Cargando…

Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field

Background. Diagnosis of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) requires laboratory testing. Methods. The RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit and the derived RealStar Zaire Ebolavirus RT-PCR kit were validated using in vitro transcripts, supernatant of in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rieger, Toni, Kerber, Romy, El Halas, Hussein, Pallasch, Elisa, Duraffour, Sophie, Günther, Stephan, Ölschläger, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw246
_version_ 1782457887610634240
author Rieger, Toni
Kerber, Romy
El Halas, Hussein
Pallasch, Elisa
Duraffour, Sophie
Günther, Stephan
Ölschläger, Stephan
author_facet Rieger, Toni
Kerber, Romy
El Halas, Hussein
Pallasch, Elisa
Duraffour, Sophie
Günther, Stephan
Ölschläger, Stephan
author_sort Rieger, Toni
collection PubMed
description Background. Diagnosis of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) requires laboratory testing. Methods. The RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit and the derived RealStar Zaire Ebolavirus RT-PCR kit were validated using in vitro transcripts, supernatant of infected cell cultures, and clinical specimens from patients with EVD. Results. The Filovirus Screen kit detected EBOV, Sudan virus, Taï Forest virus, Bundibugyo virus, Reston virus, and Marburg virus and differentiated between the genera Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus. The amount of filovirus RNA that could be detected with a probability of 95% ranged from 11 to 67 RNA copies/reaction on a LightCycler 480 II. The Zaire Ebolavirus kit is based on the Filovirus Screen kit but was optimized for detection of EBOV. It has an improved signal-to-noise ratio at low EBOV RNA concentrations and is somewhat more sensitive than the Filovirus kit. Both kits show significantly lower analytical sensitivity on a SmartCycler II. Clinical evaluation revealed that the SmartCycler II, compared with other real-time PCR platforms, decreases the clinical sensitivity of the Filovirus Screen kit to diagnose EVD at an early stage. Conclusions. The Filovirus Screen kit detects all human-pathogenic filoviruses with good analytical sensitivity if performed on an appropriate real-time PCR platform. High analytical sensitivity is important for early diagnosis of EVD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50504722016-10-06 Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field Rieger, Toni Kerber, Romy El Halas, Hussein Pallasch, Elisa Duraffour, Sophie Günther, Stephan Ölschläger, Stephan J Infect Dis Ebola Outbreak in West Africa Background. Diagnosis of Ebola virus (EBOV) disease (EVD) requires laboratory testing. Methods. The RealStar Filovirus Screen reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit and the derived RealStar Zaire Ebolavirus RT-PCR kit were validated using in vitro transcripts, supernatant of infected cell cultures, and clinical specimens from patients with EVD. Results. The Filovirus Screen kit detected EBOV, Sudan virus, Taï Forest virus, Bundibugyo virus, Reston virus, and Marburg virus and differentiated between the genera Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus. The amount of filovirus RNA that could be detected with a probability of 95% ranged from 11 to 67 RNA copies/reaction on a LightCycler 480 II. The Zaire Ebolavirus kit is based on the Filovirus Screen kit but was optimized for detection of EBOV. It has an improved signal-to-noise ratio at low EBOV RNA concentrations and is somewhat more sensitive than the Filovirus kit. Both kits show significantly lower analytical sensitivity on a SmartCycler II. Clinical evaluation revealed that the SmartCycler II, compared with other real-time PCR platforms, decreases the clinical sensitivity of the Filovirus Screen kit to diagnose EVD at an early stage. Conclusions. The Filovirus Screen kit detects all human-pathogenic filoviruses with good analytical sensitivity if performed on an appropriate real-time PCR platform. High analytical sensitivity is important for early diagnosis of EVD. Oxford University Press 2016-10-15 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050472/ /pubmed/27549586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw246 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Ebola Outbreak in West Africa
Rieger, Toni
Kerber, Romy
El Halas, Hussein
Pallasch, Elisa
Duraffour, Sophie
Günther, Stephan
Ölschläger, Stephan
Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title_full Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title_fullStr Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title_short Evaluation of RealStar Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction Kits for Filovirus Detection in the Laboratory and Field
title_sort evaluation of realstar reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction kits for filovirus detection in the laboratory and field
topic Ebola Outbreak in West Africa
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27549586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw246
work_keys_str_mv AT riegertoni evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT kerberromy evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT elhalashussein evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT pallaschelisa evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT duraffoursophie evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT guntherstephan evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield
AT olschlagerstephan evaluationofrealstarreversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactionkitsforfilovirusdetectioninthelaboratoryandfield