Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort

Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Nan, Pang, ZhaoFei, Shen, Hongchang, Ni, Yang, Du, Jiajun, Liu, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823
_version_ 1782457894407503872
author Ding, Nan
Pang, ZhaoFei
Shen, Hongchang
Ni, Yang
Du, Jiajun
Liu, Qi
author_facet Ding, Nan
Pang, ZhaoFei
Shen, Hongchang
Ni, Yang
Du, Jiajun
Liu, Qi
author_sort Ding, Nan
collection PubMed
description Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between 2006 and 2011 in our hospital, and reviewed relevant articles from Embase, Pubmed, Web of science databases, then performed a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between PLR and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Finally, 11 articles with our study were included, results indicated elevated PLR was negatively related to overall survival (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.62), but not related to progress-free survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.49). Subgroup analysis suggested high PLR was correlated with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78), but not in small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.76–1.58). Besides, for patients treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15–2.38) and patients in late stage (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.19–1.68), PLR had significantly prognostic value. Additionally, the result was significant for patients when cut-off value of PLR was between 150 and 200 (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.18–1.82). In Conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed that elevated PLR was associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50505062016-10-11 The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort Ding, Nan Pang, ZhaoFei Shen, Hongchang Ni, Yang Du, Jiajun Liu, Qi Sci Rep Article Recently, many studies have been conducted to explore prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for patients with lung cancer, while the results remain controversial. We collected pretreatment, clinicopathological and follow-up data of 1388 lung cancer patients receiving surgery between 2006 and 2011 in our hospital, and reviewed relevant articles from Embase, Pubmed, Web of science databases, then performed a meta-analysis to clarify the relationship between PLR and prognosis of lung cancer patients. Finally, 11 articles with our study were included, results indicated elevated PLR was negatively related to overall survival (HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.10–1.62), but not related to progress-free survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.49). Subgroup analysis suggested high PLR was correlated with poor survival in non-small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14–1.78), but not in small cell lung cancer (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.76–1.58). Besides, for patients treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15–2.38) and patients in late stage (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.19–1.68), PLR had significantly prognostic value. Additionally, the result was significant for patients when cut-off value of PLR was between 150 and 200 (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.18–1.82). In Conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed that elevated PLR was associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5050506/ /pubmed/27703265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Ding, Nan
Pang, ZhaoFei
Shen, Hongchang
Ni, Yang
Du, Jiajun
Liu, Qi
The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title_full The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title_short The Prognostic Value of PLR in Lung Cancer, a Meta-analysis Based on Results from a Large Consecutive Cohort
title_sort prognostic value of plr in lung cancer, a meta-analysis based on results from a large consecutive cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34823
work_keys_str_mv AT dingnan theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT pangzhaofei theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT shenhongchang theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT niyang theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT dujiajun theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT liuqi theprognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT dingnan prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT pangzhaofei prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT shenhongchang prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT niyang prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT dujiajun prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort
AT liuqi prognosticvalueofplrinlungcancerametaanalysisbasedonresultsfromalargeconsecutivecohort