Cargando…

The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Gemma M, Armstrong, Sarah, Gordon, Adam L, Gladman, John, Robertson, Kate, Ward, Marie, Conroy, Simon, Arnold, Gail, Darby, Janet, Frowd, Nadia, Williams, Wynne, Knowles, Sue, Logan, Pip A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672
_version_ 1782458276551589888
author Walker, Gemma M
Armstrong, Sarah
Gordon, Adam L
Gladman, John
Robertson, Kate
Ward, Marie
Conroy, Simon
Arnold, Gail
Darby, Janet
Frowd, Nadia
Williams, Wynne
Knowles, Sue
Logan, Pip A
author_facet Walker, Gemma M
Armstrong, Sarah
Gordon, Adam L
Gladman, John
Robertson, Kate
Ward, Marie
Conroy, Simon
Arnold, Gail
Darby, Janet
Frowd, Nadia
Williams, Wynne
Knowles, Sue
Logan, Pip A
author_sort Walker, Gemma M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK. SUBJECTS: Residents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care. OUTCOMES: Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact. RESULTS: A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50526952016-10-12 The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes Walker, Gemma M Armstrong, Sarah Gordon, Adam L Gladman, John Robertson, Kate Ward, Marie Conroy, Simon Arnold, Gail Darby, Janet Frowd, Nadia Williams, Wynne Knowles, Sue Logan, Pip A Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK. SUBJECTS: Residents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care. OUTCOMES: Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact. RESULTS: A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records. SAGE Publications 2015-09-18 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5052695/ /pubmed/26385358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Evaluative Studies
Walker, Gemma M
Armstrong, Sarah
Gordon, Adam L
Gladman, John
Robertson, Kate
Ward, Marie
Conroy, Simon
Arnold, Gail
Darby, Janet
Frowd, Nadia
Williams, Wynne
Knowles, Sue
Logan, Pip A
The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title_full The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title_fullStr The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title_full_unstemmed The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title_short The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
title_sort falls in care home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
topic Evaluative Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672
work_keys_str_mv AT walkergemmam thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT armstrongsarah thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT gordonadaml thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT gladmanjohn thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT robertsonkate thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT wardmarie thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT conroysimon thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT arnoldgail thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT darbyjanet thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT frowdnadia thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT williamswynne thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT knowlessue thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT loganpipa thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT walkergemmam fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT armstrongsarah fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT gordonadaml fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT gladmanjohn fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT robertsonkate fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT wardmarie fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT conroysimon fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT arnoldgail fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT darbyjanet fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT frowdnadia fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT williamswynne fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT knowlessue fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes
AT loganpipa fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes