Cargando…

Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors

New N‐allyl/propargyl 4‐substituted 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroquinolines derivatives were efficiently synthesized using acid‐catalyzed three components cationic imino Diels–Alder reaction (70–95%). All compounds were tested in vitro as dual acetylcholinesterase and butyryl‐cholinesterase inhibitors and thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez, Yeray A., Gutiérrez, Margarita, Ramírez, David, Alzate‐Morales, Jans, Bernal, Cristian C., Güiza, Fausto M., Romero Bohórquez, Arnold R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27085663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12773
_version_ 1782458386712887296
author Rodríguez, Yeray A.
Gutiérrez, Margarita
Ramírez, David
Alzate‐Morales, Jans
Bernal, Cristian C.
Güiza, Fausto M.
Romero Bohórquez, Arnold R.
author_facet Rodríguez, Yeray A.
Gutiérrez, Margarita
Ramírez, David
Alzate‐Morales, Jans
Bernal, Cristian C.
Güiza, Fausto M.
Romero Bohórquez, Arnold R.
author_sort Rodríguez, Yeray A.
collection PubMed
description New N‐allyl/propargyl 4‐substituted 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroquinolines derivatives were efficiently synthesized using acid‐catalyzed three components cationic imino Diels–Alder reaction (70–95%). All compounds were tested in vitro as dual acetylcholinesterase and butyryl‐cholinesterase inhibitors and their potential binding modes, and affinity, were predicted by molecular docking and binding free energy calculations (∆G) respectively. The compound 4af (IC (50) = 72 μ m) presented the most effective inhibition against acetylcholinesterase despite its poor selectivity (SI = 2), while the best inhibitory activity on butyryl‐cholinesterase was exhibited by compound 4ae (IC (50) = 25.58 μ m) with considerable selectivity (SI = 0.15). Molecular docking studies indicated that the most active compounds fit in the reported acetylcholinesterase and butyryl‐cholinesterase active sites. Moreover, our computational data indicated a high correlation between the calculated ∆G and the experimental activity values in both targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5053295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50532952016-10-19 Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors Rodríguez, Yeray A. Gutiérrez, Margarita Ramírez, David Alzate‐Morales, Jans Bernal, Cristian C. Güiza, Fausto M. Romero Bohórquez, Arnold R. Chem Biol Drug Des Research Articles New N‐allyl/propargyl 4‐substituted 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroquinolines derivatives were efficiently synthesized using acid‐catalyzed three components cationic imino Diels–Alder reaction (70–95%). All compounds were tested in vitro as dual acetylcholinesterase and butyryl‐cholinesterase inhibitors and their potential binding modes, and affinity, were predicted by molecular docking and binding free energy calculations (∆G) respectively. The compound 4af (IC (50) = 72 μ m) presented the most effective inhibition against acetylcholinesterase despite its poor selectivity (SI = 2), while the best inhibitory activity on butyryl‐cholinesterase was exhibited by compound 4ae (IC (50) = 25.58 μ m) with considerable selectivity (SI = 0.15). Molecular docking studies indicated that the most active compounds fit in the reported acetylcholinesterase and butyryl‐cholinesterase active sites. Moreover, our computational data indicated a high correlation between the calculated ∆G and the experimental activity values in both targets. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-06 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5053295/ /pubmed/27085663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12773 Text en © 2016 The Authors Chemical Biology & Drug Design Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rodríguez, Yeray A.
Gutiérrez, Margarita
Ramírez, David
Alzate‐Morales, Jans
Bernal, Cristian C.
Güiza, Fausto M.
Romero Bohórquez, Arnold R.
Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title_full Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title_fullStr Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title_short Novel N‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: Synthesis via Three‐component Cationic Imino Diels–Alder Reaction, Binding Prediction, and Evaluation as Cholinesterase Inhibitors
title_sort novel n‐allyl/propargyl tetrahydroquinolines: synthesis via three‐component cationic imino diels–alder reaction, binding prediction, and evaluation as cholinesterase inhibitors
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5053295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27085663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12773
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezyeraya novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT gutierrezmargarita novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT ramirezdavid novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT alzatemoralesjans novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT bernalcristianc novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT guizafaustom novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors
AT romerobohorquezarnoldr novelnallylpropargyltetrahydroquinolinessynthesisviathreecomponentcationiciminodielsalderreactionbindingpredictionandevaluationascholinesteraseinhibitors