Cargando…

Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Individual responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are varied and therefore potentially limit its application. There is evidence that this variability is related to the contributions of Indirect waves (I-waves) recruited in the cortex. The latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuzum, Nathan D., Hendy, Ashlee M., Russell, Aaron P., Teo, Wei-Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487
_version_ 1782458201567920128
author Nuzum, Nathan D.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Russell, Aaron P.
Teo, Wei-Peng
author_facet Nuzum, Nathan D.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Russell, Aaron P.
Teo, Wei-Peng
author_sort Nuzum, Nathan D.
collection PubMed
description Individual responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are varied and therefore potentially limit its application. There is evidence that this variability is related to the contributions of Indirect waves (I-waves) recruited in the cortex. The latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be measured through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), allowing an individual’s responsiveness to tDCS to be determined. However, this single-pulse method requires several different orientations of the TMS coil, potentially affecting its reliability. Instead, we propose a paired-pulse TMS paradigm targeting I-waves as an alternative method. This method uses one orientation that reduces inter- and intra-trial variability. It was hypothesized that the paired-pulse method would correlate more highly to tDCS responses than the single-pulse method. In a randomized, double blinded, cross-over design, 30 healthy participants completed two sessions, receiving 20 min of either anodal (2 mA) or sham tDCS. TMS was used to quantify Short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at Inter stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms. Latency was determined in the posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) and latero-medial (LM) coil orientations. The relationship between latency, SICF measures and the change in suprathreshold MEP amplitude size following tDCS were determined with Pearson’s correlations. TMS measures, SICI and SICF were also used to determine responses to Anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS). Neither of the latency differences nor the SICF measures correlated to the change in MEP amplitude from pre-post tDCS (all P > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant response to tDCS in this cohort. This study highlights the need for testing the effects of various tDCS protocols on the different I-waves. Further research into SICF and whether it is a viable measure of I-wave facilitation is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50522682016-10-20 Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Nuzum, Nathan D. Hendy, Ashlee M. Russell, Aaron P. Teo, Wei-Peng Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Individual responses to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are varied and therefore potentially limit its application. There is evidence that this variability is related to the contributions of Indirect waves (I-waves) recruited in the cortex. The latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be measured through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), allowing an individual’s responsiveness to tDCS to be determined. However, this single-pulse method requires several different orientations of the TMS coil, potentially affecting its reliability. Instead, we propose a paired-pulse TMS paradigm targeting I-waves as an alternative method. This method uses one orientation that reduces inter- and intra-trial variability. It was hypothesized that the paired-pulse method would correlate more highly to tDCS responses than the single-pulse method. In a randomized, double blinded, cross-over design, 30 healthy participants completed two sessions, receiving 20 min of either anodal (2 mA) or sham tDCS. TMS was used to quantify Short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) at Inter stimulus intervals (ISIs) of 1.5, 3.5 and 4.5 ms. Latency was determined in the posterior-anterior (PA), anterior-posterior (AP) and latero-medial (LM) coil orientations. The relationship between latency, SICF measures and the change in suprathreshold MEP amplitude size following tDCS were determined with Pearson’s correlations. TMS measures, SICI and SICF were also used to determine responses to Anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS). Neither of the latency differences nor the SICF measures correlated to the change in MEP amplitude from pre-post tDCS (all P > 0.05). Overall, there was no significant response to tDCS in this cohort. This study highlights the need for testing the effects of various tDCS protocols on the different I-waves. Further research into SICF and whether it is a viable measure of I-wave facilitation is warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5052268/ /pubmed/27766075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487 Text en Copyright © 2016 Nuzum, Hendy, Russell and Teo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nuzum, Nathan D.
Hendy, Ashlee M.
Russell, Aaron P.
Teo, Wei-Peng
Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title_full Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title_fullStr Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title_short Measures to Predict The Individual Variability of Corticospinal Responses Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
title_sort measures to predict the individual variability of corticospinal responses following transcranial direct current stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27766075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00487
work_keys_str_mv AT nuzumnathand measurestopredicttheindividualvariabilityofcorticospinalresponsesfollowingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT hendyashleem measurestopredicttheindividualvariabilityofcorticospinalresponsesfollowingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT russellaaronp measurestopredicttheindividualvariabilityofcorticospinalresponsesfollowingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation
AT teoweipeng measurestopredicttheindividualvariabilityofcorticospinalresponsesfollowingtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulation