Cargando…

Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a proactive approach with a reactive approach to offer intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN: Before–after comparison in 2 academic hospitals with parallel comparisons in 2 control hospitals. SETTING: Academic hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auer, Reto, Gencer, Baris, Tango, Rodrigo, Nanchen, David, Matter, Christian M, Lüscher, Thomas Felix, Windecker, Stephan, Mach, François, Cornuz, Jacques, Humair, Jean-Paul, Rodondi, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27650761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011520
_version_ 1782458072082415616
author Auer, Reto
Gencer, Baris
Tango, Rodrigo
Nanchen, David
Matter, Christian M
Lüscher, Thomas Felix
Windecker, Stephan
Mach, François
Cornuz, Jacques
Humair, Jean-Paul
Rodondi, Nicolas
author_facet Auer, Reto
Gencer, Baris
Tango, Rodrigo
Nanchen, David
Matter, Christian M
Lüscher, Thomas Felix
Windecker, Stephan
Mach, François
Cornuz, Jacques
Humair, Jean-Paul
Rodondi, Nicolas
author_sort Auer, Reto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a proactive approach with a reactive approach to offer intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN: Before–after comparison in 2 academic hospitals with parallel comparisons in 2 control hospitals. SETTING: Academic hospitals in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). INTERVENTION: In the intervention hospitals during the intervention phase, a resident physician trained in MI systematically offered counselling to all smokers admitted for ACS, followed by 4 telephone counselling sessions over 2 months by a nurse trained in MI. In the observation phase, the in-hospital intervention was offered only to patients whose clinicians requested a smoking cessation intervention. In the control hospitals, no intensive smoking cessation intervention was offered. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was 1 week smoking abstinence (point prevalence) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the number of smokers who received the in-hospital smoking cessation intervention and the duration of the intervention. RESULTS: In the intervention centres during the intervention phase, 87% of smokers (N=193/225) received a smoking cessation intervention compared to 22% in the observational phase (p<0.001). Median duration of counselling was 50 min. During the intervention phase, 78% received a phone follow-up for a median total duration of 42 min in 4 sessions. Prescription of nicotine replacement therapy at discharge increased from 18% to 58% in the intervention phase (risk ratio (RR): 3.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.3; p≤0.001). Smoking cessation at 12-month increased from 43% to 51% comparing the observation and intervention phases (RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.46; p=0.08; 97% with outcome assessment). In the control hospitals, the RR for quitting was 1.02 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.25; p=0.8, 92% with outcome assessment). CONCLUSIONS: A proactive strategy offering intensive smoking cessation intervention based on MI to all smokers hospitalised for ACS significantly increases the uptake of smoking cessation counselling and might increase smoking abstinence at 12 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50514012016-10-17 Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons Auer, Reto Gencer, Baris Tango, Rodrigo Nanchen, David Matter, Christian M Lüscher, Thomas Felix Windecker, Stephan Mach, François Cornuz, Jacques Humair, Jean-Paul Rodondi, Nicolas BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of a proactive approach with a reactive approach to offer intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing (MI). DESIGN: Before–after comparison in 2 academic hospitals with parallel comparisons in 2 control hospitals. SETTING: Academic hospitals in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). INTERVENTION: In the intervention hospitals during the intervention phase, a resident physician trained in MI systematically offered counselling to all smokers admitted for ACS, followed by 4 telephone counselling sessions over 2 months by a nurse trained in MI. In the observation phase, the in-hospital intervention was offered only to patients whose clinicians requested a smoking cessation intervention. In the control hospitals, no intensive smoking cessation intervention was offered. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was 1 week smoking abstinence (point prevalence) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the number of smokers who received the in-hospital smoking cessation intervention and the duration of the intervention. RESULTS: In the intervention centres during the intervention phase, 87% of smokers (N=193/225) received a smoking cessation intervention compared to 22% in the observational phase (p<0.001). Median duration of counselling was 50 min. During the intervention phase, 78% received a phone follow-up for a median total duration of 42 min in 4 sessions. Prescription of nicotine replacement therapy at discharge increased from 18% to 58% in the intervention phase (risk ratio (RR): 3.3 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.3; p≤0.001). Smoking cessation at 12-month increased from 43% to 51% comparing the observation and intervention phases (RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.46; p=0.08; 97% with outcome assessment). In the control hospitals, the RR for quitting was 1.02 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.25; p=0.8, 92% with outcome assessment). CONCLUSIONS: A proactive strategy offering intensive smoking cessation intervention based on MI to all smokers hospitalised for ACS significantly increases the uptake of smoking cessation counselling and might increase smoking abstinence at 12 months. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5051401/ /pubmed/27650761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011520 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Smoking and Tobacco
Auer, Reto
Gencer, Baris
Tango, Rodrigo
Nanchen, David
Matter, Christian M
Lüscher, Thomas Felix
Windecker, Stephan
Mach, François
Cornuz, Jacques
Humair, Jean-Paul
Rodondi, Nicolas
Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title_full Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title_fullStr Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title_short Uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
title_sort uptake and efficacy of a systematic intensive smoking cessation intervention using motivational interviewing for smokers hospitalised for an acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre before–after study with parallel group comparisons
topic Smoking and Tobacco
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27650761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011520
work_keys_str_mv AT auerreto uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT gencerbaris uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT tangorodrigo uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT nanchendavid uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT matterchristianm uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT luscherthomasfelix uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT windeckerstephan uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT machfrancois uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT cornuzjacques uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT humairjeanpaul uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons
AT rodondinicolas uptakeandefficacyofasystematicintensivesmokingcessationinterventionusingmotivationalinterviewingforsmokershospitalisedforanacutecoronarysyndromeamulticentrebeforeafterstudywithparallelgroupcomparisons