Cargando…
Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: The success of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy depends significantly on how extent the acetabular fragment can be corrected to its optimal position. This study was undertaken to investigate whether correcting the acetabular fragment into the so-called radiological “normal” range is the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3 |
_version_ | 1782457938008342528 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xuyi Peng, Jianping Li, De Zhang, Linlin Wang, Hui Jiang, Leisheng Chen, Xiaodong |
author_facet | Wang, Xuyi Peng, Jianping Li, De Zhang, Linlin Wang, Hui Jiang, Leisheng Chen, Xiaodong |
author_sort | Wang, Xuyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The success of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy depends significantly on how extent the acetabular fragment can be corrected to its optimal position. This study was undertaken to investigate whether correcting the acetabular fragment into the so-called radiological “normal” range is the best choice for all developmental dysplasia of the hip with different severities of dysplasia from the biomechanical view? If not, is there any correlation between the biomechanically optimal position of the acetabular fragment and the severity of dysplasia? METHODS: Four finite element models with different severities of dysplasia were developed. The virtual periacetabular osteotomy was performed with the acetabular fragment rotated anterolaterally to incremental center-edge angles; then, the contact area and pressure and von Mises stress in the cartilage were calculated at different correction angles. RESULTS: The optimal position of the acetabular fragment for patients 1, 2, and 3 was when the acetabular fragment rotated 17° laterally (with the lateral center-edge angle of 36° and anterior center-edge angle of 58°; both were slightly larger than the “normal” range), 25° laterally following further 5° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 31° and anterior center-edge angle of 51°; both were within the “normal” range), and 30° laterally following further 10° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 25° and anterior center-edge angle of 40°; both were less than the “normal” range), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal corrective position of the acetabular fragment is severity dependent rather than within the radiological “normal” range for developmental dysplasia of the hip. We prudently proposed that the optimal correction center-edge angle of mild, moderate, and severe developmental dysplasia of the hip is slightly larger than the “normal” range, within the “normal” range, and less than the lower limit of the “normal” range, respectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5050724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50507242016-10-05 Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis Wang, Xuyi Peng, Jianping Li, De Zhang, Linlin Wang, Hui Jiang, Leisheng Chen, Xiaodong J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The success of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy depends significantly on how extent the acetabular fragment can be corrected to its optimal position. This study was undertaken to investigate whether correcting the acetabular fragment into the so-called radiological “normal” range is the best choice for all developmental dysplasia of the hip with different severities of dysplasia from the biomechanical view? If not, is there any correlation between the biomechanically optimal position of the acetabular fragment and the severity of dysplasia? METHODS: Four finite element models with different severities of dysplasia were developed. The virtual periacetabular osteotomy was performed with the acetabular fragment rotated anterolaterally to incremental center-edge angles; then, the contact area and pressure and von Mises stress in the cartilage were calculated at different correction angles. RESULTS: The optimal position of the acetabular fragment for patients 1, 2, and 3 was when the acetabular fragment rotated 17° laterally (with the lateral center-edge angle of 36° and anterior center-edge angle of 58°; both were slightly larger than the “normal” range), 25° laterally following further 5° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 31° and anterior center-edge angle of 51°; both were within the “normal” range), and 30° laterally following further 10° anterior rotation (with the lateral center-edge angle of 25° and anterior center-edge angle of 40°; both were less than the “normal” range), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal corrective position of the acetabular fragment is severity dependent rather than within the radiological “normal” range for developmental dysplasia of the hip. We prudently proposed that the optimal correction center-edge angle of mild, moderate, and severe developmental dysplasia of the hip is slightly larger than the “normal” range, within the “normal” range, and less than the lower limit of the “normal” range, respectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5050724/ /pubmed/27716351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Xuyi Peng, Jianping Li, De Zhang, Linlin Wang, Hui Jiang, Leisheng Chen, Xiaodong Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title | Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title_full | Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title_short | Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis |
title_sort | does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? a patient-specific finite element analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxuyi doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT pengjianping doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT lide doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT zhanglinlin doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT wanghui doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT jiangleisheng doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis AT chenxiaodong doestheoptimalpositionoftheacetabularfragmentshouldbewithintheradiologicalnormalrangeforalldevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipapatientspecificfiniteelementanalysis |