Cargando…

Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions for reductions in repeated self-harm. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression to examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions to reduce repeat self-harm in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hetrick, Sarah E, Robinson, Jo, Spittal, Matthew J, Carter, Greg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011024
_version_ 1782458064570417152
author Hetrick, Sarah E
Robinson, Jo
Spittal, Matthew J
Carter, Greg
author_facet Hetrick, Sarah E
Robinson, Jo
Spittal, Matthew J
Carter, Greg
author_sort Hetrick, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions for reductions in repeated self-harm. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression to examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions to reduce repeat self-harm in adults. We included a sensitivity analysis of studies with a low risk of bias for the meta-analysis. For the meta-regression, we examined whether the type, intensity (primary analyses) and other components of intervention or methodology (secondary analyses) modified the overall intervention effect. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycInfo and EMBASE (from 1999 to June 2016) was performed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for adult self-harm patients. RESULTS: Forty-five trials were included with data available from 36 (7354 participants) for the primary analysis. Meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of all psychological and psychosocial interventions combined (risk ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96; number needed to treat=33); however, sensitivity analyses showed that this benefit was non-significant when restricted to a limited number of high-quality studies. Meta-regression showed that the type of intervention did not modify the treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of a psychological or psychosocial intervention over and above treatment as usual is worthwhile; with the public health benefits of ensuring that this practice is widely adopted potentially worth the investment. However, the specific type and nature of the intervention that should be delivered is not yet clear. Cognitive–behavioural therapy or interventions with an interpersonal focus and targeted on the precipitants to self-harm may be the best candidates on the current evidence. Further research is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50513312016-10-17 Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression Hetrick, Sarah E Robinson, Jo Spittal, Matthew J Carter, Greg BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions for reductions in repeated self-harm. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression to examine the efficacy of psychological and psychosocial interventions to reduce repeat self-harm in adults. We included a sensitivity analysis of studies with a low risk of bias for the meta-analysis. For the meta-regression, we examined whether the type, intensity (primary analyses) and other components of intervention or methodology (secondary analyses) modified the overall intervention effect. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PsycInfo and EMBASE (from 1999 to June 2016) was performed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for adult self-harm patients. RESULTS: Forty-five trials were included with data available from 36 (7354 participants) for the primary analysis. Meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of all psychological and psychosocial interventions combined (risk ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96; number needed to treat=33); however, sensitivity analyses showed that this benefit was non-significant when restricted to a limited number of high-quality studies. Meta-regression showed that the type of intervention did not modify the treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of a psychological or psychosocial intervention over and above treatment as usual is worthwhile; with the public health benefits of ensuring that this practice is widely adopted potentially worth the investment. However, the specific type and nature of the intervention that should be delivered is not yet clear. Cognitive–behavioural therapy or interventions with an interpersonal focus and targeted on the precipitants to self-harm may be the best candidates on the current evidence. Further research is required. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5051331/ /pubmed/27660314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011024 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Hetrick, Sarah E
Robinson, Jo
Spittal, Matthew J
Carter, Greg
Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_fullStr Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_full_unstemmed Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_short Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
title_sort effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27660314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011024
work_keys_str_mv AT hetricksarahe effectivepsychologicalandpsychosocialapproachestoreducerepetitionofselfharmasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT robinsonjo effectivepsychologicalandpsychosocialapproachestoreducerepetitionofselfharmasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT spittalmatthewj effectivepsychologicalandpsychosocialapproachestoreducerepetitionofselfharmasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT cartergreg effectivepsychologicalandpsychosocialapproachestoreducerepetitionofselfharmasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression