Cargando…
Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action
BACKGROUND: As patient satisfaction scores become increasingly relevant in today’s health care market, we sought to evaluate satisfaction of the unique subset of patients enrolling in clinical trials in a research facility embedded within a community hospital system. METHODS: We developed and deploy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6 |
_version_ | 1782458370711617536 |
---|---|
author | Pflugeisen, Bethann Mangel Rebar, Stacie Reedy, Anne Pierce, Roslyn Amoroso, Paul J. |
author_facet | Pflugeisen, Bethann Mangel Rebar, Stacie Reedy, Anne Pierce, Roslyn Amoroso, Paul J. |
author_sort | Pflugeisen, Bethann Mangel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As patient satisfaction scores become increasingly relevant in today’s health care market, we sought to evaluate satisfaction of the unique subset of patients enrolling in clinical trials in a research facility embedded within a community hospital system. METHODS: We developed and deployed a patient satisfaction survey tailored to clinical trial patients who consented to and/or completed a clinical trial in our research institute in the prior year. The survey was distributed to 222 patients. Likert scale responses were analyzed using top box and percentile rank procedures. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations between the clinical trial experience and intent to return to our system for routine care. RESULTS: Ninety surveys were returned in the 6 months following the mailing for a 41 % response rate; the bulk of these (N = 81) were returned within 6 weeks of the mailing. The questions with the highest ranking responses were related to interactions with staff (84th percentile or higher). Fifty-one point one percent of patients (64th percentile) strongly agreed that they would seek future care in our system. Patient intent to return to the provider seen during the clinical trial was most highly correlated with intent to seek future care within our system (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Reasons cited for clinical trial enrollment were generally altruistic. CONCLUSIONS: Querying this special patient population is feasible and yields valuable insight into their experience with healthcare system-based clinical trials and the relationship between clinical trial participation and perception of the healthcare system as a desirable resource for routine medical care. We argue that this work is invaluable to the research community and submit a call to action to our peers to begin systematic evaluation of clinical trial patient satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5053216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50532162016-10-18 Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action Pflugeisen, Bethann Mangel Rebar, Stacie Reedy, Anne Pierce, Roslyn Amoroso, Paul J. Trials Research BACKGROUND: As patient satisfaction scores become increasingly relevant in today’s health care market, we sought to evaluate satisfaction of the unique subset of patients enrolling in clinical trials in a research facility embedded within a community hospital system. METHODS: We developed and deployed a patient satisfaction survey tailored to clinical trial patients who consented to and/or completed a clinical trial in our research institute in the prior year. The survey was distributed to 222 patients. Likert scale responses were analyzed using top box and percentile rank procedures. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations between the clinical trial experience and intent to return to our system for routine care. RESULTS: Ninety surveys were returned in the 6 months following the mailing for a 41 % response rate; the bulk of these (N = 81) were returned within 6 weeks of the mailing. The questions with the highest ranking responses were related to interactions with staff (84th percentile or higher). Fifty-one point one percent of patients (64th percentile) strongly agreed that they would seek future care in our system. Patient intent to return to the provider seen during the clinical trial was most highly correlated with intent to seek future care within our system (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001). Reasons cited for clinical trial enrollment were generally altruistic. CONCLUSIONS: Querying this special patient population is feasible and yields valuable insight into their experience with healthcare system-based clinical trials and the relationship between clinical trial participation and perception of the healthcare system as a desirable resource for routine medical care. We argue that this work is invaluable to the research community and submit a call to action to our peers to begin systematic evaluation of clinical trial patient satisfaction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5053216/ /pubmed/27716378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pflugeisen, Bethann Mangel Rebar, Stacie Reedy, Anne Pierce, Roslyn Amoroso, Paul J. Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title | Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title_full | Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title_fullStr | Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title_short | Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
title_sort | assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27716378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1616-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pflugeisenbethannmangel assessmentofclinicaltrialparticipantpatientsatisfactionacalltoaction AT rebarstacie assessmentofclinicaltrialparticipantpatientsatisfactionacalltoaction AT reedyanne assessmentofclinicaltrialparticipantpatientsatisfactionacalltoaction AT pierceroslyn assessmentofclinicaltrialparticipantpatientsatisfactionacalltoaction AT amorosopaulj assessmentofclinicaltrialparticipantpatientsatisfactionacalltoaction |