Cargando…

The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Cassie, Perkin, Oliver J., McGuigan, Miranda P., Stokes, Keith A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27701431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764
_version_ 1782457771406393344
author Wilson, Cassie
Perkin, Oliver J.
McGuigan, Miranda P.
Stokes, Keith A.
author_facet Wilson, Cassie
Perkin, Oliver J.
McGuigan, Miranda P.
Stokes, Keith A.
author_sort Wilson, Cassie
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions on a seated leg press dynamometer. Peak power and velocity (at 40% maximum resistance) were measured along with the coordination (coupling angle) of the lower limb joints using the vector coding technique. The younger adults produced significantly greater peak power than the older adults (mean ± SD; 762 W ± 245 vs 361 W ± 162, p < 0.01) and at higher peak velocities (mean ± SD; 1.37 m/s ± 0.05 vs 1.00 m/s ± 0.06, p < 0.01). The older adults produced less consistent values of peak power than younger adults, evidenced by a higher coefficient of variation (mean ± SD; 7.6% ± 5.2 vs 5.0% ± 3.0, p < 0.01), however, there was significantly less variability in the coupling angles displayed by the older adults compared to the younger adults (mean ± SD; 2.0° ± 1.1 vs 3.5° ± 2.7, p < 0.01 (ankle-knee); 1.7° ± 0.6 vs 4.1° ± 3.0, p < 0.01 (knee-hip)). The results of this study demonstrate that older adults display higher outcome variability but lower variability in technique (coordination). The more rigid movement strategies displayed by the older adults potentially reflects an increased risk of overuse injury due to repetitive demands on the same structures, or the reduced ability to respond to unexpected situations due to a lack of flexibility in joint control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5049752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50497522016-10-27 The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press Wilson, Cassie Perkin, Oliver J. McGuigan, Miranda P. Stokes, Keith A. PLoS One Research Article The aim of this study was to determine the effect of aging on power generation and joint coordination during a leg press, in order to increase understanding of how functional movements are affected during the aging process. 44 older and 24 younger adults performed eight sub-maximal power repetitions on a seated leg press dynamometer. Peak power and velocity (at 40% maximum resistance) were measured along with the coordination (coupling angle) of the lower limb joints using the vector coding technique. The younger adults produced significantly greater peak power than the older adults (mean ± SD; 762 W ± 245 vs 361 W ± 162, p < 0.01) and at higher peak velocities (mean ± SD; 1.37 m/s ± 0.05 vs 1.00 m/s ± 0.06, p < 0.01). The older adults produced less consistent values of peak power than younger adults, evidenced by a higher coefficient of variation (mean ± SD; 7.6% ± 5.2 vs 5.0% ± 3.0, p < 0.01), however, there was significantly less variability in the coupling angles displayed by the older adults compared to the younger adults (mean ± SD; 2.0° ± 1.1 vs 3.5° ± 2.7, p < 0.01 (ankle-knee); 1.7° ± 0.6 vs 4.1° ± 3.0, p < 0.01 (knee-hip)). The results of this study demonstrate that older adults display higher outcome variability but lower variability in technique (coordination). The more rigid movement strategies displayed by the older adults potentially reflects an increased risk of overuse injury due to repetitive demands on the same structures, or the reduced ability to respond to unexpected situations due to a lack of flexibility in joint control. Public Library of Science 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5049752/ /pubmed/27701431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764 Text en © 2016 Wilson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, Cassie
Perkin, Oliver J.
McGuigan, Miranda P.
Stokes, Keith A.
The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title_full The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title_fullStr The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title_short The Effect of Age on Technique Variability and Outcome Variability during a Leg Press
title_sort effect of age on technique variability and outcome variability during a leg press
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27701431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163764
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsoncassie theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT perkinoliverj theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT mcguiganmirandap theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT stokeskeitha theeffectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT wilsoncassie effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT perkinoliverj effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT mcguiganmirandap effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress
AT stokeskeitha effectofageontechniquevariabilityandoutcomevariabilityduringalegpress