Cargando…
Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain?
Psychology moved beyond the stimulus response mapping of behaviorism by adopting an information processing framework. This shift from behavioral to cognitive science was partly inspired by work demonstrating that the concept of information could be defined and quantified (Shannon, 1948). This transi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1002-0 |
_version_ | 1782457842971705344 |
---|---|
author | de-Wit, Lee Alexander, David Ekroll, Vebjørn Wagemans, Johan |
author_facet | de-Wit, Lee Alexander, David Ekroll, Vebjørn Wagemans, Johan |
author_sort | de-Wit, Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Psychology moved beyond the stimulus response mapping of behaviorism by adopting an information processing framework. This shift from behavioral to cognitive science was partly inspired by work demonstrating that the concept of information could be defined and quantified (Shannon, 1948). This transition developed further from cognitive science into cognitive neuroscience, in an attempt to measure information in the brain. In the cognitive neurosciences, however, the term information is often used without a clear definition. This paper will argue that, if the formulation proposed by Shannon is applied to modern neuroimaging, then numerous results would be interpreted differently. More specifically, we argue that much modern cognitive neuroscience implicitly focuses on the question of how we can interpret the activations we record in the brain (experimenter-as-receiver), rather than on the core question of how the rest of the brain can interpret those activations (cortex-as-receiver). A clearer focus on whether activations recorded via neuroimaging can actually act as information in the brain would not only change how findings are interpreted but should also change the direction of empirical research in cognitive neuroscience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50502412016-10-20 Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? de-Wit, Lee Alexander, David Ekroll, Vebjørn Wagemans, Johan Psychon Bull Rev Theoretical Review Psychology moved beyond the stimulus response mapping of behaviorism by adopting an information processing framework. This shift from behavioral to cognitive science was partly inspired by work demonstrating that the concept of information could be defined and quantified (Shannon, 1948). This transition developed further from cognitive science into cognitive neuroscience, in an attempt to measure information in the brain. In the cognitive neurosciences, however, the term information is often used without a clear definition. This paper will argue that, if the formulation proposed by Shannon is applied to modern neuroimaging, then numerous results would be interpreted differently. More specifically, we argue that much modern cognitive neuroscience implicitly focuses on the question of how we can interpret the activations we record in the brain (experimenter-as-receiver), rather than on the core question of how the rest of the brain can interpret those activations (cortex-as-receiver). A clearer focus on whether activations recorded via neuroimaging can actually act as information in the brain would not only change how findings are interpreted but should also change the direction of empirical research in cognitive neuroscience. Springer US 2016-02-01 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5050241/ /pubmed/26833316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1002-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Theoretical Review de-Wit, Lee Alexander, David Ekroll, Vebjørn Wagemans, Johan Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title | Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title_full | Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title_fullStr | Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title_short | Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
title_sort | is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? |
topic | Theoretical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1002-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewitlee isneuroimagingmeasuringinformationinthebrain AT alexanderdavid isneuroimagingmeasuringinformationinthebrain AT ekrollvebjørn isneuroimagingmeasuringinformationinthebrain AT wagemansjohan isneuroimagingmeasuringinformationinthebrain |