Cargando…
Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, pre-operative breast markings are usually made using an indelible marker. These markings are at risk of being removed by pre-operative cleaning, positional changes and parenchymal changes post-incision. We present our approach to breast surgery with rib or intercostal mark...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191294 |
_version_ | 1782458329563398144 |
---|---|
author | Joethy, Janna Tan, Bien-Keem |
author_facet | Joethy, Janna Tan, Bien-Keem |
author_sort | Joethy, Janna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditionally, pre-operative breast markings are usually made using an indelible marker. These markings are at risk of being removed by pre-operative cleaning, positional changes and parenchymal changes post-incision. We present our approach to breast surgery with rib or intercostal markings using methylene blue. METHODS: Using an indelible marker, markings are made on the breast and the inframammary crease. A blue needle (23 G) mounted on a 1 ml syringe is prepared, and aliquots of 0.1 ml of methylene blue are injected. Excessive infiltration and pre-operative local anaesthetic infiltration result in diffusion of the dye and difficulty with accuracy. Dye is injected directly over the bony periosteum closest to the inframammary fold. RESULTS: We achieved good symmetry of bilateral breast implants. Photographs were taken pre-operative and 3 months post-operative and were evaluated independently by medical officers. All results were rated as good or very good. We had 39 patients and follow-up was between 3 and 24 months. There were no implant-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: For accurate implant placement, a fixed position must be found. Our technique utilises the relative immobility of the ribs for accurate implant placement. Disadvantages to our method were few, and we had two cases of dizziness or patients feeling faint due to pain. There is also a potential allergic or anaphylaxis reaction, but we did not experience any allergic reaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5052997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50529972016-11-10 Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings Joethy, Janna Tan, Bien-Keem Indian J Plast Surg Ideas and Innovations BACKGROUND: Traditionally, pre-operative breast markings are usually made using an indelible marker. These markings are at risk of being removed by pre-operative cleaning, positional changes and parenchymal changes post-incision. We present our approach to breast surgery with rib or intercostal markings using methylene blue. METHODS: Using an indelible marker, markings are made on the breast and the inframammary crease. A blue needle (23 G) mounted on a 1 ml syringe is prepared, and aliquots of 0.1 ml of methylene blue are injected. Excessive infiltration and pre-operative local anaesthetic infiltration result in diffusion of the dye and difficulty with accuracy. Dye is injected directly over the bony periosteum closest to the inframammary fold. RESULTS: We achieved good symmetry of bilateral breast implants. Photographs were taken pre-operative and 3 months post-operative and were evaluated independently by medical officers. All results were rated as good or very good. We had 39 patients and follow-up was between 3 and 24 months. There were no implant-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: For accurate implant placement, a fixed position must be found. Our technique utilises the relative immobility of the ribs for accurate implant placement. Disadvantages to our method were few, and we had two cases of dizziness or patients feeling faint due to pain. There is also a potential allergic or anaphylaxis reaction, but we did not experience any allergic reaction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5052997/ /pubmed/27833287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191294 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Ideas and Innovations Joethy, Janna Tan, Bien-Keem Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title | Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title_full | Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title_fullStr | Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title_full_unstemmed | Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title_short | Precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
title_sort | precise breast implant placement using percutaneous chest wall markings |
topic | Ideas and Innovations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5052997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.191294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joethyjanna precisebreastimplantplacementusingpercutaneouschestwallmarkings AT tanbienkeem precisebreastimplantplacementusingpercutaneouschestwallmarkings |