. As such, a patient‐centred approach to treatment goals remains an unmet need in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review availab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strohal, R., Prinz, J. C., Girolomoni, G., Nast, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26370908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13248
_version_ 1782457755546681344
author Strohal, R.
Prinz, J. C.
Girolomoni, G.
Nast, A.
author_facet Strohal, R.
Prinz, J. C.
Girolomoni, G.
Nast, A.
author_sort Strohal, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Each individual psoriasis patient has different expectations and goals for biological treatment, which may differ from those of the clinician. As such, a patient‐centred approach to treatment goals remains an unmet need in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review available data on patients’ and physicians’ decision criteria and expectations of biological treatment for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis with the aim of developing a core set of questions for clinicians to ask patients routinely to understand what is important to them and thus better align physicians’ and patients’ expectations of treatment with biologics and its outcomes. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify key themes and data gaps. Aspects of treatment relevant when choosing a biological agent for an individual patient were identified and compared to an existing validated instrument. A series of questions aimed at helping the physician to identify the particular aspects of treatment that are recognised as important to individual psoriasis patients was developed. RESULTS: Key findings of the literature search were grouped under themes of adherence, decision‐making, quality of life, patient/physician goals, communication, patient‐reported outcomes, satisfaction and patient benefit index. Several aspects of treatment were identified as being relevant when choosing a biological agent for an individual patient. The questionnaire is devised in two parts. The first part asks questions about patients’ experience of psoriasis and satisfaction with previous treatments. The second part aims to identify the treatment attributes patients consider to be important and may as such affect their preference for a particular biological treatment. The questionnaire results will allow the physician to understand the key factors that can be influenced by biological drug choice that are of importance to the patient. This information can be used be the physician in clinical decision making. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire has been developed to provide a new tool to better understand and align patients’ and physicians’ preferences and goals for biological treatment of psoriasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5049629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50496292016-10-06 A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus Strohal, R. Prinz, J. C. Girolomoni, G. Nast, A. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Each individual psoriasis patient has different expectations and goals for biological treatment, which may differ from those of the clinician. As such, a patient‐centred approach to treatment goals remains an unmet need in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review available data on patients’ and physicians’ decision criteria and expectations of biological treatment for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis with the aim of developing a core set of questions for clinicians to ask patients routinely to understand what is important to them and thus better align physicians’ and patients’ expectations of treatment with biologics and its outcomes. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify key themes and data gaps. Aspects of treatment relevant when choosing a biological agent for an individual patient were identified and compared to an existing validated instrument. A series of questions aimed at helping the physician to identify the particular aspects of treatment that are recognised as important to individual psoriasis patients was developed. RESULTS: Key findings of the literature search were grouped under themes of adherence, decision‐making, quality of life, patient/physician goals, communication, patient‐reported outcomes, satisfaction and patient benefit index. Several aspects of treatment were identified as being relevant when choosing a biological agent for an individual patient. The questionnaire is devised in two parts. The first part asks questions about patients’ experience of psoriasis and satisfaction with previous treatments. The second part aims to identify the treatment attributes patients consider to be important and may as such affect their preference for a particular biological treatment. The questionnaire results will allow the physician to understand the key factors that can be influenced by biological drug choice that are of importance to the patient. This information can be used be the physician in clinical decision making. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire has been developed to provide a new tool to better understand and align patients’ and physicians’ preferences and goals for biological treatment of psoriasis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-14 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5049629/ /pubmed/26370908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13248 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Strohal, R.
Prinz, J. C.
Girolomoni, G.
Nast, A.
A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title_full A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title_fullStr A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title_full_unstemmed A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title_short A patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
title_sort patient‐centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26370908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13248
work_keys_str_mv AT strohalr apatientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT prinzjc apatientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT girolomonig apatientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT nasta apatientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT strohalr patientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT prinzjc patientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT girolomonig patientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus
AT nasta patientcentredapproachtobiologicaltreatmentdecisionmakingforpsoriasisanexpertconsensus