Cargando…
Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies
[Image: see text] Indoor dust is a reservoir for commercial consumer product chemicals, including many compounds with known or suspected health effects. However, most dust exposure studies measure few chemicals in small samples. We systematically searched the U.S. indoor dust literature on phthalate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27623734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02023 |
_version_ | 1782458270648107008 |
---|---|
author | Mitro, Susanna D. Dodson, Robin E. Singla, Veena Adamkiewicz, Gary Elmi, Angelo F. Tilly, Monica K. Zota, Ami R. |
author_facet | Mitro, Susanna D. Dodson, Robin E. Singla, Veena Adamkiewicz, Gary Elmi, Angelo F. Tilly, Monica K. Zota, Ami R. |
author_sort | Mitro, Susanna D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Indoor dust is a reservoir for commercial consumer product chemicals, including many compounds with known or suspected health effects. However, most dust exposure studies measure few chemicals in small samples. We systematically searched the U.S. indoor dust literature on phthalates, replacement flame retardants (RFRs), perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), synthetic fragrances, and environmental phenols and estimated pooled geometric means (GMs) and 95% confidence intervals for 45 chemicals measured in ≥3 data sets. In order to rank and contextualize these results, we used the pooled GMs to calculate residential intake from dust ingestion, inhalation, and dermal uptake from air, and then identified hazard traits from the Safer Consumer Products Candidate Chemical List. Our results indicate that U.S. indoor dust consistently contains chemicals from multiple classes. Phthalates occurred in the highest concentrations, followed by phenols, RFRs, fragrance, and PFASs. Several phthalates and RFRs had the highest residential intakes. We also found that many chemicals in dust share hazard traits such as reproductive and endocrine toxicity. We offer recommendations to maximize comparability of studies and advance indoor exposure science. This information is critical in shaping future exposure and health studies, especially related to cumulative exposures, and in providing evidence for intervention development and public policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50526602016-10-10 Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies Mitro, Susanna D. Dodson, Robin E. Singla, Veena Adamkiewicz, Gary Elmi, Angelo F. Tilly, Monica K. Zota, Ami R. Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] Indoor dust is a reservoir for commercial consumer product chemicals, including many compounds with known or suspected health effects. However, most dust exposure studies measure few chemicals in small samples. We systematically searched the U.S. indoor dust literature on phthalates, replacement flame retardants (RFRs), perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), synthetic fragrances, and environmental phenols and estimated pooled geometric means (GMs) and 95% confidence intervals for 45 chemicals measured in ≥3 data sets. In order to rank and contextualize these results, we used the pooled GMs to calculate residential intake from dust ingestion, inhalation, and dermal uptake from air, and then identified hazard traits from the Safer Consumer Products Candidate Chemical List. Our results indicate that U.S. indoor dust consistently contains chemicals from multiple classes. Phthalates occurred in the highest concentrations, followed by phenols, RFRs, fragrance, and PFASs. Several phthalates and RFRs had the highest residential intakes. We also found that many chemicals in dust share hazard traits such as reproductive and endocrine toxicity. We offer recommendations to maximize comparability of studies and advance indoor exposure science. This information is critical in shaping future exposure and health studies, especially related to cumulative exposures, and in providing evidence for intervention development and public policy. American Chemical Society 2016-09-14 2016-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5052660/ /pubmed/27623734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02023 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Mitro, Susanna D. Dodson, Robin E. Singla, Veena Adamkiewicz, Gary Elmi, Angelo F. Tilly, Monica K. Zota, Ami R. Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title | Consumer
Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative
Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title_full | Consumer
Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative
Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title_fullStr | Consumer
Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative
Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumer
Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative
Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title_short | Consumer
Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative
Meta-analysis of U.S. Studies |
title_sort | consumer
product chemicals in indoor dust: a quantitative
meta-analysis of u.s. studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27623734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitrosusannad consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT dodsonrobine consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT singlaveena consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT adamkiewiczgary consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT elmiangelof consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT tillymonicak consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies AT zotaamir consumerproductchemicalsinindoordustaquantitativemetaanalysisofusstudies |