Cargando…
The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27701431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764 |
_version_ | 1782457771406393344 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Cassie Perkin, Oliver J. McGuigan, Miranda P. Stokes, Keith A. |
author_facet | Wilson, Cassie Perkin, Oliver J. McGuigan, Miranda P. Stokes, Keith A. |
author_sort | Wilson, Cassie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions on a seated leg press dynamometer. Peak power and velocity (at 40% maximum resistance) were measured along with the coordination (coupling angle) of the lower limb joints using the vector coding technique. The younger adults produced significantly greater peak power than the older adults (mean ± SD; 762 W ± 245 vs 361 W ± 162, p < 0.01) and at higher peak velocities (mean ± SD; 1.37 m/s ± 0.05 vs 1.00 m/s ± 0.06, p < 0.01). The older adults produced less consistent values of peak power than younger adults, evidenced by a higher coefficient of variation (mean ± SD; 7.6% ± 5.2 vs 5.0% ± 3.0, p < 0.01), however, there was significantly less variability in the coupling angles displayed by the older adults compared to the younger adults (mean ± SD; 2.0° ± 1.1 vs 3.5° ± 2.7, p < 0.01 (ankle-knee); 1.7° ± 0.6 vs 4.1° ± 3.0, p < 0.01 (knee-hip)). The results of this study demonstrate that older adults display higher outcome variability but lower variability in technique (coordination). The more rigid movement strategies displayed by the older adults potentially reflects an increased risk of overuse injury due to repetitive demands on the same structures, or the reduced ability to respond to unexpected situations due to a lack of flexibility in joint control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5049752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50497522016-10-27 The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press Wilson, Cassie Perkin, Oliver J. McGuigan, Miranda P. Stokes, Keith A. PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions on a seated leg press dynamometer. Peak power and velocity (at 40% maximum resistance) were measured along with the coordination (coupling angle) of the lower limb joints using the vector coding technique. The younger adults produced significantly greater peak power than the older adults (mean ± SD; 762 W ± 245 vs 361 W ± 162, p < 0.01) and at higher peak velocities (mean ± SD; 1.37 m/s ± 0.05 vs 1.00 m/s ± 0.06, p < 0.01). The older adults produced less consistent values of peak power than younger adults, evidenced by a higher coefficient of variation (mean ± SD; 7.6% ± 5.2 vs 5.0% ± 3.0, p < 0.01), however, there was significantly less variability in the coupling angles displayed by the older adults compared to the younger adults (mean ± SD; 2.0° ± 1.1 vs 3.5° ± 2.7, p < 0.01 (ankle-knee); 1.7° ± 0.6 vs 4.1° ± 3.0, p < 0.01 (knee-hip)). The results of this study demonstrate that older adults display higher outcome variability but lower variability in technique (coordination). The more rigid movement strategies displayed by the older adults potentially reflects an increased risk of overuse injury due to repetitive demands on the same structures, or the reduced ability to respond to unexpected situations due to a lack of flexibility in joint control. Public Library of Science 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5049752/ /pubmed/27701431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764 Text en © 2016 Wilson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wilson, Cassie Perkin, Oliver J. McGuigan, Miranda P. Stokes, Keith A. The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title | The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title_full | The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title_short | The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press |
title_sort | effect of age on technique variability and outcome variability during a leg press |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27701431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsoncassie theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT perkinoliverj theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT mcguiganmirandap theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT stokeskeitha theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT wilsoncassie effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT perkinoliverj effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT mcguiganmirandap effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress AT stokeskeitha effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress |