Cargando…

Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of healthcare services are a vulnerable population, often socioeconomically disadvantaged, who can present multiple chronic conditions as well as mental health problems. Case management (CM) is the most frequently performed intervention to reduce healthcare use and cost. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudon, Catherine, Chouinard, Maud-Christine, Lambert, Mireille, Dufour, Isabelle, Krieg, Cynthia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353
_version_ 1782458088153939968
author Hudon, Catherine
Chouinard, Maud-Christine
Lambert, Mireille
Dufour, Isabelle
Krieg, Cynthia
author_facet Hudon, Catherine
Chouinard, Maud-Christine
Lambert, Mireille
Dufour, Isabelle
Krieg, Cynthia
author_sort Hudon, Catherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of healthcare services are a vulnerable population, often socioeconomically disadvantaged, who can present multiple chronic conditions as well as mental health problems. Case management (CM) is the most frequently performed intervention to reduce healthcare use and cost. This study aimed to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of CM interventions for frequent users of healthcare services. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL databases covering January 2004 to December 2015. A specific search strategy was developed for each database using keywords ‘case management’ and ‘frequent use’. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: To be included in the review, studies had to report effects of a CM intervention on healthcare use and cost or patient outcomes. Eligible designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and controlled and non-controlled before–after studies. Studies limited to specific groups of patients or targeting a single disease were excluded. Three reviewers screened abstracts, screened each full-text article and extracted data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The final review included 11 articles evaluating the effectiveness of CM interventions among frequent users of healthcare services. Two non-randomised controlled studies and 4 before–after studies reported positives outcomes on healthcare use or cost. Two randomised controlled trials, 2 before–after studies and 1 non-randomised controlled study presented mitigated results. Patient outcomes such as drug and alcohol use, health locus of control, patient satisfaction and psychological functioning were evaluated in 3 studies, but no change was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies suggest that CM could reduce emergency department visits and hospitalisations as well as cost. However, pragmatic randomised controlled trials of adequate power that recruit the most frequent users of healthcare services are still needed to clearly confirm its effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50514912016-10-17 Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review Hudon, Catherine Chouinard, Maud-Christine Lambert, Mireille Dufour, Isabelle Krieg, Cynthia BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Frequent users of healthcare services are a vulnerable population, often socioeconomically disadvantaged, who can present multiple chronic conditions as well as mental health problems. Case management (CM) is the most frequently performed intervention to reduce healthcare use and cost. This study aimed to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of CM interventions for frequent users of healthcare services. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: An electronic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL databases covering January 2004 to December 2015. A specific search strategy was developed for each database using keywords ‘case management’ and ‘frequent use’. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: To be included in the review, studies had to report effects of a CM intervention on healthcare use and cost or patient outcomes. Eligible designs included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and controlled and non-controlled before–after studies. Studies limited to specific groups of patients or targeting a single disease were excluded. Three reviewers screened abstracts, screened each full-text article and extracted data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: The final review included 11 articles evaluating the effectiveness of CM interventions among frequent users of healthcare services. Two non-randomised controlled studies and 4 before–after studies reported positives outcomes on healthcare use or cost. Two randomised controlled trials, 2 before–after studies and 1 non-randomised controlled study presented mitigated results. Patient outcomes such as drug and alcohol use, health locus of control, patient satisfaction and psychological functioning were evaluated in 3 studies, but no change was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Many studies suggest that CM could reduce emergency department visits and hospitalisations as well as cost. However, pragmatic randomised controlled trials of adequate power that recruit the most frequent users of healthcare services are still needed to clearly confirm its effectiveness. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5051491/ /pubmed/27687900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hudon, Catherine
Chouinard, Maud-Christine
Lambert, Mireille
Dufour, Isabelle
Krieg, Cynthia
Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title_full Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title_short Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
title_sort effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353
work_keys_str_mv AT hudoncatherine effectivenessofcasemanagementinterventionsforfrequentusersofhealthcareservicesascopingreview
AT chouinardmaudchristine effectivenessofcasemanagementinterventionsforfrequentusersofhealthcareservicesascopingreview
AT lambertmireille effectivenessofcasemanagementinterventionsforfrequentusersofhealthcareservicesascopingreview
AT dufourisabelle effectivenessofcasemanagementinterventionsforfrequentusersofhealthcareservicesascopingreview
AT kriegcynthia effectivenessofcasemanagementinterventionsforfrequentusersofhealthcareservicesascopingreview