Cargando…
Single cell dynamic phenotyping
Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality withou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785 |
_version_ | 1782458247043612672 |
---|---|
author | Patsch, Katherin Chiu, Chi-Li Engeln, Mark Agus, David B. Mallick, Parag Mumenthaler, Shannon M. Ruderman, Daniel |
author_facet | Patsch, Katherin Chiu, Chi-Li Engeln, Mark Agus, David B. Mallick, Parag Mumenthaler, Shannon M. Ruderman, Daniel |
author_sort | Patsch, Katherin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality without sacrificing throughput. Here we present a 3-step workflow to improve dynamic phenotype measurements of heterogeneous cell populations. We provide guidelines for image acquisition, phenotype tracking, and data filtering to remove erroneous cell tracks using the novel Tracking Aberration Measure (TrAM). Our workflow is broadly applicable across imaging platforms and analysis software. By applying this workflow to cancer cell assays, we reduced aberrant cell track prevalence from 17% to 2%. The cost of this improvement was removing 15% of the well-tracked cells. This enabled detection of significant motility differences between cell lines. Similarly, we avoided detecting a false change in translocation kinetics by eliminating the true cause: varied proportions of unresponsive cells. Finally, by systematically seeking heterogeneous behaviors, we detected subpopulations that otherwise could have been missed, including early apoptotic events and pre-mitotic cells. We provide optimized protocols for specific applications and step-by-step guidelines for adapting them to a variety of biological systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50525352016-10-19 Single cell dynamic phenotyping Patsch, Katherin Chiu, Chi-Li Engeln, Mark Agus, David B. Mallick, Parag Mumenthaler, Shannon M. Ruderman, Daniel Sci Rep Article Live cell imaging has improved our ability to measure phenotypic heterogeneity. However, bottlenecks in imaging and image processing often make it difficult to differentiate interesting biological behavior from technical artifact. Thus there is a need for new methods that improve data quality without sacrificing throughput. Here we present a 3-step workflow to improve dynamic phenotype measurements of heterogeneous cell populations. We provide guidelines for image acquisition, phenotype tracking, and data filtering to remove erroneous cell tracks using the novel Tracking Aberration Measure (TrAM). Our workflow is broadly applicable across imaging platforms and analysis software. By applying this workflow to cancer cell assays, we reduced aberrant cell track prevalence from 17% to 2%. The cost of this improvement was removing 15% of the well-tracked cells. This enabled detection of significant motility differences between cell lines. Similarly, we avoided detecting a false change in translocation kinetics by eliminating the true cause: varied proportions of unresponsive cells. Finally, by systematically seeking heterogeneous behaviors, we detected subpopulations that otherwise could have been missed, including early apoptotic events and pre-mitotic cells. We provide optimized protocols for specific applications and step-by-step guidelines for adapting them to a variety of biological systems. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5052535/ /pubmed/27708391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Patsch, Katherin Chiu, Chi-Li Engeln, Mark Agus, David B. Mallick, Parag Mumenthaler, Shannon M. Ruderman, Daniel Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title | Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title_full | Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title_fullStr | Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title_short | Single cell dynamic phenotyping |
title_sort | single cell dynamic phenotyping |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patschkatherin singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT chiuchili singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT engelnmark singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT agusdavidb singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT mallickparag singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT mumenthalershannonm singlecelldynamicphenotyping AT rudermandaniel singlecelldynamicphenotyping |