Cargando…

One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects

INTRODUCTION: Primary microvascular reconstruction of multiple defects is challenging particularly if it has to be simultaneous. In trauma cases, harvesting two independent free flaps from different sites is very time-consuming and adds to morbidity. To eliminate these disadvantages, we sought to fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bandi, Susmitha, Koteswara Rao, Rayidi Venkata, Reddy, Damalacheruvu Mukunda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191325
_version_ 1782458328187666432
author Bandi, Susmitha
Koteswara Rao, Rayidi Venkata
Reddy, Damalacheruvu Mukunda
author_facet Bandi, Susmitha
Koteswara Rao, Rayidi Venkata
Reddy, Damalacheruvu Mukunda
author_sort Bandi, Susmitha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Primary microvascular reconstruction of multiple defects is challenging particularly if it has to be simultaneous. In trauma cases, harvesting two independent free flaps from different sites is very time-consuming and adds to morbidity. To eliminate these disadvantages, we sought to find out a reliable alternative method of harvesting two independent free flaps based on the descending branch of circumflex femoral artery, i.e., one anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and one rectus femoris muscle flap. AIM: To study the feasibility of transferring two free flaps, i.e., ALT and rectus femoris muscle flap simultaneously from the same thigh for coverage of two different limb defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2012, five patients with two defects each were managed with a total of ten flaps harvested from five donor sites based on independent pedicles of descending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery and used to cover severe injuries of extremities. Three cases had both lower limb defects and two cases had one upper limb and one lower limb defect. In each case, one ALT flap and one rectus femoris muscle flap were used for coverage. RESULTS: All reconstructive procedures were completed without any major complications. All flaps survived well. There were no re-explorations and no complications related to donor sites. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our approach of simultaneous harvest of ALT and rectus femoris muscle from the same thigh offers two flaps for two different defects in terms of economy of donor site and operating time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5052991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50529912016-11-10 One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects Bandi, Susmitha Koteswara Rao, Rayidi Venkata Reddy, Damalacheruvu Mukunda Indian J Plast Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Primary microvascular reconstruction of multiple defects is challenging particularly if it has to be simultaneous. In trauma cases, harvesting two independent free flaps from different sites is very time-consuming and adds to morbidity. To eliminate these disadvantages, we sought to find out a reliable alternative method of harvesting two independent free flaps based on the descending branch of circumflex femoral artery, i.e., one anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and one rectus femoris muscle flap. AIM: To study the feasibility of transferring two free flaps, i.e., ALT and rectus femoris muscle flap simultaneously from the same thigh for coverage of two different limb defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2012, five patients with two defects each were managed with a total of ten flaps harvested from five donor sites based on independent pedicles of descending branch of lateral circumflex femoral artery and used to cover severe injuries of extremities. Three cases had both lower limb defects and two cases had one upper limb and one lower limb defect. In each case, one ALT flap and one rectus femoris muscle flap were used for coverage. RESULTS: All reconstructive procedures were completed without any major complications. All flaps survived well. There were no re-explorations and no complications related to donor sites. CONCLUSION: We conclude that our approach of simultaneous harvest of ALT and rectus femoris muscle from the same thigh offers two flaps for two different defects in terms of economy of donor site and operating time. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5052991/ /pubmed/27833281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191325 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bandi, Susmitha
Koteswara Rao, Rayidi Venkata
Reddy, Damalacheruvu Mukunda
One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title_full One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title_fullStr One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title_full_unstemmed One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title_short One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
title_sort one plus one: two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833281
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191325
work_keys_str_mv AT bandisusmitha oneplusonetwofreeflapsfromsamedonorthighforsimultaneouscoverageoftwodifferentdefects
AT koteswararaorayidivenkata oneplusonetwofreeflapsfromsamedonorthighforsimultaneouscoverageoftwodifferentdefects
AT reddydamalacheruvumukunda oneplusonetwofreeflapsfromsamedonorthighforsimultaneouscoverageoftwodifferentdefects