Cargando…

Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation

AIMS: To determine the reproducibility of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) in the assessment of radial artery vasomotor function, and to examine the effect of transradial catheterisation on radial artery injury and recovery. METHODS: Radial artery FMD and NMD were exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, A J, Mills, N L, Newby, D E, Cruden, N L M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000443
_version_ 1782458089538060288
author Mitchell, A J
Mills, N L
Newby, D E
Cruden, N L M
author_facet Mitchell, A J
Mills, N L
Newby, D E
Cruden, N L M
author_sort Mitchell, A J
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine the reproducibility of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) in the assessment of radial artery vasomotor function, and to examine the effect of transradial catheterisation on radial artery injury and recovery. METHODS: Radial artery FMD and NMD were examined in 20 volunteers and 20 patients on four occasions (two visits at least 24 hours apart, with two assessments at each visit). In a further 10 patients, radial artery FMD was assessed in the catheterised arm prior to, at 24 hours and 3 months following cardiac catheterisation. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline radial artery diameter (2.7±0.4 mm vs 2.7±0.4 mm), FMD (13.4±6.4 vs 12.89±5.5%) or NMD (13.6±3.8% vs 10.1±4.3%) between healthy volunteers and patients (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Mean differences for within and between day FMD were 2.53% (95% CIs −15.5% to 20.5%) and −4.3% (−18.3% to 9.7%) in patients. Compared to baseline, radial artery FMD was impaired at 24 hours (8.7±4.1% vs 3.9±2.9%, p=0.015) but not 3 months (8.7±4.1% vs 6.2±4.4, p=0.34) following transradial catheterisation. CONCLUSIONS: Radial FMD is impaired early after transradial catheterisation but appears to recover by 3 months. While test–retest variability was demonstrated, our findings suggest that transradial access for cardiac catheterisation may afford a potential model of vascular injury and repair in vivo in man.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50514972016-10-17 Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation Mitchell, A J Mills, N L Newby, D E Cruden, N L M Open Heart Interventional Cardiology AIMS: To determine the reproducibility of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) in the assessment of radial artery vasomotor function, and to examine the effect of transradial catheterisation on radial artery injury and recovery. METHODS: Radial artery FMD and NMD were examined in 20 volunteers and 20 patients on four occasions (two visits at least 24 hours apart, with two assessments at each visit). In a further 10 patients, radial artery FMD was assessed in the catheterised arm prior to, at 24 hours and 3 months following cardiac catheterisation. RESULTS: There were no differences in baseline radial artery diameter (2.7±0.4 mm vs 2.7±0.4 mm), FMD (13.4±6.4 vs 12.89±5.5%) or NMD (13.6±3.8% vs 10.1±4.3%) between healthy volunteers and patients (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Mean differences for within and between day FMD were 2.53% (95% CIs −15.5% to 20.5%) and −4.3% (−18.3% to 9.7%) in patients. Compared to baseline, radial artery FMD was impaired at 24 hours (8.7±4.1% vs 3.9±2.9%, p=0.015) but not 3 months (8.7±4.1% vs 6.2±4.4, p=0.34) following transradial catheterisation. CONCLUSIONS: Radial FMD is impaired early after transradial catheterisation but appears to recover by 3 months. While test–retest variability was demonstrated, our findings suggest that transradial access for cardiac catheterisation may afford a potential model of vascular injury and repair in vivo in man. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5051497/ /pubmed/27752330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000443 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Mitchell, A J
Mills, N L
Newby, D E
Cruden, N L M
Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title_full Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title_fullStr Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title_full_unstemmed Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title_short Radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
title_sort radial artery vasomotor function following transradial cardiac catheterisation
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000443
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellaj radialarteryvasomotorfunctionfollowingtransradialcardiaccatheterisation
AT millsnl radialarteryvasomotorfunctionfollowingtransradialcardiaccatheterisation
AT newbyde radialarteryvasomotorfunctionfollowingtransradialcardiaccatheterisation
AT crudennlm radialarteryvasomotorfunctionfollowingtransradialcardiaccatheterisation