Cargando…

A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Young Hwan, Lee, Jong Ho, Shin, Jae Jun, Cho, Young Soon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752605
http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076
_version_ 1782458310006407168
author Choi, Young Hwan
Lee, Jong Ho
Shin, Jae Jun
Cho, Young Soon
author_facet Choi, Young Hwan
Lee, Jong Ho
Shin, Jae Jun
Cho, Young Soon
author_sort Choi, Young Hwan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients who were admitted to two burn centers. We collected information about the general characteristics of patients, burn area size, abbreviated burn severity index, whether surgery was performed, endoscopy results, and the total body surface area (TBSA). We performed a multivariate regression analysis predicting development of Curling’s ulcer. RESULTS: In total, 135 patients (mean age, 49.5±13.5 years) underwent endoscopy. Endoscopy revealed ulcer in 51 patients: 36 (70.6%) with gastric ulcers, 9 (17.6%) with duodenal ulcers, and 6 (11.8%) with both ulcer types. Burn area, burn depth, epigastric pain, melena, intensive care unit admission, burn area >20% of TBSA, and undergoing surgery for the burn were significantly different between the ulcer and non-ulcer groups. Multivariate analysis showed two independent factors significantly associated with ulcer: epigastric pain (odds ratio [OR]: 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74 to 11.90), major burn (TBSA > 20%)(OR: 4.31 ,95% CI: 1.34 to 13.85). CONCLUSION: For burn patients, presence of epigastric pain and major burn with TBSA > 20% showed significant association with ulcer development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50529122016-10-17 A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Jong Ho Shin, Jae Jun Cho, Young Soon Clin Exp Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients who were admitted to two burn centers. We collected information about the general characteristics of patients, burn area size, abbreviated burn severity index, whether surgery was performed, endoscopy results, and the total body surface area (TBSA). We performed a multivariate regression analysis predicting development of Curling’s ulcer. RESULTS: In total, 135 patients (mean age, 49.5±13.5 years) underwent endoscopy. Endoscopy revealed ulcer in 51 patients: 36 (70.6%) with gastric ulcers, 9 (17.6%) with duodenal ulcers, and 6 (11.8%) with both ulcer types. Burn area, burn depth, epigastric pain, melena, intensive care unit admission, burn area >20% of TBSA, and undergoing surgery for the burn were significantly different between the ulcer and non-ulcer groups. Multivariate analysis showed two independent factors significantly associated with ulcer: epigastric pain (odds ratio [OR]: 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74 to 11.90), major burn (TBSA > 20%)(OR: 4.31 ,95% CI: 1.34 to 13.85). CONCLUSION: For burn patients, presence of epigastric pain and major burn with TBSA > 20% showed significant association with ulcer development. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5052912/ /pubmed/27752605 http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Young Hwan
Lee, Jong Ho
Shin, Jae Jun
Cho, Young Soon
A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title_full A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title_fullStr A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title_full_unstemmed A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title_short A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
title_sort revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752605
http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyounghwan arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT leejongho arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT shinjaejun arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT choyoungsoon arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT choiyounghwan revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT leejongho revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT shinjaejun revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis
AT choyoungsoon revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis