Cargando…

Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the oral dryness in postmenopausal women and to correlate the salivary flow rate determined by sialometry with the clinical oral dryness score (CODS) obtained from Challacombe Scale. To correlate between subjective and objective oral dryness and relatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera, Narayanan, Veena S., Khan, Asim M., Rakaraddi, Mangala P., Puttaswamy, Kavitha A., Puttabuddi, Jaishankar H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721638
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.191014
_version_ 1782458043125989376
author Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera
Narayanan, Veena S.
Khan, Asim M.
Rakaraddi, Mangala P.
Puttaswamy, Kavitha A.
Puttabuddi, Jaishankar H.
author_facet Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera
Narayanan, Veena S.
Khan, Asim M.
Rakaraddi, Mangala P.
Puttaswamy, Kavitha A.
Puttabuddi, Jaishankar H.
author_sort Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the oral dryness in postmenopausal women and to correlate the salivary flow rate determined by sialometry with the clinical oral dryness score (CODS) obtained from Challacombe Scale. To correlate between subjective and objective oral dryness and relationship of salivary flow rate with that of the duration of menopause. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty postmenopausal women were questioned regarding their oral dryness status and the duration of menopause. Patients complaining of xerostomia formed the case group and rest formed the control group. CODS was assessed based on the 10 features of oral dryness. Unstimulated whole salivary (UWS) flow rate was assessed by sialometry for 5 min. RESULTS: Highly significant negative correlation was observed between UWS and CODS (r = −0.651), low negative correlation was noted between the duration of menopause and UWS flow rates (r = −0.159), and no significant correlation was found between subjective oral dryness with that of UWS flow rates (P = 0.0964). There was no statistically significant difference between case and control group with regard to CODS (P = 0.525). CONCLUSION: A good correlation of CODS with sialometry scores indicates that CODS can be utilized for semiquantitative assessment of oral dryness. It appears that UWS has poor correlation with duration of menopause. Xerostomia and UWS were not significantly related.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50512302016-10-07 Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera Narayanan, Veena S. Khan, Asim M. Rakaraddi, Mangala P. Puttaswamy, Kavitha A. Puttabuddi, Jaishankar H. J Midlife Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the oral dryness in postmenopausal women and to correlate the salivary flow rate determined by sialometry with the clinical oral dryness score (CODS) obtained from Challacombe Scale. To correlate between subjective and objective oral dryness and relationship of salivary flow rate with that of the duration of menopause. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty postmenopausal women were questioned regarding their oral dryness status and the duration of menopause. Patients complaining of xerostomia formed the case group and rest formed the control group. CODS was assessed based on the 10 features of oral dryness. Unstimulated whole salivary (UWS) flow rate was assessed by sialometry for 5 min. RESULTS: Highly significant negative correlation was observed between UWS and CODS (r = −0.651), low negative correlation was noted between the duration of menopause and UWS flow rates (r = −0.159), and no significant correlation was found between subjective oral dryness with that of UWS flow rates (P = 0.0964). There was no statistically significant difference between case and control group with regard to CODS (P = 0.525). CONCLUSION: A good correlation of CODS with sialometry scores indicates that CODS can be utilized for semiquantitative assessment of oral dryness. It appears that UWS has poor correlation with duration of menopause. Xerostomia and UWS were not significantly related. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5051230/ /pubmed/27721638 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.191014 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chengappa, Rachita Kodandera
Narayanan, Veena S.
Khan, Asim M.
Rakaraddi, Mangala P.
Puttaswamy, Kavitha A.
Puttabuddi, Jaishankar H.
Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title_full Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title_fullStr Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title_short Utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
title_sort utility of two methodologies in the clinical assessment of oral dryness in postmenopausal women
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27721638
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.191014
work_keys_str_mv AT chengapparachitakodandera utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen
AT narayananveenas utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen
AT khanasimm utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen
AT rakaraddimangalap utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen
AT puttaswamykavithaa utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen
AT puttabuddijaishankarh utilityoftwomethodologiesintheclinicalassessmentoforaldrynessinpostmenopausalwomen