Cargando…

Data sharing through an NIH central database repository: a cross-sectional survey of BioLINCC users

OBJECTIVE: To characterise experiences using clinical research data shared through the National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC) clinical research data repository, along with data recipients’ perceptions of the value,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ross, Joseph S, Ritchie, Jessica D, Finn, Emily, Desai, Nihar R, Lehman, Richard L, Krumholz, Harlan M, Gross, Cary P
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27670522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012769

Ejemplares similares

Providing Contemporary Access to Historical Biospecimen Collections: Development of the NHLBI Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC)
por: Giffen, Carol A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Providing researchers with online access to NHLBI biospecimen collections: The results of the first six years of the NHLBI BioLINCC program
por: Giffen, Carol A., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute data: analyzing published articles that used BioLINCC open access data
por: AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years
por: Ross, Joseph S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

It depends whose data are being shared: considerations for genomic data sharing policies
por: Robinson, Jill O., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Effect of Postmortem Interval and Years in Storage on RNA Quality of Tissue at a Repository of the NIH NeuroBioBank
por: White, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year
por: Ellingson, Mallory K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Help-seeking behaviours, opportunistic treatment and psychological implications of adolescent acne: cross-sectional studies in schools and hospital outpatient departments in the UK
por: Desai, Karishma Parimal, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Availability of Clinical Trial Data From Industry‐Sponsored Cardiovascular Trials
por: Murugiah, Karthik, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Systematic review on the effects of the physical and social aspects of community pharmacy spaces on service users and staff
por: Dhital, R, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Service user perspectives on social prescribing services for mental health in the UK: a systematic review
por: Cooper, M, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations
por: Gewandter, Jennifer S, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey
por: Rathi, Vinay, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis
por: Ross, Joseph S, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project
por: Low, Jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey
por: Rathi, Vinay K, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Accessing Minnesota School District Administrators’ Knowledge and Perceptions Related to Sharing School Play Spaces After the Passage of Minnesota Shared Use Legislation
por: Spengler, John O., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Impact of Venous Thromboembolism on Risk of Death or Hemorrhage in Older Cancer Patients
por: Gross, Cary P., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
por: Gill, Christopher J
Publicado: (2012)

Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional study
por: Earley, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
por: Stretton, Serina
Publicado: (2014)

How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study
por: Kicinski, Michal
Publicado: (2014)

Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
por: Nagendran, Myura, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Quality of descriptions of treatments: a review of published randomised controlled trials
por: Schroter, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study
por: van den Bogert, Cornelis A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflict-of-interest disclosure at medical journals in Japan: a nationwide survey of the practices of journal secretariats
por: Kojima, Takako, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Gattrell, William T, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The impact of a streamlined funding application process on application time: two cross-sectional surveys of Australian researchers
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review
por: Lieb, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Standardised method for reporting exercise programmes: protocol for a modified Delphi study
por: Slade, Susan C, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis
por: Hays, Meredith, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_mbqs4moik0lbo696rvt82u44cv