Cargando…

A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth

BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iacono, Teresa, Stagg, Kellie, Pearce, Natalie, Hulme Chambers, Alana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x
_version_ 1782457914544357376
author Iacono, Teresa
Stagg, Kellie
Pearce, Natalie
Hulme Chambers, Alana
author_facet Iacono, Teresa
Stagg, Kellie
Pearce, Natalie
Hulme Chambers, Alana
author_sort Iacono, Teresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim of the study was to conduct a scoping review of studies into the application of or attitudes towards ehealth amongst allied health professionals conducted in Australia. METHODS: Studies meeting inclusion criteria published from January 2004 to June 2015 were reviewed. Professions included were audiology, dietetics, exercise physiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, social work, and speech pathology. Terms for these professions and forms of ehealth were combined in databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (1806 – Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and AMED (Ovid). RESULTS: Forty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria were summarised. They were either trials of aspects of ehealth service delivery, or clinician and/or client use of and attitudes towards ehealth. Trials of ehealth were largely from two research groups located at the Universities of Sydney and Queensland; most involved speech pathology and physiotherapy. Assessments through ehealth and intervention outcomes through ehealth were comparable with face-to-face delivery. Clinicians used ICT mostly for managing their work and for professional development, but were reticent about its use in service delivery, which contrasted with the more positive attitudes and experiences of clients. CONCLUSION: The potential of ehealth to address allied health needs of Australians living in rural and remote Australia appears unrealised. Clinicians may need to embrace ehealth as a means to radicalise practice, rather than replicate existing practices through a different mode of delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5050606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50506062016-10-05 A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth Iacono, Teresa Stagg, Kellie Pearce, Natalie Hulme Chambers, Alana BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim of the study was to conduct a scoping review of studies into the application of or attitudes towards ehealth amongst allied health professionals conducted in Australia. METHODS: Studies meeting inclusion criteria published from January 2004 to June 2015 were reviewed. Professions included were audiology, dietetics, exercise physiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, social work, and speech pathology. Terms for these professions and forms of ehealth were combined in databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (1806 – Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and AMED (Ovid). RESULTS: Forty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria were summarised. They were either trials of aspects of ehealth service delivery, or clinician and/or client use of and attitudes towards ehealth. Trials of ehealth were largely from two research groups located at the Universities of Sydney and Queensland; most involved speech pathology and physiotherapy. Assessments through ehealth and intervention outcomes through ehealth were comparable with face-to-face delivery. Clinicians used ICT mostly for managing their work and for professional development, but were reticent about its use in service delivery, which contrasted with the more positive attitudes and experiences of clients. CONCLUSION: The potential of ehealth to address allied health needs of Australians living in rural and remote Australia appears unrealised. Clinicians may need to embrace ehealth as a means to radicalise practice, rather than replicate existing practices through a different mode of delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050606/ /pubmed/27716325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iacono, Teresa
Stagg, Kellie
Pearce, Natalie
Hulme Chambers, Alana
A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title_full A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title_fullStr A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title_short A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
title_sort scoping review of australian allied health research in ehealth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x
work_keys_str_mv AT iaconoteresa ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT staggkellie ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT pearcenatalie ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT hulmechambersalana ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT iaconoteresa scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT staggkellie scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT pearcenatalie scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth
AT hulmechambersalana scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth