Cargando…

The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study

The 2015 Informatics Needs and Capacity of Local Health Departments (LHDs) survey is the most recent comprehensive source of quantitative data on LHD informatics. Conducted by the National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO), this is the third nationally representative quantit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shah, Gulzar H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000474
_version_ 1782457813076803584
author Shah, Gulzar H.
author_facet Shah, Gulzar H.
author_sort Shah, Gulzar H.
collection PubMed
description The 2015 Informatics Needs and Capacity of Local Health Departments (LHDs) survey is the most recent comprehensive source of quantitative data on LHD informatics. Conducted by the National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO), this is the third nationally representative quantitative study of LHD informatics since 2009. The previous 2 comprehensive quantitative assessments were conducted by NACCHO in 2009-2010 and 2011. Given that public health informatics is rapidly evolving, the 2015 Informatics survey is a much-needed country-wide assessment of the current informatics needs and capacities of LHDs. This article outlines detailed methodology used in the 2015 Informatics survey, including instrument development, pretesting, sampling design and sample size, survey administration, and sampling weights. A 9-member advisory committee representing federal, state, and local health agency representatives guided the design and implementation of this study. The survey instrument was organized into 6 topic areas: demographics, physical infrastructure, skills and capacity available, public health workforce development needs, electronic health records, and health information exchange. The instrument was pretested with a sample of 20 LHDs and subsequently pilot-tested with 30 LHDs. The survey was administered via the Qualtrics survey software to the sample of 650 LHDs, selected using stratified random sampling. The survey was fielded for approximately 8 weeks and 324 usable responses were received, constituting a response rate of 50%. Statistical weights were developed to account for 3 factors: (a) disproportionate response rate by population size (using 7 population strata), (b) oversampling of LHDs with larger population sizes, and (c) sampling rather than a census approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5049955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50499552016-11-01 The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study Shah, Gulzar H. J Public Health Manag Pract Original Articles The 2015 Informatics Needs and Capacity of Local Health Departments (LHDs) survey is the most recent comprehensive source of quantitative data on LHD informatics. Conducted by the National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO), this is the third nationally representative quantitative study of LHD informatics since 2009. The previous 2 comprehensive quantitative assessments were conducted by NACCHO in 2009-2010 and 2011. Given that public health informatics is rapidly evolving, the 2015 Informatics survey is a much-needed country-wide assessment of the current informatics needs and capacities of LHDs. This article outlines detailed methodology used in the 2015 Informatics survey, including instrument development, pretesting, sampling design and sample size, survey administration, and sampling weights. A 9-member advisory committee representing federal, state, and local health agency representatives guided the design and implementation of this study. The survey instrument was organized into 6 topic areas: demographics, physical infrastructure, skills and capacity available, public health workforce development needs, electronic health records, and health information exchange. The instrument was pretested with a sample of 20 LHDs and subsequently pilot-tested with 30 LHDs. The survey was administered via the Qualtrics survey software to the sample of 650 LHDs, selected using stratified random sampling. The survey was fielded for approximately 8 weeks and 324 usable responses were received, constituting a response rate of 50%. Statistical weights were developed to account for 3 factors: (a) disproportionate response rate by population size (using 7 population strata), (b) oversampling of LHDs with larger population sizes, and (c) sampling rather than a census approach. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2016-11 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5049955/ /pubmed/27684627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000474 Text en © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Shah, Gulzar H.
The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title_full The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title_fullStr The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title_full_unstemmed The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title_short The Methods Behind 2015 Informatics Capacity and Needs Assessment Study
title_sort methods behind 2015 informatics capacity and needs assessment study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5049955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000474
work_keys_str_mv AT shahgulzarh themethodsbehind2015informaticscapacityandneedsassessmentstudy
AT shahgulzarh methodsbehind2015informaticscapacityandneedsassessmentstudy