Cargando…
A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth
BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x |
_version_ | 1782457914544357376 |
---|---|
author | Iacono, Teresa Stagg, Kellie Pearce, Natalie Hulme Chambers, Alana |
author_facet | Iacono, Teresa Stagg, Kellie Pearce, Natalie Hulme Chambers, Alana |
author_sort | Iacono, Teresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim of the study was to conduct a scoping review of studies into the application of or attitudes towards ehealth amongst allied health professionals conducted in Australia. METHODS: Studies meeting inclusion criteria published from January 2004 to June 2015 were reviewed. Professions included were audiology, dietetics, exercise physiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, social work, and speech pathology. Terms for these professions and forms of ehealth were combined in databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (1806 – Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and AMED (Ovid). RESULTS: Forty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria were summarised. They were either trials of aspects of ehealth service delivery, or clinician and/or client use of and attitudes towards ehealth. Trials of ehealth were largely from two research groups located at the Universities of Sydney and Queensland; most involved speech pathology and physiotherapy. Assessments through ehealth and intervention outcomes through ehealth were comparable with face-to-face delivery. Clinicians used ICT mostly for managing their work and for professional development, but were reticent about its use in service delivery, which contrasted with the more positive attitudes and experiences of clients. CONCLUSION: The potential of ehealth to address allied health needs of Australians living in rural and remote Australia appears unrealised. Clinicians may need to embrace ehealth as a means to radicalise practice, rather than replicate existing practices through a different mode of delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50506062016-10-05 A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth Iacono, Teresa Stagg, Kellie Pearce, Natalie Hulme Chambers, Alana BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Uptake of e-health, the use of information communication technologies (ICT) for health service delivery, in allied health appears to be lagging behind other health care areas, despite offering the potential to address problems with service access by rural and remote Australians. The aim of the study was to conduct a scoping review of studies into the application of or attitudes towards ehealth amongst allied health professionals conducted in Australia. METHODS: Studies meeting inclusion criteria published from January 2004 to June 2015 were reviewed. Professions included were audiology, dietetics, exercise physiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, social work, and speech pathology. Terms for these professions and forms of ehealth were combined in databases of CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (1806 – Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and AMED (Ovid). RESULTS: Forty-four studies meeting inclusion criteria were summarised. They were either trials of aspects of ehealth service delivery, or clinician and/or client use of and attitudes towards ehealth. Trials of ehealth were largely from two research groups located at the Universities of Sydney and Queensland; most involved speech pathology and physiotherapy. Assessments through ehealth and intervention outcomes through ehealth were comparable with face-to-face delivery. Clinicians used ICT mostly for managing their work and for professional development, but were reticent about its use in service delivery, which contrasted with the more positive attitudes and experiences of clients. CONCLUSION: The potential of ehealth to address allied health needs of Australians living in rural and remote Australia appears unrealised. Clinicians may need to embrace ehealth as a means to radicalise practice, rather than replicate existing practices through a different mode of delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050606/ /pubmed/27716325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Iacono, Teresa Stagg, Kellie Pearce, Natalie Hulme Chambers, Alana A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title | A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title_full | A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title_short | A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth |
title_sort | scoping review of australian allied health research in ehealth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iaconoteresa ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT staggkellie ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT pearcenatalie ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT hulmechambersalana ascopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT iaconoteresa scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT staggkellie scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT pearcenatalie scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth AT hulmechambersalana scopingreviewofaustralianalliedhealthresearchinehealth |