Cargando…

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members

OBJECTIVE: The ethicists believe that the goal of clinical research is to benefit future and not current (trial) patients. Many clinicians believe that the clinical trial enrolment offers best management for their patients. The objective of our study was to identify the situations when a clinical tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mhaskar, Rahul, Miladinovic, Branko, Guterbock, Thomas M, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011150

Ejemplares similares

Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Institutional review boards: Challenges and opportunities
por: Ghooi, Ravindra B.
Publicado: (2014)

Are institutional review boards prepared for active continuing review?
por: Shetty, Yashashri C., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

At What Level of Collective Equipoise Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Become Ethical for the Members of Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committees?
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wao, Hesborn, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Benchmarks for detecting ‘breakthroughs’ in clinical trials: empirical assessment of the probability of large treatment effects using kernel density estimation
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Flexible Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Assessing the Prognostic Accuracy of Hospice Patient Survival
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

2543: Participatory development of a CTSA-wide Community Advisory Board: Enhancing community engagement at the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research
por: Delva, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cross-sectional analysis of pharmaceutical payments to Japanese board-certified gastroenterologists between 2016 and 2019
por: Murayama, Anju, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Doctors’ perspectives on adhering to advance care directives when making medical decisions for patients: an Australian interview study
por: Moore, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How do community advisory boards fulfil their ethical role in HIV clinical trials? A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence
por: Pancras, Godwin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study
por: Bachelet, Vivienne C, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
por: Shearman, Kirstie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Factors contributing to practitioner choice when declining involvement in legally available care: A scoping protocol
por: Brown, Janine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Strzebonska, Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effects of a Dedicated Regional Psychiatric Emergency Service on Boarding of Psychiatric Patients in Area Emergency Departments
por: Zeller, Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Institutional review board training when patients and community members are engaged as researchers
por: Westfall, John M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey
por: Dibao-Dina, Clarisse, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Points for Members of Parliament
Publicado: (1919)

CARING FUTURES: a study protocol for transdisciplinary qualitative research on technology-mediated care practices and theory development for ethics of care
por: Ramvi, Ellen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Exploring the Legacies of Filmed Patient Narratives: The Interpretation and Appropriation of Patient Films by Health Care Staff
por: Adams, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Patients’ silence towards the healthcare system after ethical transgressions by staff: associations with patient characteristics in a cross-sectional study among Swedish female patients
por: Brüggemann, A Jelmer, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Communication About Complementary and Alternative Medicine When Patients Decline Conventional Cancer Treatment: Patients’ and Physicians’ Experiences
por: Wode, Kathrin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management
por: Cho, Alyssa H., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Instrumental variable meta-analysis of individual patient data: application to adjust for treatment non-compliance
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Assessing psychiatric safety in suicidal emergency department patients
por: Brenner, Jay M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Patients’ Experiences With HIV-positive to HIV-positive Organ Transplantation
por: Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

‘Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life’. Benefits and risks in patient partner–researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners’ experiences in a Canadian health research setting
por: Leese, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Kidney Dyads: Caregiver Burden and Relationship Strain Among Partners of Dialysis and Transplant Patients
por: Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rapid commentary: Ethical implications for clinical trialists and patients associated with COVID-19 research
por: Delanerolle, Gayathri, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment Success in Cancer: Industry Compared to Publicly Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers and Researchers on Research Priorities in Donation and Transplantation in Canada: A Pilot Workshop
por: Allard, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Are patients accurate forecasters of their emotional response to medical conditions? A scoping review on affective forecasting
por: van den Bosch, G J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study
por: Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

‘Lines in the sand’: an Australian qualitative study of patient group practices to promote independence from pharmaceutical industry funders
por: Parker, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis
por: O'Sullivan, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Best Case/Worst Case: protocol for a multisite randomised clinical trial of a scenario planning intervention for patients with kidney failure
por: Haug, Karlie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Developing a typology of the roles public contributors undertake to establish legitimacy: a longitudinal case study of patient and public involvement in a health network
por: Barker, Jacqueline, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Recommendation‐making in the emergency department: A qualitative study of how Canadian emergency physicians guide treatment decisions about resuscitation in critically ill patients
por: Ajzenberg, Henry, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_dsq44c5f1ra14mvc18uslop8mo