Cargando…

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members

OBJECTIVE: The ethicists believe that the goal of clinical research is to benefit future and not current (trial) patients. Many clinicians believe that the clinical trial enrolment offers best management for their patients. The objective of our study was to identify the situations when a clinical tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mhaskar, Rahul, Miladinovic, Branko, Guterbock, Thomas M, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011150
_version_ 1782458062987067392
author Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Guterbock, Thomas M
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
author_facet Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Guterbock, Thomas M
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
author_sort Mhaskar, Rahul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The ethicists believe that the goal of clinical research is to benefit future and not current (trial) patients. Many clinicians believe that the clinical trial enrolment offers best management for their patients. The objective of our study was to identify the situations when a clinical trial is beneficial for the patients enrolled in the trial and future patients. DESIGN: Factorial vignette-based cross-sectional survey via the internet. PARTICIPANTS: Institutional review board (IRB) members of the US Medical Schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Each participant was invited to review 9 clinical vignettes related to (1) study approval and (2) the assessment if the study is designed to help future or current patients more. RESULTS: A total of 232 IRB members from 42 institutions participated. When considering approval of the trial, we found that uncertainty about treatment effects (OR=1.13; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.19) and requirement for continuation of standard therapy (OR=3.84; 95% CI 2.7 to 5.55) were the only statistically significant factors affecting IRB members' decisions to approve the study. The odds of IRB members approving a trial increased when a trial proposed to enrol patients with life-threatening versus chronic debilitating disease (OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.86). We also found that similar factors affected judgements related to the assessment whether the trial will benefit future or current patients more—(1) future patients: uncertainty (OR=1.27; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.37); continuation of standard treatment (OR=1.66; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.56); seriousness of condition (OR=1.78; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.28); (2) current patients: uncertainty (OR=1.54; 95% CI 1.4 to 1.7); continuation of standard therapy (OR=2.17; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.44). CONCLUSIONS: IRB members view the proposed studies to be beneficial for current patients and future patients if there is uncertainty regarding treatment effects and if studies do not require stopping the current treatment. This finding supports the design and use of pragmatic trials which may reduce therapeutic misconception and improve trial enrolment, speeding up therapeutic discoveries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50513242016-10-17 When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members Mhaskar, Rahul Miladinovic, Branko Guterbock, Thomas M Djulbegovic, Benjamin BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: The ethicists believe that the goal of clinical research is to benefit future and not current (trial) patients. Many clinicians believe that the clinical trial enrolment offers best management for their patients. The objective of our study was to identify the situations when a clinical trial is beneficial for the patients enrolled in the trial and future patients. DESIGN: Factorial vignette-based cross-sectional survey via the internet. PARTICIPANTS: Institutional review board (IRB) members of the US Medical Schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Each participant was invited to review 9 clinical vignettes related to (1) study approval and (2) the assessment if the study is designed to help future or current patients more. RESULTS: A total of 232 IRB members from 42 institutions participated. When considering approval of the trial, we found that uncertainty about treatment effects (OR=1.13; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.19) and requirement for continuation of standard therapy (OR=3.84; 95% CI 2.7 to 5.55) were the only statistically significant factors affecting IRB members' decisions to approve the study. The odds of IRB members approving a trial increased when a trial proposed to enrol patients with life-threatening versus chronic debilitating disease (OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.86). We also found that similar factors affected judgements related to the assessment whether the trial will benefit future or current patients more—(1) future patients: uncertainty (OR=1.27; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.37); continuation of standard treatment (OR=1.66; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.56); seriousness of condition (OR=1.78; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.28); (2) current patients: uncertainty (OR=1.54; 95% CI 1.4 to 1.7); continuation of standard therapy (OR=2.17; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.44). CONCLUSIONS: IRB members view the proposed studies to be beneficial for current patients and future patients if there is uncertainty regarding treatment effects and if studies do not require stopping the current treatment. This finding supports the design and use of pragmatic trials which may reduce therapeutic misconception and improve trial enrolment, speeding up therapeutic discoveries. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5051324/ /pubmed/27683511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011150 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ethics
Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Guterbock, Thomas M
Djulbegovic, Benjamin
When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title_full When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title_fullStr When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title_full_unstemmed When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title_short When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
title_sort when are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? a factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011150
work_keys_str_mv AT mhaskarrahul whenareclinicaltrialsbeneficialforstudypatientsandfuturepatientsafactorialvignettebasedsurveyofinstitutionalreviewboardmembers
AT miladinovicbranko whenareclinicaltrialsbeneficialforstudypatientsandfuturepatientsafactorialvignettebasedsurveyofinstitutionalreviewboardmembers
AT guterbockthomasm whenareclinicaltrialsbeneficialforstudypatientsandfuturepatientsafactorialvignettebasedsurveyofinstitutionalreviewboardmembers
AT djulbegovicbenjamin whenareclinicaltrialsbeneficialforstudypatientsandfuturepatientsafactorialvignettebasedsurveyofinstitutionalreviewboardmembers