Cargando…
A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis
OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752605 http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076 |
_version_ | 1782458310006407168 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Jong Ho Shin, Jae Jun Cho, Young Soon |
author_facet | Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Jong Ho Shin, Jae Jun Cho, Young Soon |
author_sort | Choi, Young Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients who were admitted to two burn centers. We collected information about the general characteristics of patients, burn area size, abbreviated burn severity index, whether surgery was performed, endoscopy results, and the total body surface area (TBSA). We performed a multivariate regression analysis predicting development of Curling’s ulcer. RESULTS: In total, 135 patients (mean age, 49.5±13.5 years) underwent endoscopy. Endoscopy revealed ulcer in 51 patients: 36 (70.6%) with gastric ulcers, 9 (17.6%) with duodenal ulcers, and 6 (11.8%) with both ulcer types. Burn area, burn depth, epigastric pain, melena, intensive care unit admission, burn area >20% of TBSA, and undergoing surgery for the burn were significantly different between the ulcer and non-ulcer groups. Multivariate analysis showed two independent factors significantly associated with ulcer: epigastric pain (odds ratio [OR]: 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74 to 11.90), major burn (TBSA > 20%)(OR: 4.31 ,95% CI: 1.34 to 13.85). CONCLUSION: For burn patients, presence of epigastric pain and major burn with TBSA > 20% showed significant association with ulcer development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50529122016-10-17 A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Jong Ho Shin, Jae Jun Cho, Young Soon Clin Exp Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Most of the literature about Curling’s ulcer was published from 1960 through 1980. Therefore, an updated study of Curling’s ulcer is needed. We analyzed the risk factors affecting ulcer incidence in burn patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of burn patients who were admitted to two burn centers. We collected information about the general characteristics of patients, burn area size, abbreviated burn severity index, whether surgery was performed, endoscopy results, and the total body surface area (TBSA). We performed a multivariate regression analysis predicting development of Curling’s ulcer. RESULTS: In total, 135 patients (mean age, 49.5±13.5 years) underwent endoscopy. Endoscopy revealed ulcer in 51 patients: 36 (70.6%) with gastric ulcers, 9 (17.6%) with duodenal ulcers, and 6 (11.8%) with both ulcer types. Burn area, burn depth, epigastric pain, melena, intensive care unit admission, burn area >20% of TBSA, and undergoing surgery for the burn were significantly different between the ulcer and non-ulcer groups. Multivariate analysis showed two independent factors significantly associated with ulcer: epigastric pain (odds ratio [OR]: 4.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74 to 11.90), major burn (TBSA > 20%)(OR: 4.31 ,95% CI: 1.34 to 13.85). CONCLUSION: For burn patients, presence of epigastric pain and major burn with TBSA > 20% showed significant association with ulcer development. The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2015-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5052912/ /pubmed/27752605 http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Young Hwan Lee, Jong Ho Shin, Jae Jun Cho, Young Soon A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title | A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title_full | A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title_fullStr | A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title_short | A revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
title_sort | revised risk analysis of stress ulcers in burn patients receiving ulcer prophylaxis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752605 http://dx.doi.org/10.15441/ceem.15.076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiyounghwan arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT leejongho arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT shinjaejun arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT choyoungsoon arevisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT choiyounghwan revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT leejongho revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT shinjaejun revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis AT choyoungsoon revisedriskanalysisofstressulcersinburnpatientsreceivingulcerprophylaxis |