Cargando…

Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital

BACKGROUND: Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric FB and all FB lodged in the esophagus. We aim to report our experience on endoscopic foreign bodies (FB) removal in order to aid in the formation of future guidelines regarding this subject. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of one h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Eiad, Yacoub, Rabi, Raad, Dany, Hallman, Jason, Novak, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/gr517w
_version_ 1782458018326118400
author Nassar, Eiad
Yacoub, Rabi
Raad, Dany
Hallman, Jason
Novak, Jan
author_facet Nassar, Eiad
Yacoub, Rabi
Raad, Dany
Hallman, Jason
Novak, Jan
author_sort Nassar, Eiad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric FB and all FB lodged in the esophagus. We aim to report our experience on endoscopic foreign bodies (FB) removal in order to aid in the formation of future guidelines regarding this subject. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of one hundred forty-four cases of FB removal involving 43 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for FB removal from January 2005 through December 2010 in a university-based hospital. To evaluate to outcome of endoscopic FB removal, cost of procedures and complications. RESULTS: Of all FB removal cases, 23 (53%) were males, with total mean age of 26.4 ± 11.3 years. Only 20% were performed on an outpatient bases. Abdominal x-ray was obtained to confirm ingestion of FB in 83%, and computed tomography scan was performed in 13%. Most procedures were performed in operation room (59%) while only 21% of the cases were performed in endoscopy lab. General anesthesia was used in 58%, while monitored anesthesia care in 28%. Average time to EGD was 17.14 hours. No major complications due to procedure were reported. Minor trauma and erosions due to FB were reported in 14%. FB extraction was unsuccessful in only three cases, and one case required surgical intervention. Cost of all procedures was over 430, 000 dollars with mean of 2,990 dollars for procedure. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic retrieval is effective and safe procedure, but utilizes significant hospital resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50511132016-10-26 Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital Nassar, Eiad Yacoub, Rabi Raad, Dany Hallman, Jason Novak, Jan Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric FB and all FB lodged in the esophagus. We aim to report our experience on endoscopic foreign bodies (FB) removal in order to aid in the formation of future guidelines regarding this subject. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of one hundred forty-four cases of FB removal involving 43 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for FB removal from January 2005 through December 2010 in a university-based hospital. To evaluate to outcome of endoscopic FB removal, cost of procedures and complications. RESULTS: Of all FB removal cases, 23 (53%) were males, with total mean age of 26.4 ± 11.3 years. Only 20% were performed on an outpatient bases. Abdominal x-ray was obtained to confirm ingestion of FB in 83%, and computed tomography scan was performed in 13%. Most procedures were performed in operation room (59%) while only 21% of the cases were performed in endoscopy lab. General anesthesia was used in 58%, while monitored anesthesia care in 28%. Average time to EGD was 17.14 hours. No major complications due to procedure were reported. Minor trauma and erosions due to FB were reported in 14%. FB extraction was unsuccessful in only three cases, and one case required surgical intervention. Cost of all procedures was over 430, 000 dollars with mean of 2,990 dollars for procedure. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic retrieval is effective and safe procedure, but utilizes significant hospital resources. Elmer Press 2013-02 2013-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5051113/ /pubmed/27785219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/gr517w Text en Copyright 2013, Nassar et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nassar, Eiad
Yacoub, Rabi
Raad, Dany
Hallman, Jason
Novak, Jan
Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title_full Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title_fullStr Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title_short Foreign Body Endoscopy Experience of a University Based Hospital
title_sort foreign body endoscopy experience of a university based hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/gr517w
work_keys_str_mv AT nassareiad foreignbodyendoscopyexperienceofauniversitybasedhospital
AT yacoubrabi foreignbodyendoscopyexperienceofauniversitybasedhospital
AT raaddany foreignbodyendoscopyexperienceofauniversitybasedhospital
AT hallmanjason foreignbodyendoscopyexperienceofauniversitybasedhospital
AT novakjan foreignbodyendoscopyexperienceofauniversitybasedhospital