Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823 |
_version_ | 1782457894407503872 |
---|---|
author | Ding, Nan Pang, ZhaoFei Shen, Hongchang Ni, Yang Du, Jiajun Liu, Qi |
author_facet | Ding, Nan Pang, ZhaoFei Shen, Hongchang Ni, Yang Du, Jiajun Liu, Qi |
author_sort | Ding, Nan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between 2006 and 2011 in our hospital, and reviewed relevant articles from Embase, Pubmed, Web of science databases, then performed a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between PLR and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Finally, 11 articles with our study were included, results indicated elevated PLR was negatively related to overall survival (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.62), but not related to progress-free survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.49). Subgroup analysis suggested high PLR was correlated with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78), but not in small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.76–1.58). Besides, for patients treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15–2.38) and patients in late stage (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.19–1.68), PLR had significantly prognostic value. Additionally, the result was significant for patients when cut-off value of PLR was between 150 and 200 (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.18–1.82). In Conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed that elevated PLR was associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50505062016-10-11 The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort Ding, Nan Pang, ZhaoFei Shen, Hongchang Ni, Yang Du, Jiajun Liu, Qi Sci Rep Article Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between 2006 and 2011 in our hospital, and reviewed relevant articles from Embase, Pubmed, Web of science databases, then performed a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between PLR and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Finally, 11 articles with our study were included, results indicated elevated PLR was negatively related to overall survival (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.62), but not related to progress-free survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.49). Subgroup analysis suggested high PLR was correlated with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78), but not in small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.76–1.58). Besides, for patients treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15–2.38) and patients in late stage (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.19–1.68), PLR had significantly prognostic value. Additionally, the result was significant for patients when cut-off value of PLR was between 150 and 200 (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.18–1.82). In Conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed that elevated PLR was associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5050506/ /pubmed/27703265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Ding, Nan Pang, ZhaoFei Shen, Hongchang Ni, Yang Du, Jiajun Liu, Qi The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title | The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort |
title_sort | prognostic value of plr in lung cancer, a meta-analysis based on results from a large consecutive cohort |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dingnan theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT pangzhaofei theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT shenhongchang theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT niyang theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT dujiajun theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT liuqi theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT dingnan prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT pangzhaofei prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT shenhongchang prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT niyang prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT dujiajun prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort AT liuqi prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort |