Cargando…
Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study
BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2 |
_version_ | 1782457830982287360 |
---|---|
author | Rouzé, Anahita De Jonckheere, Julien Zerimech, Farid Labreuche, Julien Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika Voisin, Benoit Jaillette, Emmanuelle Maboudou, Patrice Balduyck, Malika Nseir, Saad |
author_facet | Rouzé, Anahita De Jonckheere, Julien Zerimech, Farid Labreuche, Julien Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika Voisin, Benoit Jaillette, Emmanuelle Maboudou, Patrice Balduyck, Malika Nseir, Saad |
author_sort | Rouzé, Anahita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic lesions. The primary objective of our study was to determine the efficiency of an electronic device in continuously controlling P (cuff). The secondary objective was to determine the impact of this device on the occurrence of microaspiration of gastric or oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this prospective randomized controlled crossover study. They randomly received either continuous control of P (cuff) with Mallinckrodt(®) device for 24 h, followed by discontinuous control with a manual manometer for 24 h, or the reverse sequence. During the 48 h after randomization, P (cuff) was continuously recorded, and pepsin and alpha amylase were quantitatively measured in tracheal aspirates. P (cuff) target was 25 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar during the two study periods, as well as mean airway pressure. Percentage of time spent with cuff overinflation or underinflation was significantly lower during continuous control compared with routine care period [median (IQR) 0.8 (0.1, 2) vs 20.9 (3.1, 40.1), p = 0.0009]. No significant difference was found in pepsin [median (IQR) 230 (151, 300) vs 259 (134, 368), p = 0.95] or in alpha amylase level [median (IQR) 1475 (528, 10,333) vs 2400 (1342, 15,391), p = 0.19] between continuous control and routine care periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic device is efficient in controlling P (cuff), compared with routine care using a manometer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this device on intubation-related complications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01965821 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50501782016-10-24 Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study Rouzé, Anahita De Jonckheere, Julien Zerimech, Farid Labreuche, Julien Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika Voisin, Benoit Jaillette, Emmanuelle Maboudou, Patrice Balduyck, Malika Nseir, Saad Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Despite intermittent control of tracheal cuff pressure (P (cuff)) using a manual manometer, cuff underinflation (<20 cmH(2)O) and overinflation (>30 cmH(2)O) frequently occur in intubated critically ill patients, resulting in increased risk of microaspiration and tracheal ischemic lesions. The primary objective of our study was to determine the efficiency of an electronic device in continuously controlling P (cuff). The secondary objective was to determine the impact of this device on the occurrence of microaspiration of gastric or oropharyngeal secretions. METHODS: Eighteen patients requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this prospective randomized controlled crossover study. They randomly received either continuous control of P (cuff) with Mallinckrodt(®) device for 24 h, followed by discontinuous control with a manual manometer for 24 h, or the reverse sequence. During the 48 h after randomization, P (cuff) was continuously recorded, and pepsin and alpha amylase were quantitatively measured in tracheal aspirates. P (cuff) target was 25 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics were similar during the two study periods, as well as mean airway pressure. Percentage of time spent with cuff overinflation or underinflation was significantly lower during continuous control compared with routine care period [median (IQR) 0.8 (0.1, 2) vs 20.9 (3.1, 40.1), p = 0.0009]. No significant difference was found in pepsin [median (IQR) 230 (151, 300) vs 259 (134, 368), p = 0.95] or in alpha amylase level [median (IQR) 1475 (528, 10,333) vs 2400 (1342, 15,391), p = 0.19] between continuous control and routine care periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic device is efficient in controlling P (cuff), compared with routine care using a manometer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this device on intubation-related complications. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01965821 Springer Paris 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050178/ /pubmed/27704488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Rouzé, Anahita De Jonckheere, Julien Zerimech, Farid Labreuche, Julien Parmentier-Decrucq, Erika Voisin, Benoit Jaillette, Emmanuelle Maboudou, Patrice Balduyck, Malika Nseir, Saad Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title | Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title_full | Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title_fullStr | Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title_short | Efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
title_sort | efficiency of an electronic device in controlling tracheal cuff pressure in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled crossover study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27704488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0200-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rouzeanahita efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT dejonckheerejulien efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT zerimechfarid efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT labreuchejulien efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT parmentierdecrucqerika efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT voisinbenoit efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT jailletteemmanuelle efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT maboudoupatrice efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT balduyckmalika efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT nseirsaad efficiencyofanelectronicdeviceincontrollingtrachealcuffpressureincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy |