Cargando…
For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently
BACKGROUND: Health-promoting interventions tailored to support older persons to remain in their homes, so-called “ageing in place” is important for supporting or improving their health. The health-promoting programme “Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone,” (EPRZ) was set up for this purpose and has show...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8 |
_version_ | 1782458281607823360 |
---|---|
author | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Eklund, Kajsa Wilhelmson, Katarina Behm, Lina Häggblom-Kronlöf, Greta Zidén, Lena Landahl, Sten Gustafsson, Susanne |
author_facet | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Eklund, Kajsa Wilhelmson, Katarina Behm, Lina Häggblom-Kronlöf, Greta Zidén, Lena Landahl, Sten Gustafsson, Susanne |
author_sort | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health-promoting interventions tailored to support older persons to remain in their homes, so-called “ageing in place” is important for supporting or improving their health. The health-promoting programme “Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone,” (EPRZ) was set up for this purpose and has shown positive results for maintaining independence in activities of daily living for older persons 80 years and above at 1- and 2 year follow-ups. The aim of this study was to explore factors for maintaining independence in the EPRZ health-promoting programme. METHODS: Total of 459 participants in the original trial was included in the analysis; 345 in the programme arm and 114 in the control arm. Thirteen variables, including demographic, health, and programme-specific indicators, were chosen as predictors for independence of activities of daily living. Logistic regression was performed separately for participants in the health promotion programme and in the control arm. RESULTS: In the programme arm, being younger, living alone and self-rated lack of tiredness in performing mobility activities predicted a positive effect of independence in activities of daily living at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 1.73, 3.02) and 2-year, (OR 1.13, 2.01, 2.02). In the control arm, being less frail was the only predictor at 1-year follow up (OR 1.6 1.09, 2.4); no variables predicted the outcome at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons living alone — as a risk of ill health — should be especially recognized and offered an opportunity to participate in health-promoting programmes such as “Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone”. Further, screening for subjective frailty could form an advantageous guiding principle to target the right population when deciding to whom health-promoting intervention should be offered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00877058, April 6, 2009. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50527182016-10-06 For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Eklund, Kajsa Wilhelmson, Katarina Behm, Lina Häggblom-Kronlöf, Greta Zidén, Lena Landahl, Sten Gustafsson, Susanne BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Health-promoting interventions tailored to support older persons to remain in their homes, so-called “ageing in place” is important for supporting or improving their health. The health-promoting programme “Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone,” (EPRZ) was set up for this purpose and has shown positive results for maintaining independence in activities of daily living for older persons 80 years and above at 1- and 2 year follow-ups. The aim of this study was to explore factors for maintaining independence in the EPRZ health-promoting programme. METHODS: Total of 459 participants in the original trial was included in the analysis; 345 in the programme arm and 114 in the control arm. Thirteen variables, including demographic, health, and programme-specific indicators, were chosen as predictors for independence of activities of daily living. Logistic regression was performed separately for participants in the health promotion programme and in the control arm. RESULTS: In the programme arm, being younger, living alone and self-rated lack of tiredness in performing mobility activities predicted a positive effect of independence in activities of daily living at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 1.73, 3.02) and 2-year, (OR 1.13, 2.01, 2.02). In the control arm, being less frail was the only predictor at 1-year follow up (OR 1.6 1.09, 2.4); no variables predicted the outcome at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons living alone — as a risk of ill health — should be especially recognized and offered an opportunity to participate in health-promoting programmes such as “Elderly Persons in the Risk Zone”. Further, screening for subjective frailty could form an advantageous guiding principle to target the right population when deciding to whom health-promoting intervention should be offered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00877058, April 6, 2009. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5052718/ /pubmed/27716095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Eklund, Kajsa Wilhelmson, Katarina Behm, Lina Häggblom-Kronlöf, Greta Zidén, Lena Landahl, Sten Gustafsson, Susanne For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title | For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title_full | For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title_fullStr | For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title_full_unstemmed | For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title_short | For whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? Predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
title_sort | for whom is a health-promoting intervention effective? predictive factors for performing activities of daily living independently |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0345-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahlinivanoffsynneve forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT eklundkajsa forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT wilhelmsonkatarina forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT behmlina forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT haggblomkronlofgreta forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT zidenlena forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT landahlsten forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently AT gustafssonsusanne forwhomisahealthpromotinginterventioneffectivepredictivefactorsforperformingactivitiesofdailylivingindependently |