Cargando…

Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK

OBJECTIVE: To explore communication and interaction between parents and clinicians following neonatal ultrasound (US) and MRI of the brain of babies born preterm. SETTING: This qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger UK study of neonatal brain imaging. 511 infants were cared for in 14 L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvey, M E, Redshaw, M E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011472
_version_ 1782458082036547584
author Harvey, M E
Redshaw, M E
author_facet Harvey, M E
Redshaw, M E
author_sort Harvey, M E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore communication and interaction between parents and clinicians following neonatal ultrasound (US) and MRI of the brain of babies born preterm. SETTING: This qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger UK study of neonatal brain imaging. 511 infants were cared for in 14 London neonatal units with MR and cerebral US imaging in a specialist centre. PARTICIPANTS: Parents with infants born at <33 weeks gestation were randomised to receive prognostic information based on either MRI or US findings on their infants at term-corrected age. METHODS: Discussions between parents and clinicians about the MRI or US result were audio recorded. Parents were told about the findings and their baby's predicted outcome. A topic guide ensured essential aspects were covered. Recordings were fully transcribed. Discussion of the scan results, the content and style of the interaction and parental response were analysed qualitatively in 36 recordings using NVivo V.10. OUTCOMES: Key themes and subthemes were identified in the clinician–parent discussions. RESULTS: The overarching theme of ‘the communication interface’ was identified with three key themes: ‘giving information’, ‘managing the conversation’ and ‘getting it right’ and further subthemes. A range of approaches were used to facilitate parental understanding and engagement. There were differences in the exchanges when information about an abnormal scan was given. The overall structure of the discussions was largely similar, though the language used varied. In all of the discussions, the clinicians talked more than the parents. CONCLUSIONS: The discussions represent a difficult situation in which the challenge is to give and receive complex prognostic information in the context of considerable uncertainty. The study highlights the importance of being able to re-visit specific issues and any potential areas of misunderstanding, of making time to talk to parents appreciating their perspective and level of knowledge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2009-013888-19; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50514652016-10-17 Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK Harvey, M E Redshaw, M E BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To explore communication and interaction between parents and clinicians following neonatal ultrasound (US) and MRI of the brain of babies born preterm. SETTING: This qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger UK study of neonatal brain imaging. 511 infants were cared for in 14 London neonatal units with MR and cerebral US imaging in a specialist centre. PARTICIPANTS: Parents with infants born at <33 weeks gestation were randomised to receive prognostic information based on either MRI or US findings on their infants at term-corrected age. METHODS: Discussions between parents and clinicians about the MRI or US result were audio recorded. Parents were told about the findings and their baby's predicted outcome. A topic guide ensured essential aspects were covered. Recordings were fully transcribed. Discussion of the scan results, the content and style of the interaction and parental response were analysed qualitatively in 36 recordings using NVivo V.10. OUTCOMES: Key themes and subthemes were identified in the clinician–parent discussions. RESULTS: The overarching theme of ‘the communication interface’ was identified with three key themes: ‘giving information’, ‘managing the conversation’ and ‘getting it right’ and further subthemes. A range of approaches were used to facilitate parental understanding and engagement. There were differences in the exchanges when information about an abnormal scan was given. The overall structure of the discussions was largely similar, though the language used varied. In all of the discussions, the clinicians talked more than the parents. CONCLUSIONS: The discussions represent a difficult situation in which the challenge is to give and receive complex prognostic information in the context of considerable uncertainty. The study highlights the importance of being able to re-visit specific issues and any potential areas of misunderstanding, of making time to talk to parents appreciating their perspective and level of knowledge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2009-013888-19; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5051465/ /pubmed/27678531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011472 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Harvey, M E
Redshaw, M E
Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title_full Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title_fullStr Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title_short Qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following MRI and US imaging of preterm infants in the UK
title_sort qualitative study of the clinician–parent interface in discussing prognosis following mri and us imaging of preterm infants in the uk
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011472
work_keys_str_mv AT harveyme qualitativestudyoftheclinicianparentinterfaceindiscussingprognosisfollowingmriandusimagingofpreterminfantsintheuk
AT redshawme qualitativestudyoftheclinicianparentinterfaceindiscussingprognosisfollowingmriandusimagingofpreterminfantsintheuk