Cargando…
Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study
BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning syst...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025 |
_version_ | 1782457869392674816 |
---|---|
author | Kroll, Ryan R Boyd, J Gordon Maslove, David M |
author_facet | Kroll, Ryan R Boyd, J Gordon Maslove, David M |
author_sort | Kroll, Ryan R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning system to detect clinical deterioration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of heart rate monitoring by a personal fitness tracker (PFT) among hospital inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 50 stable patients in the intensive care unit who each completed 24 hours of heart rate monitoring using a wrist-worn PFT. Accuracy of heart rate recordings was compared with gold standard measurements derived from continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring. The accuracy of heart rates measured by pulse oximetry (Spo(2).R) was also measured as a positive control. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, PFT-derived heart rate values were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring (average bias of −1.14 beats per minute [bpm], with limits of agreement of 24 bpm). By comparison, Spo(2).R recordings produced more accurate values (average bias of +0.15 bpm, limits of agreement of 13 bpm, P<.001 as compared with PFT). Personal fitness tracker device performance was significantly better in patients in sinus rhythm than in those who were not (average bias −0.99 bpm vs −5.02 bpm, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Personal fitness tracker–derived heart rates were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring in real-world testing and not as accurate as Spo(2).R-derived heart rates. Performance was worse among patients who were not in sinus rhythm. Further clinical evaluation is indicated to see if PFTs can augment early warning systems in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527408; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527408 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6kOFez3on) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50503832016-10-20 Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study Kroll, Ryan R Boyd, J Gordon Maslove, David M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: As the sensing capabilities of wearable devices improve, there is increasing interest in their application in medical settings. Capabilities such as heart rate monitoring may be useful in hospitalized patients as a means of enhancing routine monitoring or as part of an early warning system to detect clinical deterioration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of heart rate monitoring by a personal fitness tracker (PFT) among hospital inpatients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of 50 stable patients in the intensive care unit who each completed 24 hours of heart rate monitoring using a wrist-worn PFT. Accuracy of heart rate recordings was compared with gold standard measurements derived from continuous electrocardiographic (cECG) monitoring. The accuracy of heart rates measured by pulse oximetry (Spo(2).R) was also measured as a positive control. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, PFT-derived heart rate values were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring (average bias of −1.14 beats per minute [bpm], with limits of agreement of 24 bpm). By comparison, Spo(2).R recordings produced more accurate values (average bias of +0.15 bpm, limits of agreement of 13 bpm, P<.001 as compared with PFT). Personal fitness tracker device performance was significantly better in patients in sinus rhythm than in those who were not (average bias −0.99 bpm vs −5.02 bpm, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Personal fitness tracker–derived heart rates were slightly lower than those derived from cECG monitoring in real-world testing and not as accurate as Spo(2).R-derived heart rates. Performance was worse among patients who were not in sinus rhythm. Further clinical evaluation is indicated to see if PFTs can augment early warning systems in hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527408; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02527408 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6kOFez3on) JMIR Publications 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5050383/ /pubmed/27651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025 Text en ©Ryan R Kroll, J Gordon Boyd, David M Maslove. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.09.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kroll, Ryan R Boyd, J Gordon Maslove, David M Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Accuracy of a Wrist-Worn Wearable Device for Monitoring Heart Rates in Hospital Inpatients: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | accuracy of a wrist-worn wearable device for monitoring heart rates in hospital inpatients: a prospective observational study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krollryanr accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT boydjgordon accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT maslovedavidm accuracyofawristwornwearabledeviceformonitoringheartratesinhospitalinpatientsaprospectiveobservationalstudy |