Cargando…

Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study

Consistent and robust manufacturing is essential for the translation of cell therapies, and the utilisation automation throughout the manufacturing process may allow for improvements in quality control, scalability, reproducibility and economics of the process. The aim of this study was to measure a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Archibald, Peter R. T., Chandra, Amit, Thomas, Dave, Chose, Olivier, Massouridès, Emmanuelle, Laâbi, Yacine, Williams, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1659-9
_version_ 1782457845788180480
author Archibald, Peter R. T.
Chandra, Amit
Thomas, Dave
Chose, Olivier
Massouridès, Emmanuelle
Laâbi, Yacine
Williams, David J.
author_facet Archibald, Peter R. T.
Chandra, Amit
Thomas, Dave
Chose, Olivier
Massouridès, Emmanuelle
Laâbi, Yacine
Williams, David J.
author_sort Archibald, Peter R. T.
collection PubMed
description Consistent and robust manufacturing is essential for the translation of cell therapies, and the utilisation automation throughout the manufacturing process may allow for improvements in quality control, scalability, reproducibility and economics of the process. The aim of this study was to measure and establish the comparability between alternative process steps for the culture of hiPSCs. Consequently, the effects of manual centrifugation and automated non-centrifugation process steps, performed using TAP Biosystems’ CompacT SelecT automated cell culture platform, upon the culture of a human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) line (VAX001024c07) were compared. This study, has demonstrated that comparable morphologies and cell diameters were observed in hiPSCs cultured using either manual or automated process steps. However, non-centrifugation hiPSC populations exhibited greater cell yields, greater aggregate rates, increased pluripotency marker expression, and decreased differentiation marker expression compared to centrifugation hiPSCs. A trend for decreased variability in cell yield was also observed after the utilisation of the automated process step. This study also highlights the detrimental effect of the cryopreservation and thawing processes upon the growth and characteristics of hiPSC cultures, and demonstrates that automated hiPSC manufacturing protocols can be successfully transferred between independent laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50502532016-10-20 Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study Archibald, Peter R. T. Chandra, Amit Thomas, Dave Chose, Olivier Massouridès, Emmanuelle Laâbi, Yacine Williams, David J. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng Original Paper Consistent and robust manufacturing is essential for the translation of cell therapies, and the utilisation automation throughout the manufacturing process may allow for improvements in quality control, scalability, reproducibility and economics of the process. The aim of this study was to measure and establish the comparability between alternative process steps for the culture of hiPSCs. Consequently, the effects of manual centrifugation and automated non-centrifugation process steps, performed using TAP Biosystems’ CompacT SelecT automated cell culture platform, upon the culture of a human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) line (VAX001024c07) were compared. This study, has demonstrated that comparable morphologies and cell diameters were observed in hiPSCs cultured using either manual or automated process steps. However, non-centrifugation hiPSC populations exhibited greater cell yields, greater aggregate rates, increased pluripotency marker expression, and decreased differentiation marker expression compared to centrifugation hiPSCs. A trend for decreased variability in cell yield was also observed after the utilisation of the automated process step. This study also highlights the detrimental effect of the cryopreservation and thawing processes upon the growth and characteristics of hiPSC cultures, and demonstrates that automated hiPSC manufacturing protocols can be successfully transferred between independent laboratories. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-08-08 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5050253/ /pubmed/27503483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1659-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Archibald, Peter R. T.
Chandra, Amit
Thomas, Dave
Chose, Olivier
Massouridès, Emmanuelle
Laâbi, Yacine
Williams, David J.
Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title_full Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title_fullStr Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title_short Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
title_sort comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1659-9
work_keys_str_mv AT archibaldpeterrt comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT chandraamit comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT thomasdave comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT choseolivier comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT massouridesemmanuelle comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT laabiyacine comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy
AT williamsdavidj comparabilityofautomatedhumaninducedpluripotentstemcellcultureapilotstudy