Cargando…

Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study

BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rouzé, Anahita, De Jonckheere, Julien, Zerimech, Farid, Labreuche, Julien, Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika, Voisin, Benoit, Jaillette, Emmanuelle, Maboudou, Patrice, Balduyck, Malika, Nseir, Saad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2
_version_ 1782457830982287360
author Rouzé, Anahita
De Jonckheere, Julien
Zerimech, Farid
Labreuche, Julien
Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika
Voisin, Benoit
Jaillette, Emmanuelle
Maboudou, Patrice
Balduyck, Malika
Nseir, Saad
author_facet Rouzé, Anahita
De Jonckheere, Julien
Zerimech, Farid
Labreuche, Julien
Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika
Voisin, Benoit
Jaillette, Emmanuelle
Maboudou, Patrice
Balduyck, Malika
Nseir, Saad
author_sort Rouzé, Anahita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic lesions. The primary objective of our study was to determine the efficiency of an electronic device in continuously controlling P (cuff). The secondary objective was to determine the impact of this device on the occurrence of microaspiration of gastric or oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this prospective randomized controlled crossover study. They randomly received either continuous control of P (cuff) with Mallinckrodt(®) device for 24 h, followed by discontinuous control with a manual manometer for 24 h, or the reverse sequence. During the 48 h after randomization, P (cuff) was continuously recorded, and pepsin and alpha amylase were quantitatively measured in tracheal aspirates. P (cuff) target was 25 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar during the two study periods, as well as mean airway pressure. Percentage of time spent with cuff overinflation or underinflation was significantly lower during continuous control compared with routine care period [median (IQR) 0.8 (0.1, 2) vs 20.9 (3.1, 40.1), p = 0.0009]. No significant difference was found in pepsin [median (IQR) 230 (151, 300) vs 259 (134, 368), p = 0.95] or in alpha amylase level [median (IQR) 1475 (528, 10,333) vs 2400 (1342, 15,391), p = 0.19] between continuous control and routine care periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic device is efficient in controlling P (cuff), compared with routine care using a manometer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this device on intubation-related complications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01965821
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50501782016-10-24 Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study Rouzé, Anahita De Jonckheere, Julien Zerimech, Farid Labreuche, Julien Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika Voisin, Benoit Jaillette, Emmanuelle Maboudou, Patrice Balduyck, Malika Nseir, Saad Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic lesions. The primary objective of our study was to determine the efficiency of an electronic device in continuously controlling P (cuff). The secondary objective was to determine the impact of this device on the occurrence of microaspiration of gastric or oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this prospective randomized controlled crossover study. They randomly received either continuous control of P (cuff) with Mallinckrodt(®) device for 24 h, followed by discontinuous control with a manual manometer for 24 h, or the reverse sequence. During the 48 h after randomization, P (cuff) was continuously recorded, and pepsin and alpha amylase were quantitatively measured in tracheal aspirates. P (cuff) target was 25 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar during the two study periods, as well as mean airway pressure. Percentage of time spent with cuff overinflation or underinflation was significantly lower during continuous control compared with routine care period [median (IQR) 0.8 (0.1, 2) vs 20.9 (3.1, 40.1), p = 0.0009]. No significant difference was found in pepsin [median (IQR) 230 (151, 300) vs 259 (134, 368), p = 0.95] or in alpha amylase level [median (IQR) 1475 (528, 10,333) vs 2400 (1342, 15,391), p = 0.19] between continuous control and routine care periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic device is efficient in controlling P (cuff), compared with routine care using a manometer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this device on intubation-related complications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01965821 Springer Paris 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050178/ /pubmed/27704488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Rouzé, Anahita
De Jonckheere, Julien
Zerimech, Farid
Labreuche, Julien
Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika
Voisin, Benoit
Jaillette, Emmanuelle
Maboudou, Patrice
Balduyck, Malika
Nseir, Saad
Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title_full Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title_fullStr Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title_short Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
title_sort efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rouzeanahita efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT dejonckheerejulien efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT zerimechfarid efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT labreuchejulien efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT parmentierdecrucqerika efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT voisinbenoit efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT jailletteemmanuelle efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT maboudoupatrice efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT balduyckmalika efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT nseirsaad efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy