Cargando…

Single cell dynamic phenotyping

Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality withou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patsch, Katherin, Chiu, Chi-Li, Engeln, Mark, Agus, David B., Mallick, Parag, Mumenthaler, Shannon M., Ruderman, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785
_version_ 1782458247043612672
author Patsch, Katherin
Chiu, Chi-Li
Engeln, Mark
Agus, David B.
Mallick, Parag
Mumenthaler, Shannon M.
Ruderman, Daniel
author_facet Patsch, Katherin
Chiu, Chi-Li
Engeln, Mark
Agus, David B.
Mallick, Parag
Mumenthaler, Shannon M.
Ruderman, Daniel
author_sort Patsch, Katherin
collection PubMed
description Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality without sacrificing throughput. Here we present a 3-step workflow to improve dynamic phenotype measurements of heterogeneous cell populations. We provide guidelines for image acquisition, phenotype tracking, and data filtering to remove erroneous cell tracks using the novel Tracking Aberration Measure (TrAM). Our workflow is broadly applicable across imaging platforms and analysis software. By applying this workflow to cancer cell assays, we reduced aberrant cell track prevalence from 17% to 2%. The cost of this improvement was removing 15% of the well-tracked cells. This enabled detection of significant motility differences between cell lines. Similarly, we avoided detecting a false change in translocation kinetics by eliminating the true cause: varied proportions of unresponsive cells. Finally, by systematically seeking heterogeneous behaviors, we detected subpopulations that otherwise could have been missed, including early apoptotic events and pre-mitotic cells. We provide optimized protocols for specific applications and step-by-step guidelines for adapting them to a variety of biological systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50525352016-10-19 Single cell dynamic phenotyping Patsch, Katherin Chiu, Chi-Li Engeln, Mark Agus, David B. Mallick, Parag Mumenthaler, Shannon M. Ruderman, Daniel Sci Rep Article Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality without sacrificing throughput. Here we present a 3-step workflow to improve dynamic phenotype measurements of heterogeneous cell populations. We provide guidelines for image acquisition, phenotype tracking, and data filtering to remove erroneous cell tracks using the novel Tracking Aberration Measure (TrAM). Our workflow is broadly applicable across imaging platforms and analysis software. By applying this workflow to cancer cell assays, we reduced aberrant cell track prevalence from 17% to 2%. The cost of this improvement was removing 15% of the well-tracked cells. This enabled detection of significant motility differences between cell lines. Similarly, we avoided detecting a false change in translocation kinetics by eliminating the true cause: varied proportions of unresponsive cells. Finally, by systematically seeking heterogeneous behaviors, we detected subpopulations that otherwise could have been missed, including early apoptotic events and pre-mitotic cells. We provide optimized protocols for specific applications and step-by-step guidelines for adapting them to a variety of biological systems. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5052535/ /pubmed/27708391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Patsch, Katherin
Chiu, Chi-Li
Engeln, Mark
Agus, David B.
Mallick, Parag
Mumenthaler, Shannon M.
Ruderman, Daniel
Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title_full Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title_fullStr Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title_full_unstemmed Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title_short Single cell dynamic phenotyping
title_sort single cell dynamic phenotyping
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785
work_keys_str_mv AT patschkatherin singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT chiuchili singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT engelnmark singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT agusdavidb singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT mallickparag singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT mumenthalershannonm singlecelldynamicphenotyping
AT rudermandaniel singlecelldynamicphenotyping