Cargando…
Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle
We herein study genetic recombination in three cattle populations from France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. We identify 2,395,177 crossover (CO) events in 94,516 male gametes, and 579,996 CO events in 25,332 female gametes. The average number of COs was found to be larger in males (23.3) than i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.204214.116 |
_version_ | 1782458181286363136 |
---|---|
author | Kadri, Naveen Kumar Harland, Chad Faux, Pierre Cambisano, Nadine Karim, Latifa Coppieters, Wouter Fritz, Sébastien Mullaart, Erik Baurain, Denis Boichard, Didier Spelman, Richard Charlier, Carole Georges, Michel Druet, Tom |
author_facet | Kadri, Naveen Kumar Harland, Chad Faux, Pierre Cambisano, Nadine Karim, Latifa Coppieters, Wouter Fritz, Sébastien Mullaart, Erik Baurain, Denis Boichard, Didier Spelman, Richard Charlier, Carole Georges, Michel Druet, Tom |
author_sort | Kadri, Naveen Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | We herein study genetic recombination in three cattle populations from France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. We identify 2,395,177 crossover (CO) events in 94,516 male gametes, and 579,996 CO events in 25,332 female gametes. The average number of COs was found to be larger in males (23.3) than in females (21.4). The heritability of global recombination rate (GRR) was estimated at 0.13 in males and 0.08 in females, with a genetic correlation of 0.66 indicating that shared variants are influencing GRR in both sexes. A genome-wide association study identified seven quantitative trait loci (QTL) for GRR. Fine-mapping following sequence-based imputation in 14,401 animals pinpointed likely causative coding (5) and noncoding (1) variants in genes known to be involved in meiotic recombination (HFM1, MSH4, RNF212, MLH3, MSH5) for 5/7 QTL, and noncoding variants (3) in RNF212B for 1/7 QTL. This suggests that this RNF212 paralog might also be involved in recombination. Most of the identified mutations had significant effects in both sexes, with three of them each accounting for ∼10% of the genetic variance in males. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50520532017-04-01 Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle Kadri, Naveen Kumar Harland, Chad Faux, Pierre Cambisano, Nadine Karim, Latifa Coppieters, Wouter Fritz, Sébastien Mullaart, Erik Baurain, Denis Boichard, Didier Spelman, Richard Charlier, Carole Georges, Michel Druet, Tom Genome Res Research We herein study genetic recombination in three cattle populations from France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. We identify 2,395,177 crossover (CO) events in 94,516 male gametes, and 579,996 CO events in 25,332 female gametes. The average number of COs was found to be larger in males (23.3) than in females (21.4). The heritability of global recombination rate (GRR) was estimated at 0.13 in males and 0.08 in females, with a genetic correlation of 0.66 indicating that shared variants are influencing GRR in both sexes. A genome-wide association study identified seven quantitative trait loci (QTL) for GRR. Fine-mapping following sequence-based imputation in 14,401 animals pinpointed likely causative coding (5) and noncoding (1) variants in genes known to be involved in meiotic recombination (HFM1, MSH4, RNF212, MLH3, MSH5) for 5/7 QTL, and noncoding variants (3) in RNF212B for 1/7 QTL. This suggests that this RNF212 paralog might also be involved in recombination. Most of the identified mutations had significant effects in both sexes, with three of them each accounting for ∼10% of the genetic variance in males. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5052053/ /pubmed/27516620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.204214.116 Text en © 2016 Kadri et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Kadri, Naveen Kumar Harland, Chad Faux, Pierre Cambisano, Nadine Karim, Latifa Coppieters, Wouter Fritz, Sébastien Mullaart, Erik Baurain, Denis Boichard, Didier Spelman, Richard Charlier, Carole Georges, Michel Druet, Tom Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title | Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title_full | Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title_fullStr | Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title_short | Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle |
title_sort | coding and noncoding variants in hfm1, mlh3, msh4, msh5, rnf212, and rnf212b affect recombination rate in cattle |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27516620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.204214.116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadrinaveenkumar codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT harlandchad codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT fauxpierre codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT cambisanonadine codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT karimlatifa codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT coppieterswouter codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT fritzsebastien codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT mullaarterik codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT bauraindenis codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT boicharddidier codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT spelmanrichard codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT charliercarole codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT georgesmichel codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle AT druettom codingandnoncodingvariantsinhfm1mlh3msh4msh5rnf212andrnf212baffectrecombinationrateincattle |