Cargando…
The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672 |
_version_ | 1782458276551589888 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Gemma M Armstrong, Sarah Gordon, Adam L Gladman, John Robertson, Kate Ward, Marie Conroy, Simon Arnold, Gail Darby, Janet Frowd, Nadia Williams, Wynne Knowles, Sue Logan, Pip A |
author_facet | Walker, Gemma M Armstrong, Sarah Gordon, Adam L Gladman, John Robertson, Kate Ward, Marie Conroy, Simon Arnold, Gail Darby, Janet Frowd, Nadia Williams, Wynne Knowles, Sue Logan, Pip A |
author_sort | Walker, Gemma M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK. SUBJECTS: Residents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care. OUTCOMES: Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact. RESULTS: A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50526952016-10-12 The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes Walker, Gemma M Armstrong, Sarah Gordon, Adam L Gladman, John Robertson, Kate Ward, Marie Conroy, Simon Arnold, Gail Darby, Janet Frowd, Nadia Williams, Wynne Knowles, Sue Logan, Pip A Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention. DESIGN: Two-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. SETTING: Purposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK. SUBJECTS: Residents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill. INTERVENTIONS: Intervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care. OUTCOMES: Recruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact. RESULTS: A total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records. SAGE Publications 2015-09-18 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5052695/ /pubmed/26385358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Evaluative Studies Walker, Gemma M Armstrong, Sarah Gordon, Adam L Gladman, John Robertson, Kate Ward, Marie Conroy, Simon Arnold, Gail Darby, Janet Frowd, Nadia Williams, Wynne Knowles, Sue Logan, Pip A The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title | The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title_full | The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title_fullStr | The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title_short | The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
title_sort | falls in care home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes |
topic | Evaluative Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215515604672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkergemmam thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT armstrongsarah thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT gordonadaml thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT gladmanjohn thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT robertsonkate thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT wardmarie thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT conroysimon thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT arnoldgail thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT darbyjanet thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT frowdnadia thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT williamswynne thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT knowlessue thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT loganpipa thefallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT walkergemmam fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT armstrongsarah fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT gordonadaml fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT gladmanjohn fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT robertsonkate fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT wardmarie fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT conroysimon fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT arnoldgail fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT darbyjanet fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT frowdnadia fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT williamswynne fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT knowlessue fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes AT loganpipa fallsincarehomestudyafeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheuseofariskassessmentanddecisionsupporttooltopreventfallsincarehomes |