Cargando…
Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras
BACKGROUND: While fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and amyloid PET is valuable for patient management, research, and clinical trial of therapeutics on Alzheimer’s disease, the specific details of the PET scanning method including the PET camera model type influence the image quality, which may further affec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0159-y |
_version_ | 1782458197163900928 |
---|---|
author | Ikari, Yasuhiko Akamatsu, Go Nishio, Tomoyuki Ishii, Kenji Ito, Kengo Iwatsubo, Takeshi Senda, Michio |
author_facet | Ikari, Yasuhiko Akamatsu, Go Nishio, Tomoyuki Ishii, Kenji Ito, Kengo Iwatsubo, Takeshi Senda, Michio |
author_sort | Ikari, Yasuhiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and amyloid PET is valuable for patient management, research, and clinical trial of therapeutics on Alzheimer’s disease, the specific details of the PET scanning method including the PET camera model type influence the image quality, which may further affect the interpretation of images and quantitative capabilities. To make multicenter PET data reliable and to establish PET scanning as a universal diagnostic technique and a verified biomarker, we have proposed phantom test procedures and criteria for optimizing image quality across different PET cameras. RESULTS: As the method, four physical parameters (resolution, gray-white contrast, uniformity, and image noise) were selected as essential to image quality for brain FDG and amyloid PET and were measured with a Hoffman 3D brain phantom and a uniform cylindrical phantom on a total of 12 currently used PET models. The phantom radioactivity and acquisition time were determined based on the standard scanning protocol for each PET drug (FDG, (11)C-PiB, (18)F-florbetapir, and (18)F-flutemetamol). Reconstruction parameters were either determined based on the methods adopted in ADNI, J-ADNI, and other research and clinical trials or optimized based on measured phantom image parameters under various reconstruction conditions. As the result, phantom test criteria were proposed as follows: (i) 8 mm FWHM or better resolution and (ii) gray/white %contrast ≥55 % with the Hoffman 3D brain phantom and (iii) SD of 51 small region of interests (ROIs) ≤0.0249 (equivalent to 5 % variation) for uniformity and (iv) image noise (SD/mean) ≤15 % for a large ROI with the uniform cylindrical phantom. These criteria provided image quality conforming to those multicenter clinical studies and were also achievable with most of the PET cameras that are currently used. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed phantom test criteria facilitate standardization and qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET images and deserve further evaluation by future multicenter clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50522492016-10-24 Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras Ikari, Yasuhiko Akamatsu, Go Nishio, Tomoyuki Ishii, Kenji Ito, Kengo Iwatsubo, Takeshi Senda, Michio EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: While fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and amyloid PET is valuable for patient management, research, and clinical trial of therapeutics on Alzheimer’s disease, the specific details of the PET scanning method including the PET camera model type influence the image quality, which may further affect the interpretation of images and quantitative capabilities. To make multicenter PET data reliable and to establish PET scanning as a universal diagnostic technique and a verified biomarker, we have proposed phantom test procedures and criteria for optimizing image quality across different PET cameras. RESULTS: As the method, four physical parameters (resolution, gray-white contrast, uniformity, and image noise) were selected as essential to image quality for brain FDG and amyloid PET and were measured with a Hoffman 3D brain phantom and a uniform cylindrical phantom on a total of 12 currently used PET models. The phantom radioactivity and acquisition time were determined based on the standard scanning protocol for each PET drug (FDG, (11)C-PiB, (18)F-florbetapir, and (18)F-flutemetamol). Reconstruction parameters were either determined based on the methods adopted in ADNI, J-ADNI, and other research and clinical trials or optimized based on measured phantom image parameters under various reconstruction conditions. As the result, phantom test criteria were proposed as follows: (i) 8 mm FWHM or better resolution and (ii) gray/white %contrast ≥55 % with the Hoffman 3D brain phantom and (iii) SD of 51 small region of interests (ROIs) ≤0.0249 (equivalent to 5 % variation) for uniformity and (iv) image noise (SD/mean) ≤15 % for a large ROI with the uniform cylindrical phantom. These criteria provided image quality conforming to those multicenter clinical studies and were also achievable with most of the PET cameras that are currently used. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed phantom test criteria facilitate standardization and qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET images and deserve further evaluation by future multicenter clinical studies. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5052249/ /pubmed/27709546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0159-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ikari, Yasuhiko Akamatsu, Go Nishio, Tomoyuki Ishii, Kenji Ito, Kengo Iwatsubo, Takeshi Senda, Michio Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title | Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title_full | Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title_fullStr | Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title_full_unstemmed | Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title_short | Phantom criteria for qualification of brain FDG and amyloid PET across different cameras |
title_sort | phantom criteria for qualification of brain fdg and amyloid pet across different cameras |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27709546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0159-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikariyasuhiko phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT akamatsugo phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT nishiotomoyuki phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT ishiikenji phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT itokengo phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT iwatsubotakeshi phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras AT sendamichio phantomcriteriaforqualificationofbrainfdgandamyloidpetacrossdifferentcameras |