Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria

Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model to explore the molecular exchanges that occur between an animal intestine and associated microbes. Previous studies in Drosophila uncovered a sophisticated web of host responses to intestinal bacteria. The outcomes of these responses define critical even...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petkau, Kristina, Fast, David, Duggal, Aashna, Foley, Edan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.017673
_version_ 1782458115886678016
author Petkau, Kristina
Fast, David
Duggal, Aashna
Foley, Edan
author_facet Petkau, Kristina
Fast, David
Duggal, Aashna
Foley, Edan
author_sort Petkau, Kristina
collection PubMed
description Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model to explore the molecular exchanges that occur between an animal intestine and associated microbes. Previous studies in Drosophila uncovered a sophisticated web of host responses to intestinal bacteria. The outcomes of these responses define critical events in the host, such as the establishment of immune responses, access to nutrients, and the rate of larval development. Despite our steady march towards illuminating the host machinery that responds to bacterial presence in the gut, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the microbial products that influence bacterial association with a fly host. We sequenced and characterized the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated microbes: Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis and Acetobacter pasteurianus. For each species, we compared the genomes of Drosophila-associated strains to the genomes of strains isolated from alternative sources. We found that environmental Lactobacillus strains readily associated with adult Drosophila and were similar to fly isolates in terms of genome organization. In contrast, we identified a strain of A. pasteurianus that apparently fails to associate with adult Drosophila due to an inability to grow on fly nutrient food. Comparisons between association competent and incompetent A. pasteurianus strains identified a short list of candidate genes that may contribute to survival on fly medium. Many of the gene products unique to fly-associated strains have established roles in the stabilization of host-microbe interactions. These data add to a growing body of literature that examines the microbial perspective of host-microbe relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5051641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50516412016-10-07 Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria Petkau, Kristina Fast, David Duggal, Aashna Foley, Edan Biol Open Research Article Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model to explore the molecular exchanges that occur between an animal intestine and associated microbes. Previous studies in Drosophila uncovered a sophisticated web of host responses to intestinal bacteria. The outcomes of these responses define critical events in the host, such as the establishment of immune responses, access to nutrients, and the rate of larval development. Despite our steady march towards illuminating the host machinery that responds to bacterial presence in the gut, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the microbial products that influence bacterial association with a fly host. We sequenced and characterized the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated microbes: Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis and Acetobacter pasteurianus. For each species, we compared the genomes of Drosophila-associated strains to the genomes of strains isolated from alternative sources. We found that environmental Lactobacillus strains readily associated with adult Drosophila and were similar to fly isolates in terms of genome organization. In contrast, we identified a strain of A. pasteurianus that apparently fails to associate with adult Drosophila due to an inability to grow on fly nutrient food. Comparisons between association competent and incompetent A. pasteurianus strains identified a short list of candidate genes that may contribute to survival on fly medium. Many of the gene products unique to fly-associated strains have established roles in the stabilization of host-microbe interactions. These data add to a growing body of literature that examines the microbial perspective of host-microbe relationships. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5051641/ /pubmed/27493201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.017673 Text en © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petkau, Kristina
Fast, David
Duggal, Aashna
Foley, Edan
Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title_full Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title_short Comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common Drosophila-associated bacteria
title_sort comparative evaluation of the genomes of three common drosophila-associated bacteria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.017673
work_keys_str_mv AT petkaukristina comparativeevaluationofthegenomesofthreecommondrosophilaassociatedbacteria
AT fastdavid comparativeevaluationofthegenomesofthreecommondrosophilaassociatedbacteria
AT duggalaashna comparativeevaluationofthegenomesofthreecommondrosophilaassociatedbacteria
AT foleyedan comparativeevaluationofthegenomesofthreecommondrosophilaassociatedbacteria