Cargando…

Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroll, Ryan R, Boyd, J Gordon, Maslove, David M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025
_version_ 1782457869392674816
author Kroll, Ryan R
Boyd, J Gordon
Maslove, David M
author_facet Kroll, Ryan R
Boyd, J Gordon
Maslove, David M
author_sort Kroll, Ryan R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning system to detect clinical deterioration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of heart rate monitoring by a personal fitness tracker (PFT) among hospital inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 50 stable patients in the intensive care unit who each completed 24 hours of heart rate monitoring using a wrist-worn PFT. Accuracy of heart rate recordings was compared with gold standard measurements derived from continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring. The accuracy of heart rates measured by pulse oximetry (Spo(2).R) was also measured as a positive control. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, PFT-derived heart rate values were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring (average bias of −1.14 beats per minute [bpm], with limits of agreement of 24 bpm). By comparison, Spo(2).R recordings produced more accurate values (average bias of +0.15 bpm, limits of agreement of 13 bpm, P<.001 as compared with PFT). Personal fitness tracker device performance was significantly better in patients in sinus rhythm than in those who were not (average bias −0.99 bpm vs −5.02 bpm, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Personal fitness tracker–derived heart rates were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring in real-world testing and not as accurate as Spo(2).R-derived heart rates. Performance was worse among patients who were not in sinus rhythm. Further clinical evaluation is indicated to see if PFTs can augment early warning systems in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527408; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527408 (Archived by WebCite at  http://www.webcitation.org/6kOFez3on)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50503832016-10-20 Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study Kroll, Ryan R Boyd, J Gordon Maslove, David M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning system to detect clinical deterioration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of heart rate monitoring by a personal fitness tracker (PFT) among hospital inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 50 stable patients in the intensive care unit who each completed 24 hours of heart rate monitoring using a wrist-worn PFT. Accuracy of heart rate recordings was compared with gold standard measurements derived from continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring. The accuracy of heart rates measured by pulse oximetry (Spo(2).R) was also measured as a positive control. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, PFT-derived heart rate values were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring (average bias of −1.14 beats per minute [bpm], with limits of agreement of 24 bpm). By comparison, Spo(2).R recordings produced more accurate values (average bias of +0.15 bpm, limits of agreement of 13 bpm, P<.001 as compared with PFT). Personal fitness tracker device performance was significantly better in patients in sinus rhythm than in those who were not (average bias −0.99 bpm vs −5.02 bpm, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Personal fitness tracker–derived heart rates were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring in real-world testing and not as accurate as Spo(2).R-derived heart rates. Performance was worse among patients who were not in sinus rhythm. Further clinical evaluation is indicated to see if PFTs can augment early warning systems in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527408; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527408 (Archived by WebCite at  http://www.webcitation.org/6kOFez3on) JMIR Publications 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5050383/ /pubmed/27651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025 Text en ©Ryan R Kroll, J Gordon Boyd, David M Maslove. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.09.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kroll, Ryan R
Boyd, J Gordon
Maslove, David M
Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort accuracy of a wrist-worn wearable device for monitoring heart rates in hospital inpatients: a prospective observational study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025
work_keys_str_mv AT krollryanr accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT boydjgordon accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT maslovedavidm accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy