Cargando…

Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency

Severe sepsis is a clinical emergency. Despite the nationwide recognition of the sepsis six treatment bundle as the first line emergency treatment for this presentation, compliance in sepsis six provision remains inadequately low. The project goals were to improve compliance with the implementation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinnington, Sarah, Atterton, Brigid, Ingleby, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u210706.w4335
_version_ 1782458075163131904
author Pinnington, Sarah
Atterton, Brigid
Ingleby, Sarah
author_facet Pinnington, Sarah
Atterton, Brigid
Ingleby, Sarah
author_sort Pinnington, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Severe sepsis is a clinical emergency. Despite the nationwide recognition of the sepsis six treatment bundle as the first line emergency treatment for this presentation, compliance in sepsis six provision remains inadequately low. The project goals were to improve compliance with the implementation of the Sepsis Six in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. In improving timely care delivery it was anticipated improvements would be made in relation to patient safety and experience, and reductions in length of stay (LoS) and mortality. The project intended to make the pathway for those presenting with sepsis safe and consistent, where sepsis is recognised and treated in a timely manner according to best practice. The aim of the project was to understand the what the barriers where to providing safe effective care for the patient presenting with severe sepsis in A&E. Using the Safer Clinical Systems (SCS) tools developed byte Health Foundation and Warwick University, the project team identified the hazards and associated risks in the septic patient pathway. The level of analysis employed enabled the project team to identify the major risks, themes, and factors of influence within this pathway. The analysis identified twenty nine possible interventions, of which six were chosen following option appraisal. Further interventions were recommended to the accident and emergency as part of a business case and further changes in process. Audits identified all severely septic patients presenting to A&E in October 2014 (n=67) and post intervention in September 2015 (n=93). Compared analysis demonstrated an increase in compliance with the implementation of the sepsis six care bundle from 7% to 41%, a reduction in LoS by 1.9 days and a decrease in 30 day mortality by 50%. Additional audit reviewed the management of 10 septic patients per week for the duration of the project to assess the real time impact of the selected interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher British Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50514212016-10-17 Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency Pinnington, Sarah Atterton, Brigid Ingleby, Sarah BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Severe sepsis is a clinical emergency. Despite the nationwide recognition of the sepsis six treatment bundle as the first line emergency treatment for this presentation, compliance in sepsis six provision remains inadequately low. The project goals were to improve compliance with the implementation of the Sepsis Six in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. In improving timely care delivery it was anticipated improvements would be made in relation to patient safety and experience, and reductions in length of stay (LoS) and mortality. The project intended to make the pathway for those presenting with sepsis safe and consistent, where sepsis is recognised and treated in a timely manner according to best practice. The aim of the project was to understand the what the barriers where to providing safe effective care for the patient presenting with severe sepsis in A&E. Using the Safer Clinical Systems (SCS) tools developed byte Health Foundation and Warwick University, the project team identified the hazards and associated risks in the septic patient pathway. The level of analysis employed enabled the project team to identify the major risks, themes, and factors of influence within this pathway. The analysis identified twenty nine possible interventions, of which six were chosen following option appraisal. Further interventions were recommended to the accident and emergency as part of a business case and further changes in process. Audits identified all severely septic patients presenting to A&E in October 2014 (n=67) and post intervention in September 2015 (n=93). Compared analysis demonstrated an increase in compliance with the implementation of the sepsis six care bundle from 7% to 41%, a reduction in LoS by 1.9 days and a decrease in 30 day mortality by 50%. Additional audit reviewed the management of 10 septic patients per week for the duration of the project to assess the real time impact of the selected interventions. British Publishing Group 2016-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5051421/ /pubmed/27752314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u210706.w4335 Text en © 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode
spellingShingle BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
Pinnington, Sarah
Atterton, Brigid
Ingleby, Sarah
Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title_full Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title_fullStr Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title_full_unstemmed Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title_short Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
title_sort making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency
topic BMJ Quality Improvement Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u210706.w4335
work_keys_str_mv AT pinningtonsarah makingthejourneysaferecognisingandrespondingtoseveresepsisinaccidentandemergency
AT attertonbrigid makingthejourneysaferecognisingandrespondingtoseveresepsisinaccidentandemergency
AT inglebysarah makingthejourneysaferecognisingandrespondingtoseveresepsisinaccidentandemergency