Cargando…

Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department

Resuscitation with intravenous fluid can restore intravascular volume and improve stroke volume. However, in unstable patients, approximately 50% of fluid boluses fail to improve cardiac output as intended. Increasing evidence suggests that excess fluid may worsen patient outcomes. Clinical examinat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackenzie, David C., Noble, Vicki E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752556
http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.040
_version_ 1782458295225679872
author Mackenzie, David C.
Noble, Vicki E.
author_facet Mackenzie, David C.
Noble, Vicki E.
author_sort Mackenzie, David C.
collection PubMed
description Resuscitation with intravenous fluid can restore intravascular volume and improve stroke volume. However, in unstable patients, approximately 50% of fluid boluses fail to improve cardiac output as intended. Increasing evidence suggests that excess fluid may worsen patient outcomes. Clinical examination and vital signs are unreliable predictors of the response to a fluid challenge. We review the importance of fluid management in the critically ill, methods of evaluating volume status, and tools to predict fluid responsiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50528292016-10-17 Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department Mackenzie, David C. Noble, Vicki E. Clin Exp Emerg Med Review Article Resuscitation with intravenous fluid can restore intravascular volume and improve stroke volume. However, in unstable patients, approximately 50% of fluid boluses fail to improve cardiac output as intended. Increasing evidence suggests that excess fluid may worsen patient outcomes. Clinical examination and vital signs are unreliable predictors of the response to a fluid challenge. We review the importance of fluid management in the critically ill, methods of evaluating volume status, and tools to predict fluid responsiveness. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2014-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5052829/ /pubmed/27752556 http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.040 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Mackenzie, David C.
Noble, Vicki E.
Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_full Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_fullStr Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_short Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
title_sort assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752556
http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.040
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenziedavidc assessingvolumestatusandfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment
AT noblevickie assessingvolumestatusandfluidresponsivenessintheemergencydepartment