Cargando…
Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyse the short-term and long-term outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI) as compared to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to evaluate the optimal coronary revascularisation strategy. DESIGN: Retrospective anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000464 |
_version_ | 1782458091478974464 |
---|---|
author | Möckel, Martin Searle, Julia Baberg, Henning Thomas Dirschedl, Peter Levenson, Benny Malzahn, Jürgen Mansky, Thomas Günster, Christian Jeschke, Elke |
author_facet | Möckel, Martin Searle, Julia Baberg, Henning Thomas Dirschedl, Peter Levenson, Benny Malzahn, Jürgen Mansky, Thomas Günster, Christian Jeschke, Elke |
author_sort | Möckel, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyse the short-term and long-term outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI) as compared to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to evaluate the optimal coronary revascularisation strategy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routine statutory health insurance data between 2010 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was adjusted all-cause mortality after 30 days and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were repeat revascularisation at 30 days and 1 year and bleeding events within 7 days. RESULTS: The total number of cases was n=4123 (PCI; n=3417), median age was 71 (IQR 62–77), 30.4% were women. The adjusted OR for death within 30 days was 0.59 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.81) for patients undergoing PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was 1.58 (1.32 to 1.89) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.23 to 1.75) for all-cause death. In the subgroup of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), adjusted all-cause mortality at 30 days did not differ significantly between both groups (OR 0.75 (0.47 to 1.20)), whereas in patients without AMI the OR for 30-day mortality was 0.44 (0.28 to 0.68) for PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for MACCE in patients with AMI was 1.40 (1.06 to 1.85) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.08 to 1.99) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of unselected patients with ESRD undergoing revascularisation, the 1-year outcome was better for CABG in patients with and without AMI. The 30-day mortality was higher in non-AMI patients with CABG reflecting an early hazard with surgery. In cases where the patient's characteristics and risk profile make it difficult to decide on a revascularisation strategy, CABG could be the preferred option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5051505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50515052016-10-17 Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data Möckel, Martin Searle, Julia Baberg, Henning Thomas Dirschedl, Peter Levenson, Benny Malzahn, Jürgen Mansky, Thomas Günster, Christian Jeschke, Elke Open Heart Interventional Cardiology OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyse the short-term and long-term outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI) as compared to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to evaluate the optimal coronary revascularisation strategy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routine statutory health insurance data between 2010 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was adjusted all-cause mortality after 30 days and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were repeat revascularisation at 30 days and 1 year and bleeding events within 7 days. RESULTS: The total number of cases was n=4123 (PCI; n=3417), median age was 71 (IQR 62–77), 30.4% were women. The adjusted OR for death within 30 days was 0.59 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.81) for patients undergoing PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was 1.58 (1.32 to 1.89) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.23 to 1.75) for all-cause death. In the subgroup of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), adjusted all-cause mortality at 30 days did not differ significantly between both groups (OR 0.75 (0.47 to 1.20)), whereas in patients without AMI the OR for 30-day mortality was 0.44 (0.28 to 0.68) for PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for MACCE in patients with AMI was 1.40 (1.06 to 1.85) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.08 to 1.99) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of unselected patients with ESRD undergoing revascularisation, the 1-year outcome was better for CABG in patients with and without AMI. The 30-day mortality was higher in non-AMI patients with CABG reflecting an early hazard with surgery. In cases where the patient's characteristics and risk profile make it difficult to decide on a revascularisation strategy, CABG could be the preferred option. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5051505/ /pubmed/27752331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000464 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Möckel, Martin Searle, Julia Baberg, Henning Thomas Dirschedl, Peter Levenson, Benny Malzahn, Jürgen Mansky, Thomas Günster, Christian Jeschke, Elke Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title | Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title_full | Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title_fullStr | Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title_full_unstemmed | Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title_short | Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
title_sort | revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus pci—analysis of routine statutory health insurance data |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mockelmartin revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT searlejulia revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT baberghenningthomas revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT dirschedlpeter revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT levensonbenny revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT malzahnjurgen revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT manskythomas revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT gunsterchristian revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata AT jeschkeelke revascularisationofpatientswithendstagerenaldiseaseonchronichaemodialysisbypasssurgeryversuspcianalysisofroutinestatutoryhealthinsurancedata |