Cargando…

Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND: Although differences in the results of the bone marrow stimulation technique between the knee and ankle have been reported, a detailed mechanism for those differences has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to examine whether morphological differences between the knee and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makitsubo, Manami, Adachi, Nobuo, Nakasa, Tomoyuki, Kato, Tomohiro, Shimizu, Ryo, Ochi, Mitsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0444-4
_version_ 1782457906693668864
author Makitsubo, Manami
Adachi, Nobuo
Nakasa, Tomoyuki
Kato, Tomohiro
Shimizu, Ryo
Ochi, Mitsuo
author_facet Makitsubo, Manami
Adachi, Nobuo
Nakasa, Tomoyuki
Kato, Tomohiro
Shimizu, Ryo
Ochi, Mitsuo
author_sort Makitsubo, Manami
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although differences in the results of the bone marrow stimulation technique between the knee and ankle have been reported, a detailed mechanism for those differences has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to examine whether morphological differences between the knee and ankle joint affect the results of drilling as treatment for osteochondral defects in a rabbit model. METHODS: Osteochondral defects were created at the knee and ankle joint in the rabbit. In the knee, osteochondral defects were created at the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and patellar groove (PG). At the ankle, defects were created in the talus at either a covered or uncovered area by the tibial plafond. After creating the osteochondral defect, drilling was performed. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery, repair of the osteochondral defects were evaluated histologically. The proliferation of rabbit chondrocytes and proteoglycan release of cartilage tissue in response to IL-1β were analyzed in vitro in both joints. RESULTS: At 8 weeks after surgery, hyaline cartilage repair was observed in defects at the covered area of the talus and the MFC. At 12 weeks, hyaline cartilage with a normal thickness was observed for the defect at the covered area of the talus, but not for the defect at the MFC. At 12 weeks, subchondral bone formation progressed and a normal contour of subchondral bone was observed on CT in the defect at the covered area of the talus. No significant differences in chondrocyte proliferation rate and proteoglycan release were detected between the knee and ankle in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the covered areas of the talus show early and sufficient osteochondral repair compared to that of the knee and the uncovered areas of the talus. These results suggest that the congruent joint shows better subchondral repair prior to cartilage repair compared to that of the incongruent joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50505702016-10-06 Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model Makitsubo, Manami Adachi, Nobuo Nakasa, Tomoyuki Kato, Tomohiro Shimizu, Ryo Ochi, Mitsuo J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although differences in the results of the bone marrow stimulation technique between the knee and ankle have been reported, a detailed mechanism for those differences has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to examine whether morphological differences between the knee and ankle joint affect the results of drilling as treatment for osteochondral defects in a rabbit model. METHODS: Osteochondral defects were created at the knee and ankle joint in the rabbit. In the knee, osteochondral defects were created at the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and patellar groove (PG). At the ankle, defects were created in the talus at either a covered or uncovered area by the tibial plafond. After creating the osteochondral defect, drilling was performed. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery, repair of the osteochondral defects were evaluated histologically. The proliferation of rabbit chondrocytes and proteoglycan release of cartilage tissue in response to IL-1β were analyzed in vitro in both joints. RESULTS: At 8 weeks after surgery, hyaline cartilage repair was observed in defects at the covered area of the talus and the MFC. At 12 weeks, hyaline cartilage with a normal thickness was observed for the defect at the covered area of the talus, but not for the defect at the MFC. At 12 weeks, subchondral bone formation progressed and a normal contour of subchondral bone was observed on CT in the defect at the covered area of the talus. No significant differences in chondrocyte proliferation rate and proteoglycan release were detected between the knee and ankle in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the covered areas of the talus show early and sufficient osteochondral repair compared to that of the knee and the uncovered areas of the talus. These results suggest that the congruent joint shows better subchondral repair prior to cartilage repair compared to that of the incongruent joint. BioMed Central 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050570/ /pubmed/27716360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0444-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Makitsubo, Manami
Adachi, Nobuo
Nakasa, Tomoyuki
Kato, Tomohiro
Shimizu, Ryo
Ochi, Mitsuo
Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title_full Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title_fullStr Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title_full_unstemmed Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title_short Differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
title_sort differences in joint morphology between the knee and ankle affect the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0444-4
work_keys_str_mv AT makitsubomanami differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel
AT adachinobuo differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel
AT nakasatomoyuki differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel
AT katotomohiro differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel
AT shimizuryo differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel
AT ochimitsuo differencesinjointmorphologybetweenthekneeandankleaffecttherepairofosteochondraldefectsinarabbitmodel